The spatial and temporal distribution of predatory and phytophagous mites in field-grown strawberry in the UK

被引:15
|
作者
Fitzgerald, Jean [1 ]
Xu, Xiangming [1 ]
Pepper, Nicola [1 ]
Easterbrook, Mike [1 ]
Solomon, Mike [1 ]
机构
[1] E Malling Res, E Malling ME19 6BJ, Kent, England
关键词
strawberry; tetranychus urticae; phytonemus pallidus; phytoseiids; neoseiulus californicus; neoseiulus cucumeris; neoseiulus aurescens; phytoseiulus persimilis; distribution; sampling;
D O I
10.1007/s10493-008-9151-0
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Extensive sampling of strawberry plants in everbearing and June-bearing strawberry plantations and on potted plants showed that different species of mites were spatially separated. Of the two phytophagous species recorded, Tetranychus urticae was most abundant on old leaves and Phytonemus pallidus on folded leaves and flower/fruit clusters. Predatory phytoseiid mites were found on all plant parts but different species were spatially separated; Neoseiulus cucumeris and N. aurescens were found mostly on folded leaves and clusters, and N. californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis on old and medium aged leaves. No Typhlodromus pyri were found in the field plantations. These patterns of distribution did not change over sampling dates in summer and early autumn. An understanding of this within-plant zonation of mite species is important when studying predator-prey interactions and when designing sampling strategies for strawberry. A programme to sample the entire mite system on strawberry should be stratified to include all the above mentioned parts of the plant. Different sampling protocols, as appropriate, are required for sampling different pest species and their associated predators.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 306
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Inhibition of apical dominance affects boll spatial distribution, yield and fiber quality of field-grown cotton
    Zhang, Jing
    Han, Yingchun
    Li, Yabing
    Li, Xiaofei
    Wang, Guoping
    Wang, Zhanbiao
    Du, Wenli
    Feng, Lu
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2021, 173
  • [32] PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF FIELD-GROWN STRAWBERRY DURING 2 FRUITING SEASONS AND FLOWER BUD DIFFERENTIATION
    STRIK, BC
    PROCTOR, JTA
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 1988, 23 (03) : 820 - 821
  • [33] ROOT PRINTS - A TECHNIQUE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE INSITU SPATIAL-DISTRIBUTION OF BACTERIA ON THE RHIZOPLANE OF FIELD-GROWN PLANTS
    STANGHELLINI, ME
    RASMUSSEN, SL
    [J]. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1989, 79 (10) : 1131 - 1134
  • [34] Effects of shading on spatial distribution of flower and flower abscission in field-grown three soybeans in Northern China
    Liu Bing
    Qu De-Ning
    [J]. EMIRATES JOURNAL OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2015, 27 (08): : 629 - 635
  • [35] Soil fumigation, fruit production, and dry matter partitioning of field-grown strawberry plants
    Larson, KD
    Shaw, DV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1996, 121 (06) : 1137 - 1140
  • [36] REDUCTION OF BACTERIAL-CONTAMINATION IN FIELD-GROWN STRAWBERRY SHOOT-TIP CULTURES
    SKIRVIN, RM
    LARSON, D
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 1978, 13 (03) : 349 - 349
  • [37] Distribution of sludge-borne manganese in field-grown maize
    Jarausch-Wehrheim, B
    Mocquot, B
    Mench, M
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2000, 31 (3-4) : 305 - 319
  • [38] DISTRIBUTION OF PYTHIUM-APHANIDERMATUM IN THE RHIZOPLANE OF FIELD-GROWN SUGARBEETS
    STANGHELLINI, ME
    [J]. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1982, 72 (07) : 996 - 996
  • [39] TEMPORAL CHANGES IN PROTEOLYTIC ACTIVITIES IN LEAVES OF FIELD-GROWN SOYBEAN PLANTS
    RAGSTER, L
    CHRISPEELS, MJ
    ANDERSEN, J
    HAGEMAN, RH
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1978, 61 (04) : 27 - 27
  • [40] Localised insecticide treatment for the control of vine weevil larvae (Otiorhynchus sulcatus) on field-grown strawberry
    Cross, JV
    Burgess, CM
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 1997, 16 (06) : 565 - 574