Low-Volume Brachial Plexus Block Providing Surgical Anesthesia for Distal Arm Surgery Comparing Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular, and Axillary Approach: A Randomized Observer Blind Trial

被引:19
|
作者
Vazin, Mojgan [1 ]
Jensen, Kenneth [1 ]
Kristensen, Danja L. [1 ]
Hjort, Mathias [1 ]
Tanggaard, Katrine [2 ]
Karmakar, Manoj K. [3 ]
Bendtsen, Thomas F. [4 ]
Borglum, Jens [2 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care Med, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Zealand Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care Med, Sygehusvej 10, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care Med, Norrebrogade 44, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
TRIPLE INJECTION TECHNIQUE; ULTRASOUND; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1155/2016/7094121
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background. Distal arm surgery is widely performed under regional anesthesia with brachial plexus block. The preponderance of evidence for the efficacy relies upon injection of local anesthetic in excess of 30 mL. We aimed to compare three different ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block techniques restricting the total volume to 20 mL. Methods. 120 patientswere prospectively randomized to ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block with 20mL ropivacaine 0.75% at either the supraclavicular, infraclavicular, or axillary level. Multiinjection technique was performed with all three approaches. Primary outcome measure was performance time. Results. Performance time and procedural pain were similar between groups. Needle passes and injection numbers were significantly reduced in the infraclavicular group (P < 0.01). Nerve visibility was significantly reduced in the axillary group (P = 0.01). Success-rate was significantly increased in the supraclavicular versus the axillary group (P < 0.025). Total anesthesiarelated time was significantly reduced in the supraclavicular compared to the infraclavicular group (P < 0.01). Block duration was significantly increased in the infraclavicular group (P < 0.05). No early adverse effects occurred. Conclusion. Supraclavicular and infraclavicular blocks exhibited favorable characteristics compared to the axillary block. Supraclavicular brachial plexus block with the multiinjection intracluster technique exhibited significantly reduced total anesthesia-related time and higher success rate without any early adverse events.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Comparison of para-vascular supraclavicular brachial plexus block and costo-clavicular approach of infraclavicular brachial plexus block in providing surgical anesthesia for below elbow surgery: a randomized, single blind study
    Waindeskar, Vaishali
    Raj, Charan
    Jain, Anuj
    Trivedi, Saurabh
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [2] Comparison of para-vascular supraclavicular brachial plexus block and costo-clavicular approach of infraclavicular brachial plexus block in providing surgical anesthesia for below elbow surgery: a randomized, single blind study
    Vaishali Waindeskar
    Charan Raj
    Anuj Jain
    Saurabh Trivedi
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 14
  • [3] Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
    Stav, Anatoli
    Reytman, Leonid
    Stav, Michael-Yohay
    Portnoy, Isaak
    Kantarovsky, Alexander
    Galili, Offer
    Luboshitz, Shmuel
    Sevi, Roger
    Sternberg, Ahud
    RAMBAM MAIMONIDES MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 7 (02):
  • [4] Infraclavicular and supraclavicular approaches to brachial plexus for ambulatory elbow surgery: A randomized controlled observer-blinded trial
    Dhir, Shalini
    Brown, Brigid
    Mack, Peter
    Bureau, Yves
    Yu, Janice
    Ross, Douglas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2018, 48 : 67 - 72
  • [5] Retroclavicular or supraclavicular brachial plexus block for patients undergoing distal upper limb surgery? A randomized controlled trial
    Grape, S.
    Weber, E.
    Albrecht, E.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2018, 148 : 6S - 7S
  • [6] Comparison between ultrasound guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular brachial plexus block to assess the quality of surgical anaesthesia and intraoperative tourniquet pain: A prospective randomized observer blinded study
    Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh
    Susmitha, B. Sai
    Gadvi, Priyanka
    JOURNAL OF KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY, 2024, 13 (01) : 86 - 92
  • [7] A comparison of the continuous supraclavicular brachial plexus block using the proximal longitudinal oblique approach and the interscalene brachial plexus block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery A randomised, controlled, double-blind trial
    Kim, Yeon Ju
    Kim, Hyungtae
    Kim, Sehee
    Kang, Mi-Ra
    Kim, Ha-Jung
    Koh, Won Uk
    Lee, Sooho
    Ro, Young-Jin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 41 (06) : 402 - 410
  • [8] A Triple-Masked, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus and Distal Peripheral Nerve Block Anesthesia for Outpatient Hand Surgery
    Lam, Nicholas C. K.
    Charles, Matthew
    Mercer, Deana
    Soneru, Codruta
    Dillow, Jennifer
    Jaime, Francisco
    Petersen, Timothy R.
    Mariano, Edward R.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2014, 2014
  • [9] Comparing Preoperative Anxiety Effects of Brachial Plexus Block and General Anesthesia for Orthopedic Upper-Extremity Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Sertcakacilar, Gokhan
    Yildiz, Gunes Ozlem
    Bayram, Berhan
    Pektas, Yaser
    Cukurova, Zafer
    Hergunsel, Gulsum Oya
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (09):
  • [10] Efficacy of a single injection compared with triple injections using a costoclavicular approach for infraclavicular brachial plexus block during forearm and hand surgery A randomized controlled trial
    Lee, Mi Geum
    Jung, Wol Seon
    Go, Doo Yeon
    Choi, Sung Uk
    Shin, Hye Won
    Choi, Yun Suk
    Shin, Hyeon Ju
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (43)