Does REDD plus have a chance? Implications from Pemba, Tanzania

被引：5

作者：

Andrews, Jeffrey B. ^{[1
]}

Caro, Tim ^{[2
]}

Juma Ali, Said ^{[3
]}

Collins, Amy C. ^{[2
]}

Bakari Hamadi, Bidawa ^{[4
]}

Sellieman Khamis, Hassan ^{[4
]}

Mzee, Abdi ^{[3
]}

Sharif Ngwali, Assaa ^{[3
]}

Borgerhoff Mulder, Monique ^{[1
,5
]}

机构：

[1] Max Planck Inst Evolutionary Anthropol, Dept Human Behav Ecol & Culture, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany

[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Wildlife Fish & Conservat Biol, Davis, CA 95616 USA

[3] Dept Forests & Non Renewable Nat Resources, Pemba, Zanzibar, Tanzania

[4] Jumuiya Uhifadhi Misitu Jamii Zanzibar, Zanzibar, Pemba, Tanzania

[5] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anthropol, Davis, CA 95616 USA

来源：

ORYX | 2021年 / 55卷 / 05期

关键词：

Carbon payments; community forestry; Pemba; REDD plus; Tanzania; Zanzibar; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LAND-USE; CONSERVATION; PROJECT; SUCCESS; DESIGN; ISSUES; CARBON; TENURE;

D O I：

10.1017/S0030605319001376

中图分类号：

X176 [生物多样性保护];

学科分类号：

090705 ;

摘要：

Conservation scientists continue to debate the strengths and weaknesses of REDD+ as an instrument to slow greenhouse gas emissions in the developing world. We propose that general positions on this debate are less helpful than drawing lessons from specific investigations into the features of individual projects that make them successful or not. Here, focusing on a site-specific REDD+ intervention in Pemba, Zanzibar (Tanzania), we examine the circumstances under which REDD+ has a chance of success, teasing out specific features of both REDD+ interventions and the socio-economic and institutional contexts that render REDD+ a potentially valuable complement to community forestry. Additionally, we highlight some unanticipated positive outcomes associated with the design features of REDD+ projects. Our broader goal is to move away from ideologically-driven debate to empirically-based identification of general conditions where REDD+ could work, and to provide policy recommendations.

引用

页码：725 / 731

页数：7

共 50 条

[31] What Is a "Community Perception" of REDD plus ? A Systematic Review of How Perceptions of REDD plus Have Been Elicited and Reported in the Literature
Atmadja, Stibniati S.
Sills, Erin O.
[J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11):
[32] Global, National, or Market? Emerging REDD plus Governance Practices in Mozambique and Tanzania
Palmujoki, Eero
Virtanen, Pekka
[J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2016, 16 (01) : 59 - 78
[33] Is REDD plus effective, efficient, and equitable? Learning from a REDD plus project in Northern Cambodia
Nathan, Iben
Pasgaard, Maya
[J]. GEOFORUM, 2017, 83 : 26 - 38
[34] Does Ethics Have a Chance in a World of Consumers?
Rice, John Steadman
[J]. SOCIOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2009, 79 (02) : 257 - 259
[35] Does Ethics have a Chance in a World of Consumers?
Kattago, Siobhan
[J]. CONSTELLATIONS-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL AND DEMOCRATIC THEORY, 2010, 17 (01): : 178 - 180
[36] Is REDD plus More of an Institutional Affair than a Market Process? The Concealed Social and Cultural Consequences of an Ongoing REDD plus Project in Kolo Hills, Tanzania
Bartholdson, Orjan
Abdallah, Jumanne M.
Marquardt, Kristina
Salomonsson, Lennart
[J]. FORESTS, 2019, 10 (08):
[37] Does the argotourism have a chance in the forestry as well?
Junek, Jiri
Fialova, Jitka
[J]. PUBLIC RECREATION AND LANDSCAPE PROTECTION - HAND IN HAND?: CONFERENCE PROCEEDING, 2011, : 31 - 33
[38] DOES ETHICS HAVE A CHANCE IN A CONSUMER WORLD
Zordan, Laurence
[J]. QUINZAINE LITTERAIRE, 2009, (1000): : 41 - 41
[39] Does the scholarly monograph still have a chance?
Givler, P
[J]. PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2001, 16 (04) : 64 - 70
[40] DOES SYSTEMATIC PHILOSOPHY HAVE ANY CHANCE
GLOYOVA, K
[J]. FILOSOFICKY CASOPIS, 1992, 40 (02): : 261 - 275

← 1 2 3 4 5 →