Distal femoral fractures The need to review the standard of care

被引:90
|
作者
Smith, James R. A. [1 ]
Halliday, Ruth [1 ]
Aquilina, Alexander L. [2 ]
Morrison, Rory J. M. [3 ]
Yip, Grace C. K. [4 ]
McArthur, John [2 ]
Hull, Peter [4 ]
Gray, Andrew [3 ]
Kelly, Michael B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Southmead Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Bristol BS10 5NB, Avon, England
[2] Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Coventry CV2 2DX, W Midlands, England
[3] Royal Victoria Infirm, Dept Orthopaed, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4LP, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrooks Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
关键词
Distal femoral; Fracture; Femur; Supracondylar; FEMUR FRACTURES; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; LOCKING PLATES; HIP FRACTURE; FIXATION; MORTALITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; NAIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.016
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Hip fracture care has evolved, largely due to standardisation of practice, measurement of outcomes and the introduction of the Best Practice Tariff, leading to the sustained improvements documented by the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). The treatment of distal femoral fractures in this population has not had the same emphasis. This study defines the epidemiology, current practice and outcomes of distal femoral fractures in four English centres. Patients and methods: 105 patients aged 50 years or greater with a distal femoral fracture, presenting to four UK major trauma centres between October 2010 and September 2011 were identified. Data was collected using an adapted NHFD data collection tool via retrospective case note and radiograph review. Local ethics approval was obtained. Results: Mean age was 77 years (range 50-99), with 86% female. 95% of injuries were sustained from a low energy mechanism, and 72% were classified as either 33-A1 or 33-C1. The mean Parker mobility score and Barthel Independence Index were 5.37 (0-9) and 75.5 (0-100) respectively. Operative management was performed in 84%, and 86% had their surgery within 36 h. Three quarters were fixed with a peri-articuar locking plate. There was no consensus on post operative rehabilitation, but no excess of complications in the centres where weight bearing as tolerated was the standard. 45% were seen by an orthogeriatrician during their admission. Mean length of stay was 29 days. Mortality at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year was 7%, 16% and 18% respectively. Discussion: This study demonstrates that the distal femoral and hip fracture populations are similar, and highlights the current disparity in their management. The metrics and standards of care currently applied to hip fractures should be applied to the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Optimal operative treatment and rehabilitation remains unclear, and is in need of further research. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1088
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The clinical and radiological outcomes of the LISS plate for distal femoral fractures: A systematic review
    Smith, T. O.
    Hedges, C.
    MacNair, R.
    Schankat, K.
    Wimhurst, J. A.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2009, 40 (10): : 1049 - 1063
  • [32] Very Distal Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures: Replacement Versus Fixation: A Systematic Review
    Rubinger, Luc
    Khalik, Hassaan Abdel
    Gazendam, Aaron
    Wolfstadt, Jesse
    Khoshbin, Amir
    Tushinski, Daniel
    Johal, Herman
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2021, 35 (11) : 573 - 583
  • [33] Locking plate fixation of distal femoral fractures is a challenging technique: a retrospective review
    Toro, Giuseppe
    Calabro, Giampiero
    Toro, Antonio
    de Sire, Alessandro
    Iolascon, Giovanni
    CLINICAL CASES IN MINERAL AND BONE METABOLISM, 2015, 12 : 55 - 58
  • [34] The Olerud Extensile Anterior Approach for Complex Distal Femoral Fractures: A Systematic Review
    Khlopas, Anton
    Samuel, Linsen T.
    Sultan, Assem A.
    Yao, Benjamin
    Billow, Damien G.
    Kamath, Atul F.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (08) : 822 - 827
  • [35] FRACTURES OF DISTAL FEMORAL EPIPHYSES - FACTORS INFLUENCING PROGNOSIS - REVIEW OF 34 CASES
    LOMBARDO, SJ
    HARVEY, JP
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1977, 59 (06): : 742 - 751
  • [36] Noncontiguous fractures of the femoral neck, femoral shaft, and distal femur
    Barei, DP
    Schildhauer, TA
    Nork, SE
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 55 (01): : 80 - 86
  • [37] Our Management of Distal Femoral Comminuted Fractures with Femoral Defects
    Zhou, Andrew
    Jou, Eric
    Patel, Shaan
    Lu, Victor
    Zhang, James
    Krkovic, Matija
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109
  • [38] FRACTURES INVOLVING THE DISTAL FEMORAL EPIPHYSEAL PLATE
    SALTER, RB
    CZITROM, AA
    WILLIS, RB
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1979, 61 (02): : 248 - 248
  • [39] Distal femoral arthroplasty for native knee fractures
    Aebischer, A. S.
    Hau, R.
    de Steiger, R. N.
    Holder, C.
    Wall, C. J.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2022, 104B (07): : 894 - 901
  • [40] DISTAL FEMORAL FRACTURES, RESULTS OF OPERATIVE TREATMENT
    VANDERWERKEN, C
    MARTI, RK
    RAAYMAKERS, ELFB
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 33 (05): : 230 - 236