Catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis

被引:57
|
作者
Comerota, AJ [1 ]
Kagan, SA [1 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
关键词
catheter-directed thrombolysis; iliofemoral DVT; phlegmasia cerulea dolens; thrombolytic therapy;
D O I
10.1007/s005230070014
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a serious venous thrombotic disorder with potentially morbid post-thrombotic sequelae. The purpose of this report is to present our single-centre evolution of technique and the results of catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of acute iliofemoral DVT, and put it into perspective with current literature. Patients and methods: Between May 1988 and April 2000, 54 patients were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis for occlusive iliofemoral and vena caval thrombosis. Average age was 45 years (range 17-68 years) and the duration of leg symptoms was 5.2 days (range 2-30 days). Routine vena caval filters were not used, although caval filters were inserted in patients with irregular and non-occlusive vena caval thrombus. Initially, urokinase infusion via a right jugular vein and/or contralateral femoral vein approach was used, delivering a 250 000-500 000 U bolus followed by continuous infusion of 250 000-300 000 U/h. Catheter delivery has evolved to an ultrasound-guided popliteal or posterior tibial vein puncture and the use of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator at a bolus dose of 4-8 mg followed by 2-4 mg/h. All patients received heparin infusion at 500-1000 U/h. Results: Fifty-one of the: 54 patients had successful catheter positioning. Forty-five (83%) had a successful outcome. Of those that failed, 2 were treated with a known chronic occlusion and in 2 patients plasminogen deficiency was suspected. Two patients had persistent iliac vein lesions which led to early re-thrombosis. Overall, 14 (26%) were asymptomatic, 28 (52%) demonstrated moderate improvement, 6 (11%) showed mild improvement and 6 (11%) had no clinical improvement. Serious complications occurred in 5 patients (9%). Four (7%) required blood transfusion and 1 (2%) required operative evacuation of an inguinal haematoma with repair of the common femoral vein. Eight patients (15%) developed a puncture site haematoma and 1 patient (2%) had a guidewire perforation of the common femoral vein. Conclusions: Catheter-directed thrombolysis is the preferred treatment for symptomatic iliofemoral DVT. Following successful lysis, residual iliac vein lesions should be corrected with balloon angioplasty and stenting if necessary. Considering the current results and those of contemporary series, a successful outcome can be anticipated in 80-85% of patients, with a significant improvement in quality of life when compared with standard anticoagulation.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 155
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis of Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis Reduces Deep Vein Thrombosis Recurrence
    Aziz, F.
    Chen, J. T.
    Comerota, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 (01) : 252 - 252
  • [32] Indications for Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Management of Acute Proximal Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Patterson, Benjamin O.
    Hinchliffe, Robert
    Loftus, Ian M.
    Thompson, Matt M.
    Holt, Peter J. E.
    ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY, 2010, 30 (04) : 669 - 674
  • [33] Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: our case series
    Rabuffi, P.
    Vagnarelli, S.
    Bruni, A.
    Gallucci, M.
    Ambrogi, C.
    Passaro, G.
    Flore, R. A.
    Tondi, P.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 23 (05) : 2244 - 2252
  • [34] Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis in a large study population
    Budak, Ali Baran
    Gunertem, Orhan Eren
    Ozisik, Kanat
    Gunaydin, Serdar
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2022, 10 (04) : 818 - 825
  • [35] A STRATEGY OF AGGRESSIVE REGIONAL THERAPY FOR ACUTE ILIOFEMORAL VENOUS THROMBOSIS WITH CONTEMPORARY VENOUS THROMBECTOMY OR CATHETER-DIRECTED THROMBOLYSIS
    COMEROTA, AJ
    ALDRIDGE, SC
    COHEN, G
    BALL, DS
    PLISKIN, M
    WHITE, JV
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1994, 20 (02) : 244 - 254
  • [36] Catheter-directed thrombolysis versus full anticoagulation alone in treating proximal iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis
    Mousa, Albeir Y.
    Broce, Mike
    VASCULAR, 2017, 25 (01) : 111 - 112
  • [37] Catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis improves health-related quality of life
    Comerota, AJ
    Throm, RC
    Mathias, SD
    Haughton, S
    Mewissen, M
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 32 (01) : 130 - 137
  • [38] Catheter-directed thrombolysis for the management of postpartum deep venous thrombosis
    Acharya, G
    Singh, K
    Hansen, JB
    Kumar, S
    Maltau, JM
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 84 (02) : 155 - 158
  • [39] US-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis
    Dumantepe, Mert
    Tarhan, Arif
    Yurdakul, Ilhan
    Ozler, Azmi
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 19 (03) : 251 - 258
  • [40] Analysis of the efficacy of angiojet percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis versus catheter-directed thrombolysis alone in the treatment of subacute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis in elderly patients
    Cong, Luyi
    Huang, Lihua
    Fan, Benfang
    Hong, Xin
    Ma, Lingyu
    Huang, Tianan
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2025, 40 (02) : 88 - 94