The Vulnerability of Emerging Sign Languages: (E)merging Sign Languages?

被引:2
|
作者
Jaraisy, Marah [1 ]
Stamp, Rose [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept English Language & Linguist, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Bar Ilan Univ, Dept English Literature & Linguist, IL-5290002 Ramat Gan, Israel
关键词
language shift; mergence; Israeli Sign Language; Kufr Qassem Sign Language; bilinguals; language preference; ENDANGERED LANGUAGES; SPOKEN LANGUAGE; IDEOLOGIES; EMERGENCE; VITALITY; COMMUNITY; DEAFNESS; SHIFT;
D O I
10.3390/languages7010049
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Emerging sign languages offer linguists an opportunity to observe language emergence in real time, far beyond the capabilities of spoken language studies. Sign languages can emerge in different social circumstances-some in larger heterogeneous communities, while others in smaller and more homogeneous communities. Often, examples of the latter, such as Ban Khor Sign Language (in Thailand), Al Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language (in Israel), and Mardin Sign Language (in Turkey), arise in communities with a high incidence of hereditary deafness. Traditionally, these communities were in limited contact with the wider deaf community in the region, and so the local sign language remained relatively uninfluenced by the surrounding signed language(s). Yet, in recent years, changes in education, mobility, and social communication patterns have resulted in increased interaction between sign languages. Rather than undergoing language emergence, these sign languages are now facing a state of "mergence" with the majority sign language used by the wider deaf community. This study focuses on the language contact situation between two sign languages in Kufr Qassem, Israel. In the current situation, third-generation deaf signers in Kufr Qassem are exposed to the local sign language, Kufr Qassem Sign Language (KQSL), and the dominant sign language of the wider Israeli deaf community, Israeli Sign Language (ISL), both of which emerged around 90 years ago. In the current study, we analyzed the signing of twelve deaf sign-bilinguals from Kufr Qassem whilst they engaged in a semi-spontaneous task in three language conditions: (1) with another bilingual signer, (2) with a monolingual KQSL signer, and (3) with a monolingual ISL signer. The results demonstrate that KQSL-ISL sign-bilinguals show a preference for ISL in all conditions, even when paired with a monolingual KQSL signer. We conclude that the degree of language shift in Kufr Qassem is considerable. KQSL may be endangered due to the risk of social and linguistic mergence of the KQSL community with the ISL community in the near future.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Phonological Organization of Sign Languages
    Sandler, Wendy
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS COMPASS, 2012, 6 (03): : 162 - 182
  • [42] The sociolinguistics of sign languages.
    Grushkin, DA
    [J]. LANGUAGE IN SOCIETY, 2003, 32 (03) : 422 - 424
  • [43] On the Theatricality of Sign Languages on Stage
    Haughey, Laura
    Armstrong, Denise
    [J]. PERFORMANCE RESEARCH, 2019, 24 (04) : 76 - 79
  • [44] Research on Verbs in Sign Languages
    Cheng, Mingming
    Wang, Fei
    Fan, Chao
    [J]. 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING (ICAISC 2012), 2012, 12 : 495 - +
  • [45] Lexical Frequency in Sign Languages
    Johnston, Trevor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEAF STUDIES AND DEAF EDUCATION, 2012, 17 (02): : 163 - 193
  • [46] Argument Structure in Sign Languages
    Kimmelman, Vadim
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF LINGUISTICS, 2022, 8 : 19 - 38
  • [47] The sociolinguistics of sign languages.
    Schieffelin, BB
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2002, 23 (04) : 670 - 673
  • [48] Sign Language Typology: The Contribution of Rural Sign Languages
    de Vos, Connie
    Pfau, Roland
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF LINGUISTICS, VOL 1, 2015, 1 : 265 - 288
  • [49] Analysis of sign languages: A step towards multi-lingual machine translation for sign languages
    Herath, S
    Saito, C
    Herath, A
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES OF SYSTEM INFORMATICS, 2000, 1755 : 530 - 537
  • [50] SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SPOKEN LANGUAGES AND NATURAL SIGN LANGUAGES
    SWISHER, MV
    [J]. APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 1988, 9 (04) : 343 - 356