Quantifying Colocalization by Correlation: The Pearson Correlation Coefficient is Superior to the Mander's Overlap Coefficient

被引:774
|
作者
Adler, Jeremy [1 ]
Parmryd, Ingela [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Wenner Gren Inst, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
correlation; colocalization; co-occurrence; Mander's overlap coefficient; Pearson correlation coefficient; COLOR CONFOCAL IMAGES; QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS; MICROSCOPY; CELLS; PROTEINS;
D O I
10.1002/cyto.a.20896
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and the Mander's overlap coefficient (MOC) are used to quantify the degree of colocalization between fluorophores. The MOC was introduced to overcome perceived problems with the PCC. The two coefficients are mathematically similar, differing in the use of either the absolute intensities (MOC) or of the deviation from the mean (PCC). A range of correlated datasets, which extend to the limits of the PCC, only evoked a limited response from the MOC. The PCC is unaffected by changes to the offset while the MOC increases when the offset is positive. Both coefficients are independent of gain. The MOC is a confusing hybrid measurement, that combines correlation with a heavily weighted form of co-occurrence, favors high intensity combinations, downplays combinations in which either or both intensities are low and ignores blank pixels. The PCC only measures correlation. A surprising finding was that the addition of a second uncorrelated population can substantially increase the measured correlation, demonstrating the importance of excluding background pixels. Overall, since the MOC is unresponsive to substantial changes in the data and is hard to interpret, it is neither an alternative to nor a useful substitute for the PCC. The MOC is not suitable for making measurements of colocalization either by correlation or co-occurrence. (C) 2010 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 742
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dynamic signature verification method based on Pearson correlation coefficient
    Liu R.
    Xin Y.
    Li Y.
    Yi Qi Yi Biao Xue Bao/Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2022, 43 (07): : 279 - 287
  • [42] Joint geoacoustic inversion based on Pearson correlation coefficient constraints
    Ding, Jiaqi
    Zhao, Xiaofeng
    Yang, Pinglv
    JASA EXPRESS LETTERS, 2023, 3 (10):
  • [43] Multiple Ant Colony Optimization Based on Pearson Correlation Coefficient
    Zhu, Hongwei
    You, Xiaoming
    Liu, Sheng
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 61628 - 61638
  • [44] Minimisation of bias of Pearson correlation coefficient in presence of coincidental outliers
    Tsagkanos, Athanasios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS AND ECONOMETRICS, 2018, 8 (01) : 121 - 128
  • [45] ADDITIONAL CAUTIONARY NOTES ABOUT THE PEARSON CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT
    MAIMON, Z
    RAVEH, A
    MOSHEIOV, G
    QUALITY & QUANTITY, 1986, 20 (04) : 313 - 325
  • [46] A note on Pearson Correlation Coefficient as a metric of similarity in recommender system
    Sheugh, Leily
    Alizadeh, Sasan H.
    2015 AI & ROBOTICS (IRANOPEN), 2015,
  • [47] Keyframe extraction using Pearson correlation coefficient and color moments
    Bommisetty, Reddy Mounika
    Prakash, Om
    Khare, Ashish
    MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS, 2020, 26 (03) : 267 - 299
  • [48] Pearson Correlation Coefficient acceleration for modeling and mapping of neural interconnections
    Reggiani, Enrico
    D'Arnese, Eleonora
    Purgato, Andrea
    Santambrogio, Marco D.
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING SYMPOSIUM WORKSHOPS (IPDPSW), 2017, : 223 - 228
  • [49] Keyframe extraction using Pearson correlation coefficient and color moments
    Reddy Mounika Bommisetty
    Om Prakash
    Ashish Khare
    Multimedia Systems, 2020, 26 : 267 - 299
  • [50] REPORTING OF SIGNIFICANCE LEVELS VERSUS PEARSON CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT
    KIRWAN, JR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1984, 23 (03): : 232 - 233