Machine learning for quality assessment of ground-based optical images of satellites

被引:0
|
作者
Kyono, Trent [1 ,2 ]
Lucas, Jacob [1 ]
Werth, Michael [1 ]
Calef, Brandoch [1 ]
McQuaid, Ian [3 ]
Fletcher, Justin [3 ]
机构
[1] Boeing Co, Kihei, HI 96753 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] US Air Force, Res Lab, Kihei, HI USA
关键词
neural networks; machine vision; image quality; image analysis; telescopes; AMPLITUDE CORRELATION-FUNCTION; ANALYTICAL EXPRESSIONS; WAVE-PROPAGATION; RESOLUTION; GALAXIES;
D O I
10.1117/1.OE.59.5.051403
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Astronomical images collected by ground-based telescopes suffer from degradation and perturbations attributed to atmospheric turbulence. We investigate the application of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to ground-based satellite imaging to address two existing problems. First, the multiframe blind deconvolution (MFBD) algorithms that can extract wellresolved images from these degraded data frames are computationally expensive, requiring supercomputing infrastructure for relatively fast performance and currently cannot be done in real time. Because of this, it is difficult to optimize collection parameters to maximize the likelihood of producing a resolved image with MFBD. Second, the space-object National Imagery Interpretability Rating Scale (SNIIRS) allows human analysts to provide a quantitative score of image quality based on identification of target features. It is naturally difficult to automate this scoring process, not only because the scale is based on identifiable features but also because the images may be in an almost-resolved image quality regime that is difficult to handle for traditional computer vision techniques. For both applications, we present our results using CNNs on data collected at the Maui Space Surveillance Site as well as a new synthetic dataset we introduce containing over a million SNIIRS rated pairings of perturbed and pristine groundbased satellite images. (C) 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diffraction losses in ground-based optical interferometers
    Horton, AJ
    Buscher, DF
    Haniff, CA
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 327 (01) : 217 - 226
  • [32] Detecting Blurred Ground-based Sky/Cloud Images
    Jain, Mayank
    Jain, Navya
    Lee, Yee Hui
    Winkler, Stefan
    Dev, Soumyabrata
    [J]. 2021 IEEE USNC-URSI RADIO SCIENCE MEETING (JOINT WITH AP-S SYMPOSIUM), 2021, : 61 - 62
  • [33] SIMULATION OF GROUND-BASED INFRARED CLOUDY SKY IMAGES
    LASHANSKY, SN
    BENYOSEF, N
    WEITZ, A
    [J]. OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 32 (06) : 1290 - 1297
  • [34] Optical technologies for the future of ground-based detectors
    Man, CN
    [J]. CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2003, 20 (10) : S117 - S125
  • [35] Ground-based optical interferometry: A practical primer
    Haniff, Chris
    [J]. NEW ASTRONOMY REVIEWS, 2007, 51 (8-9) : 583 - 596
  • [36] Algorithms for Cloud Segmentation with Ground-based Camera Images
    Hensel, Stefan
    Marinov, Marin B.
    Schwarz, Raphael
    Ganev, Borislav
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 SEVENTH BALKAN CONFERENCE ON LIGHTING (BALKANLIGHT), 2018, : 148 - 153
  • [37] Segmentation Algorithms for Ground-Based Infrared Cloud Images
    Terren-Serrano, Guillermo
    Martinez-Ramon, Manel
    [J]. 2021 IEEE PES INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGY EUROPE (ISGT EUROPE 2021), 2021, : 7 - 12
  • [38] FOCUSING ALGORITHMS ANALYSIS FOR GROUND-BASED SAR IMAGES
    Guccione, P.
    Zonno, M.
    Mascolo, L.
    Nico, G.
    [J]. 2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2013, : 3895 - 3898
  • [39] Attitude Estimation for Box-Wing Spacecraft Using Ground-Based Optical Telescope Images
    Yang, Cheng
    Li, Xie
    Li, Zhi-Hui
    Sun, Jun
    [J]. Yuhang Xuebao/Journal of Astronautics, 2020, 41 (04): : 456 - 463
  • [40] LEARNER TRANSLATION QUALITY ASSESSMENT BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING
    Qin, Ying
    Jiang, Jinlin
    Specia, Lucia
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING 2015 AND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND AGENTS 2015 AND THEORY AND PRACTICE IN MODERN COMPUTING 2015, 2015, : 117 - 124