Convergent validity of three brief six-factor measures of personality

被引:6
|
作者
Julian, Amanda M. [1 ]
Novitsky, Christine [2 ,5 ]
Lee, Kibeom [3 ,6 ]
Ashton, Michael C. [4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Monark, 4301-400 3 Ave SW, Calgary, AB T2P 4H2, Canada
[2] St Marys Univ, Dept Psychol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Psychol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Brock Univ, Dept Psychol, St Catharines, ON, Canada
[5] St Marys Univ, 14500 Bannister Rd SE, Halifax, NS T2X 1Z4, Canada
[6] Univ Calgary, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[7] Brock Univ, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
关键词
Personality assessment; Six-factor personality; Brief measures; HEXACO model; DIMENSIONS; TINY;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2021.111436
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised (HEXACO-PI-R) is widely used in personality research. Several brief inventories measuring broadly similar six-factor structures have recently emerged (e.g., the Mini-International Personality Item Pool (Mini-IPIP6; Milojev et al., 2013), the Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI; De Vries, 2013), and the 24-Item Questionnaire Big Six scales (24-QB6; Thalmayer et al., 2011)). Using self- and observer reports collected from 202 undergraduate students, we evaluated the similarities and differences among these three brief inventories. The BHI, which was developed specifically to measure the HEXACO factors, showed a clearer one-toone correspondence with the original HEXACO scales than did the scales of the other two inventories. The results further illustrate the constructs assessed by the three short inventories.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Testing the convergent and discriminant validity of three implicit motive measures: PSE, OMT, and MMG
    Schueler, Julia
    Brandstaeter, Veronika
    Wegner, Mirko
    Baumann, Nicola
    [J]. MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2015, 39 (06) : 839 - 857
  • [32] Convergent and divergent validity of three measures of conservation behavior - The multitrait-multimethod approach
    Corral-Verdugo, V
    Figueredo, AJ
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1999, 31 (06) : 805 - 820
  • [33] CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF SELECTED ASSERTIVENESS MEASURES
    SWIMMER, GI
    RAMANAIAH, NV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 49 (01) : 243 - 249
  • [34] Convergent validity of executive organization measures on cancellation
    Woods, Adam J.
    Mark, Victor W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 29 (07) : 719 - 723
  • [35] Assessing early writing: a six-factor model to inform assessment and teaching
    Scull, Janet
    Mackenzie, Noella M.
    Bowles, Terence
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOR POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2020, 19 (02) : 239 - 259
  • [36] Convergent and criterion validity of PROMIS anxiety measures relative to six legacy measures and a structured diagnostic interview for anxiety in cancer patients
    Kerrie Clover
    Sylvie D. Lambert
    Christopher Oldmeadow
    Benjamin Britton
    Alex J. Mitchell
    Gregory Carter
    Madeleine T. King
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 6
  • [37] Convergent and criterion validity of PROMIS anxiety measures relative to six legacy measures and a structured diagnostic interview for anxiety in cancer patients
    Clover, Kerrie
    Lambert, Sylvie D.
    Oldmeadow, Christopher
    Britton, Benjamin
    Mitchell, Alex J.
    Carter, Gregory
    King, Madeleine T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [38] Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being
    Ryff, Carol D.
    Singer, Burton H.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2006, 35 (04) : 1103 - 1119
  • [39] Assessing the Six-Factor Model of Organizational Justice in the Context of Workplace Mediation
    Coggburn, Jerrell D.
    Daley, Dennis M.
    Jameson, Jessica Katz
    Berry-James, RaJade M.
    [J]. REVIEW OF PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 40 (03) : 355 - 383
  • [40] Assessing early writing: a six-factor model to inform assessment and teaching
    Janet Scull
    Noella M. Mackenzie
    Terence Bowles
    [J]. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2020, 19 : 239 - 259