Likert-Type Survey Data Analysis with R and RStudio

被引:0
|
作者
Komperda, Regis [1 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Dept Chem, Portland, OR 97207 USA
关键词
CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; COMMON FACTOR-ANALYSIS; ON LABORATORY SKILLS; GENERAL-CHEMISTRY; COMPONENT ANALYSIS; ORGANIC-CHEMISTRY; STUDENTS; MEANINGFUL; RELIABILITY; ALTERNATIVES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The free statistical software R and the free integrated development environment RStudio provide comprehensive tools to visualize and analyze quantitative survey data. The breadth of packages available to extend the functionality of R makes it a viable alternative to traditional software, such as Excel, SPSS, SAS, Stata, Mplus, and LISREL, frequently used for quantitative survey data analysis including providing psychometric evidence of instrument quality. Using a sample dataset available in R, this chapter will walk through the use of functions from the likert, psych, and lavaan packages. These packages can be used to visualize response pattern distributions from Likert-type items, generate descriptive statistics, examine evidence for internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and conduct various types of factor analyses to provide evidence for the internal structure of an instrument. While this chapter uses a dataset from a survey with a Likert response scale, the functions described can be applied to quantitative data obtained from a variety of instrument types. Examples from the chemistry education research literature of using these techniques for survey data analysis and instrument development will be highlighted.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 116
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Deep Learning Imputation for Asymmetric and Incomplete Likert-Type Items
    Collier, Zachary K.
    Kong, Minji
    Soyoye, Olushola
    Chawla, Kamal
    Aviles, Ann M.
    Payne, Yasser
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2024, 49 (02) : 241 - 267
  • [42] Effectiveness of different missing data treatments in surveys with likert-type data: Introducing the relative mean substitution approach
    Raaijmakers, QAW
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1999, 59 (05) : 725 - 748
  • [43] A New Multiprocess IRT Model With Ideal Points for Likert-Type Items
    Jin, Kuan-Yu
    Wu, Yi-Jhen
    Chen, Hui-Fang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2022, 47 (03) : 297 - 321
  • [44] The use of a specific non-response option on Likert-type scales
    Ryan, C
    Garland, R
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 1999, 20 (01) : 107 - 113
  • [45] Effects of Response Option Order on Likert-Type Psychometric Properties and Reactions
    Robie, Chet
    Meade, Adam W.
    Risavy, Stephen D.
    Rasheed, Sabah
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2022, 82 (06) : 1107 - 1129
  • [46] Adjustment for acquiescence in the assessment of the construct equivalence of Likert-type score items
    Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J
    Billiet, J
    Cambré, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 34 (06) : 702 - 722
  • [47] TOWARD A COMMON PROCEDURE USING LIKERT AND LIKERT-TYPE SCALES IN SMALL GROUPS COMPARATIVE DESIGN OBSERVATIONS
    Guerra, A. L.
    Gidel, T.
    Vezzetti, E.
    [J]. DS 84: PROCEEDINGS OF THE DESIGN 2016 14TH INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-4, 2016, : 23 - 32
  • [48] Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs for Categorical Factor Analysis With Likert-Type, Ordinal, or Binary Responses
    McNeish, Daniel
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2023, 78 (09) : 1061 - 1075
  • [49] THE INFLUENCE OF THE RESPONSE FORMAT IN A PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRE: AN ANALYSIS OF A DICHOTOMOUS, A LIKERT-TYPE, AND A VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE
    Hilbert, Sven
    Kuechenhoff, Helmut
    Sarubin, Nina
    Nakagawa, Tristan Toyo
    Buehner, Markus
    [J]. TPM-TESTING PSYCHOMETRICS METHODOLOGY IN APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) : 3 - 24
  • [50] NUMBER OF ALTERNATIVES PER CHOICE POINT AND STABILITY OF LIKERT-TYPE SCALES
    OASTER, TRF
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1989, 68 (02) : 549 - 550