Individual preferences for physical exercise as secondary prevention for non-specific low back pain: A discrete choice experiment

被引:26
|
作者
Aboagye, Emmanuel [1 ]
Hagberg, Jan [1 ]
Axen, Iben [1 ]
Kwak, Lydia [1 ]
Lohela-Karlsson, Malin [1 ]
Skillgate, Eva [2 ]
Dahlgren, Gunilla [3 ]
Jensen, Irene [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, Unit Intervent & Implementat Res Worker Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, Unit Cardiovasc Epidemiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, Unit Occupat & Environm Med, Umea, Sweden
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 12期
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; HEALTH; ADULTS; INTERVENTIONS; CARE; DETERMINANTS; TRIAL; YOGA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0187709
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Exercise is effective in improving non-specific low back pain (LBP). Certain components of physical exercise, such as the type, intensity and frequency of exercise, are likely to influence participation among working adults with non-specific LBP, but the value and relative importance of these components remain unknown. The study's aim was to examine such specific components and their influence on individual preferences for exercise for secondary prevention of non-specific LBP among working adults. Methods In a discrete choice experiment, working individuals with non-specific LBP answered a webbased questionnaire. Each respondent was given ten pairs of hypothetical exercise programs and asked to choose one option from each pair. The choices comprised six attributes of exercise (i.e., type of training, design, intensity, frequency, proximity and incentives), each with either three or four levels. A conditional logit regression that reflected the random utility model was used to analyze the responses. Results The final study population consisted of 112 participants. The participants' preferred exercise option was aerobic (i.e., cardiovascular) rather than strength training, group exercise with trainer supervision, rather than individual or unsupervised exercise. They also preferred high intensity exercise performed at least once or twice per week. The most popular types of incentive were exercise during working hours and a wellness allowance rather than coupons for sports goods. The results show that the relative value of some attribute levels differed between young adults (age <= 44 years) and older adults (age <= 45 years) in terms of the level of trainer supervision required, exercise intensity, travel time to exercise location and financial incentives. For active study participants, exercise frequency (i.e., twice per week, 1.15; CI: 0.25; 2.06) influenced choice of exercise. For individuals with more than one child, travel time (i.e., 20 minutes, - 0.55; CI: 0.65; 3.26) was also an influential attribute for choice of exercise, showing that people with children at home preferred to exercise close to home. Conclusions This study adds to our knowledge about what types of exercise working adults with back pain are most likely to participate in. The exercise should be a cardiovascular type of training carried out in a group with trainer supervision. It should also be of high intensity and preferably performed twice per week during working hours. Coupons for sports goods do not appear to motivate physical activity among workers with LBP. The findings of the study could have a substantial impact on the planning and development of exercise provision and promotion strategies to improve non-specific LBP. Providers and employers may be able to improve participation in exercise programs for adults with non-specific LBP by focusing on the exercise components which are the most attractive. This in turn would improve satisfaction and adherence to exercise interventions aimed at preventing recurrent non-specific LBP.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physical activity preferences of patients experiencing non-specific low back pain
    Zandwijk, Pim
    van Koppen, Ben
    van Mameren, Henk
    Winkens, Bjorn
    de Bie, Rob
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2018, 20 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [2] Exercise as an intervention for non-specific low back pain
    Kell, Robert
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2010, 15 (01) : 36 - 37
  • [3] Patient Preferences for Treatment of Low Back Pain-A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Klojgaard, Mirja Elisabeth
    Manniche, Claus
    Pedersen, Line Bjornskov
    Beth, Mickael
    Sogaard, Rikke
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (04) : 390 - 396
  • [4] Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain
    Hayden, JA
    van Tulder, MV
    Malmivaara, A
    Koes, BW
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (03):
  • [5] Exercise therapy for the treatment of non-specific low back pain
    Steefel, Lorraine
    Jadotte, Yuri Tertilus
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2012, 10 (02): : 164 - 165
  • [6] Exercise therapy for acute non-specific low back pain
    Oosterhuis, Teddy
    Ijzelenberg, Helma
    Rubinstein, Sidney
    Hayden, Jill
    Koes, Bart
    van Tulder, Maurits
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2018, 15 (10): : S60 - S60
  • [7] Effect of Movement Control Spinal Exercise Programme on Pain and Mobility in Individual with Non-Specific Low Back Pain
    D'Souza, Celina Elias
    Shinde, Sandeep
    Bhoren, Prachiti
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 33 (49A) : 292 - 298
  • [8] Non-specific low back pain
    Balague, Federico
    Mannion, Anne F.
    Pellise, Ferran
    Cedraschi, Christine
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9814): : 482 - 491
  • [9] Non-Specific Low Back Pain
    Chenot, Jean-Francois
    Greitemann, Bernhard
    Kladny, Bernd
    Petzke, Frank
    Pfingsten, Michael
    Schorr, Susanne Gabriele
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 114 (51-52): : 883 - +
  • [10] Low back pain (non-specific)
    Krismer, M.
    van Tulder, M.
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 21 (01): : 77 - 91