Quantifying Colocalization by Correlation: The Pearson Correlation Coefficient is Superior to the Mander's Overlap Coefficient

被引:732
|
作者
Adler, Jeremy [1 ]
Parmryd, Ingela [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Wenner Gren Inst, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
correlation; colocalization; co-occurrence; Mander's overlap coefficient; Pearson correlation coefficient; COLOR CONFOCAL IMAGES; QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS; MICROSCOPY; CELLS; PROTEINS;
D O I
10.1002/cyto.a.20896
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and the Mander's overlap coefficient (MOC) are used to quantify the degree of colocalization between fluorophores. The MOC was introduced to overcome perceived problems with the PCC. The two coefficients are mathematically similar, differing in the use of either the absolute intensities (MOC) or of the deviation from the mean (PCC). A range of correlated datasets, which extend to the limits of the PCC, only evoked a limited response from the MOC. The PCC is unaffected by changes to the offset while the MOC increases when the offset is positive. Both coefficients are independent of gain. The MOC is a confusing hybrid measurement, that combines correlation with a heavily weighted form of co-occurrence, favors high intensity combinations, downplays combinations in which either or both intensities are low and ignores blank pixels. The PCC only measures correlation. A surprising finding was that the addition of a second uncorrelated population can substantially increase the measured correlation, demonstrating the importance of excluding background pixels. Overall, since the MOC is unresponsive to substantial changes in the data and is hard to interpret, it is neither an alternative to nor a useful substitute for the PCC. The MOC is not suitable for making measurements of colocalization either by correlation or co-occurrence. (C) 2010 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 742
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Pearson's correlation coefficient is not a universally superior colocalization metric. Response to 'Quantifying colocalization: the MOC is a hybrid coefficient - an uninformative mix of co-occurrence and correlation'
    Aaron, Jesse S.
    Taylor, Aaron B.
    Chew, Teng-Leong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, 2019, 132 (01)
  • [2] Pearson's correlation coefficient
    Williams, S
    [J]. NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 109 (1015) : 38 - 38
  • [3] Pearson's correlation coefficient
    Sedgwick, Philip
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
  • [4] Should Pearson's correlation coefficient be avoided?
    Armstrong, Richard A.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2019, 39 (05) : 316 - 327
  • [5] Analytic posteriors for Pearson's correlation coefficient
    Ly, Alexander
    Marsman, Maarten
    Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
    [J]. STATISTICA NEERLANDICA, 2018, 72 (01) : 4 - 13
  • [6] Colocalization Analysis in Fluorescence Micrographs: Verification of a More Accurate Calculation of Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
    Barlow, Andrew L.
    MacLeod, Alasdair
    Noppen, Samuel
    Sanderson, Jeremy
    Guerin, Christopher J.
    [J]. MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS, 2010, 16 (06) : 710 - 724
  • [7] Quantifying colocalization: The case for discarding the Manders overlap coefficient
    Adler, Jeremy
    Parmryd, Ingela
    [J]. CYTOMETRY PART A, 2021, 99 (09) : 910 - 920
  • [8] Robust estimation and test for Pearson's correlation coefficient
    Liu, Pengfei
    Wang, Shaochen
    Zhao, Peng
    [J]. RANDOM MATRICES-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2024,
  • [9] A DATA SHEET FOR THE PEARSON CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
    Thurstone, L. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1922, 6 (01): : 49 - 56
  • [10] Regression models of Pearson correlation coefficient
    Dufera, Abdisa G.
    Liu, Tiantian
    Xu, Jin
    [J]. STATISTICAL THEORY AND RELATED FIELDS, 2023, 7 (02) : 97 - 106