Similarities and differences in O2 chemisorption on graphene nanoribbon vs. carbon nanotube

被引:44
|
作者
Silva-Tapia, Alejandro B. [2 ]
Garcia-Carmona, Ximena [2 ]
Radovic, Ljubisa R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Concepcion, Dept Chem Engn, Concepcion, Chile
关键词
HETEROGENEOUS CO2 EVOLUTION; OXYGEN-ADSORPTION; MOLECULAR-OXYGEN; ACTIVE-SITES; OXIDATION; MECHANISM; GRAPHITE; 1ST-PRINCIPLES; DEPENDENCE; SURFACES;
D O I
10.1016/j.carbon.2011.10.028
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A computational chemistry study was conducted to reveal similarities and differences in the adsorption of molecular oxygen on the edge sites of a carbon nanotube (CNT) and a graphene nanoribbon. Two prototypical CNT molecules with a carbene and a carbyne active site were selected, and this in turn defined two corresponding graphene molecules obtained by CNT unzipping. Their electronic and thermochemical properties before and after O-2 adsorption were compared using density functional theory at the B3LYP/3-21G' level, as implemented in the Gaussian03 software. The sensitivity of the results to the basis set used and the selected CNT diameter was also assessed. Despite significant curvature in a subnanometer-diameter CNT, more similarities than differences were revealed with respect to graphene, both in their charge density distributions and thermochemical properties. Contrary to intuitive expectations, the intrinsic activity of an edge site (at least in the prototypical O-2 chemisorption process) is therefore not significantly modified when graphene is rolled up into a nanotube possessing a relatively large degree of pyramidalization. Greater differences exist between armchair and zigzag edges in both CNT and graphene. Both undergo a two-step mechanism of O-2 adsorption, but O-2 dissociates only on the armchair edge. Non-dissociative adsorption on an isolated zigzag site has both a lower affinity and a higher activation energy than the dissociative adsorption on the armchair site. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1152 / 1162
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Morphology of a graphene nanoribbon encapsulated in a carbon nanotube
    Furuhashi, F.
    Shintani, K.
    [J]. AIP ADVANCES, 2013, 3 (09):
  • [2] Helical Encapsulation of Graphene Nanoribbon into Carbon Nanotube
    Jiang, Yanyan
    Li, Hui
    Li, Yunfang
    Yu, Haiqing
    Liew, Kim M.
    He, Yezeng
    Liu, Xiangfa
    [J]. ACS NANO, 2011, 5 (03) : 2126 - 2133
  • [3] Graphene nanoribbon winding around carbon nanotube
    Savin, A. V.
    Korznikova, E. A.
    Dmitriev, S. V.
    Soboleva, E. G.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2017, 135 : 99 - 108
  • [5] siRNA vs. shRNA: Similarities and differences
    Rao, Donald D.
    Vorhies, John S.
    Senzer, Neil
    Nemunaitis, John
    [J]. ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 2009, 61 (09) : 746 - 759
  • [6] Performance Prediction of Graphene Nanoribbon and Carbon Nanotube Transistors
    Tan, Michael Loong Peng
    Amaratunga, Gehan A. J.
    [J]. ENABLING SCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 1341 : 365 - +
  • [7] Electrodeposited vs. consolidated nanocrystals: Differences and similarities
    Erb, U
    Palumbo, G
    Szpunar, B
    Aust, KT
    [J]. NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS, 1997, 9 (1-8): : 261 - 270
  • [8] Human vs. Mouse Nociceptors - Similarities and Differences
    Rostock, Charlotte
    Schrenk-Siemens, Katrin
    Pohle, Joerg
    Siemens, Jan
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 387 : 13 - 27
  • [9] A carbon nanotube-graphene nanoribbon seamless junction transistor
    Sagade, Abhay A.
    Nyayadhish, Ameya
    [J]. NANOSCALE ADVANCES, 2020, 2 (02): : 659 - 663
  • [10] Graphene Nanoribbon Aerogels Unzipped from Carbon Nanotube Sponges
    Peng, Qingyu
    Li, Yibin
    He, Xiaodong
    Gui, Xuchun
    Shang, Yuanyuan
    Wang, Chunhui
    Wang, Chao
    Zhao, Wenqi
    Du, Shanyi
    Shi, Enzheng
    Li, Peixu
    Wu, Dehai
    Cao, Anyuan
    [J]. ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2014, 26 (20) : 3241 - +