Patient Preferences for Treatment of Low Back Pain-A Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:37
|
作者
Klojgaard, Mirja Elisabeth [1 ]
Manniche, Claus [2 ]
Pedersen, Line Bjornskov [1 ]
Beth, Mickael [1 ]
Sogaard, Rikke [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, COHERE Ctr Hlth Econ Res, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Inst Reg Hlth Serv Res, Hosp Lillebaelt, Spine Ctr Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
[3] Dept Hlth Serv Res, Dept Publ Hlth, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
decision making; discrete choice experiment; low back pain; patient preferences; stated preferences; DEGENERATIVE SPINAL-DISORDERS; LUMBAR INSTRUMENTED FUSION; SURGICAL DECISION-MAKING; REHABILITATION PROGRAM; COGNITIVE INTERVENTION; EXPECTATIONS; SURGERY; TRIAL; OUTCOMES; WILLINGNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: Back pain imposes a substantial economic and social burden, and treatment decisions are distorted by conflicting evidence. Thus, it is important to include patient preferences in decision making and policy making. Objective: To contribute to the understanding of patient preferences in relation to the choice of treatment for low back pain. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted with consecutive patients referred to a regional spine center. The respondents (n = 348) were invited to respond to a choice of two hypothetical treatment options and an opt out option. The treatment attributes included the treatment modality, the risk of relapse, the reduction in pain, and the expected increase in the ability to perform activities of daily living. In addition, the wait time to achieve the treatment effect was used as a payment vehicle. Mixed logit models were created to perform analysis. Subgroup analysis, dividing respondents into sociodemographic and disease-related categories, further explored the willingness to wait Results: Respondents assigned positive utilities to positive treatment outcomes and disutility to higher risks and longer waits for effects of treatment and to surgical interventions. The model captured significant heterogeneity within the sample for the outcomes of pain reduction and the ability to pursue activities of daily living and for the treatment modality. The subgroup analysis revealed differences in the willingness to wait, especially with regard to treatment modality, the level of pain experienced at the time of data collection, and the respondents' preferences for surgery. Conclusions: The majority of the respondents prefer nonsurgical interventions, but patients are willing to wait for more ideal outcomes and preferred interventions. The results show that health care professionals have a very important task in communicating clearly about the expected results of treatment and the basis of their treatment decisions, as patients' preferences are highly individual.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 396
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CAPER: patient preferences to inform nonsurgical treatment of chronic low back pain: a discrete-choice experiment
    Wilson, Leslie
    Zheng, Patricia
    Ionova, Yelena
    Denham, Alina
    Yoo, Connie
    Ma, Yanlei
    Greco, Carol M.
    Hanmer, Janel
    Williams, David A.
    Hassett, Afton L.
    Scheffler, Aaron Wolfe
    Valone, Frank
    Mehling, Wolf
    Berven, Sigurd
    Lotz, Jeffrey
    O'Neill, Conor
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (08) : 963 - 973
  • [2] CHRONIC PAIN: PATIENT TREATMENT PREFERENCES - A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Muehlbacher, A.
    Ezemieks, J.
    Nuebling, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (07) : A417 - A418
  • [3] Patient preferences for osteoarthritis pain and chronic low back pain treatments in the United States: a discrete-choice experiment
    Turk, D.
    Boeri, M.
    Abraham, L.
    Atkinson, J.
    Bushmakin, A. G.
    Cappelleri, J. C.
    Hauber, B.
    Klein, K.
    Russo, L.
    Viktrup, L.
    Walsh, D.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2020, 28 (09) : 1202 - 1213
  • [4] Patient Preferences in Subglottic Stenosis Treatment: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Naunheim, Matthew R.
    Naunheim, Margaret L.
    Rathi, Vinay K.
    Franco, Ramon A.
    Shrime, Mark G.
    Song, Phillip C.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2018, 158 (03) : 520 - 526
  • [5] Patient preferences for treatment of psoriasis with biologics: a discrete choice experiment
    Kromer, C.
    Schaarschmidt, M. -L.
    Schmieder, A.
    Herr, R.
    Goerdt, S.
    Peitsch, W. K.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 171 (06) : E125 - E125
  • [6] Patient Preferences for Cholesterol Treatment Options: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Lewey, Jennifer
    Choudhry, Niteesh K.
    Gagne, Joshua J.
    Avorn, Jerry
    Najafzadeh, Mehdi
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 26 : 157 - 157
  • [7] Patient preferences for treatment of psoriasis with biologicals: a discrete choice experiment
    Schaarschmidt, M. L.
    Kromer, C.
    Herr, R.
    Schmieder, A.
    Goerdt, S.
    Peitsch, W. K.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 24 (03) : E18 - E18
  • [8] Preferences of patients with chronic low back pain about nonsurgical treatments: Results of a discrete choice experiment
    Morillon, Gabin F.
    Benkhalti, Maria
    Dagenais, Pierre
    Poder, Thomas G.
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (01) : 510 - 530
  • [9] Patient Preferences for Treatment of Psoriasis with Biologicals: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Kromer, Christian
    Schaarschmidt, Marthe-Lisa
    Schmieder, Astrid
    Herr, Raphael
    Goerdt, Sergij
    Peitsch, Wiebke K.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [10] Patient preferences for the treatment of chronic cough: a discrete choice experiment
    Swaminathan, Aparna C.
    Yang, Jui-Chen
    Ding, Helen
    Grover, Kiran
    Coles, Theresa
    Schelfhout, Jonathan
    Johnson, F. Reed
    [J]. BMJ OPEN RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2024, 11 (01)