Utility of the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in the Treatment of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding and Dysmenorrhea: A Narrative Review

被引:8
|
作者
Bianchi, Paola [1 ]
Guo, Sun-Wei [2 ,3 ]
Habiba, Marwan [4 ]
Benagiano, Giuseppe [5 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, St Andrea Hosp, Dept Medicosurg Sci & Translat Med, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai OB GYN Hosp, Shanghai 200011, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Key Lab Female Reprod Endocrine Related, Shanghai 200011, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Leicester, Univ Hosp Leicester, Dept Hlth Sci, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[5] Sapienza Univ Rome, Fac Med & Dent, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
abnormal uterine bleeding; amenorrhea; dysmenorrhea; levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system; Progestasert; MENSTRUAL BLOOD-LOSS; RECEPTOR ISOFORM B; ADENOMYOSIS-ASSOCIATED MENORRHAGIA; NON-CONTRACEPTIVE USES; DRUG-DELIVERY SYSTEM; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FACTOR-KAPPA-B; MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; HUMAN ENDOMETRIUM; LNG-IUS;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11195836
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: We undertook a literature review of the use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices when utilized for heavy menstrual bleeding and/or dysmenorrhea. Methods: A narrative review of articles in the Scopus and Medline databases was conducted. Results: A number of options exist for the management of both abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and dysmenorrhea, and evidence is accumulating that the insertion of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) represents a useful option for their long-term treatment. The idea of using a progestogen released in utero was initially conceived to achieve long-term contraception, but it was quickly found that these systems could be utilized for a number of therapeutic applications. The first device to be made commercially available, Progestasert, was withdrawn from the market because, in the event of contraceptive failure, it caused a disproportionate percentage of extrauterine pregnancies. On the other hand, the LNG-IUS continues to be successfully utilized in its various variants, releasing 20, 13, or 8 mu g/day. These devices have a respective duration of action of 7 (possibly 8), 5, and 3 years, and there exist versions of frameless systems affixed to the myometrium of the uterine fundus. In the present review, following a brief description of the major causes of AUB and dysmenorrhea, the molecular bases for the use of the LNG-IUS are summarized. This is followed by a compendium of its use in AUB and dysmenorrhea, concluding that the insertion of the system improves the quality of life, reduces menstrual blood loss better than other medical therapies, and decreases the extent of dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain. In addition, there is no evidence of a significant difference in these outcomes when the use of the LNG-IUS was compared with improvements offered by endometrial ablation or hysterectomy. Possibly, the most important mechanism of action of the system consists of its ability to induce amenorrhea, which effectively eliminates heavy bleeding and dysmenorrhea. However, no method is ideal for every woman, and, in the case of the LNG-IUS, younger age and severe dysmenorrhea seem to be associated with a higher risk of discontinuation. Conclusion: The higher-dose LNG-IUS is a useful tool for HMB and dysmenorrhea in women of all ages. The low cost and ease of use make the LNG-IUS an attractive option, especially when contraception is also desired.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women with endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea
    Bahamondes, Luis
    Petta, Carlos A.
    Fernandes, Arlete
    Monteiro, Ilza
    CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 75 (06) : S134 - S139
  • [32] Role of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in dysmenorrhea due to adenomyosis and the influence on ovarian function
    Ji, Fei
    Yang, Xin-Hua
    AiLi, AiXingZi
    TuerXun, HaNiKeZi
    He, Yan
    Ding, Yan
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 41 (06): : 677 - 680
  • [33] Effects of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and T380A intrauterine copper device on dysmenorrhea and days of bleeding in women with and without adenomyosis
    Kelekci, Sefa
    Kelekci, Kiymet Handan
    Yilmaz, Bulent
    CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 86 (05) : 458 - 463
  • [34] The effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in menorrhagia: a systematic review
    Stewart, A
    Cummins, C
    Gold, L
    Jordan, R
    Phillips, W
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (01): : 74 - 86
  • [35] Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use in premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine leiomyoma: A systematic review
    Jiang, Wenxiao
    Shen, Qi
    Chen, Miaomiao
    Wang, Ying
    Zhou, Qingfeng
    Zhu, Xuejie
    Zhu, Xuegiong
    STEROIDS, 2014, 86 : 69 - 78
  • [36] The effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in menorrhagia: a systematic review
    Hurskainen, R
    Paavonen, J
    Teperi, J
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2003, 110 (01) : 87 - 88
  • [37] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF LEVONORGESTREL-RELEASING INTRAUTERINE SYSTEM (LNG-IUS) FOR THE TREATMENT OF DYSFUNCTIONAL UTERINE BLEEDING (DUB) IN SPAIN
    Lete, I
    Cristobal, I
    Febrer, L.
    Crespo, C.
    Hernandez, F. J.
    Arbat, A.
    Serrano, D.
    Brosa, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A423 - A423
  • [38] Re: The use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for the treatment of menorrhagia in women with inherited bleeding disorders
    Curtis, R
    Inki, P
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (02) : 248 - 249
  • [39] Gynaecological aspects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
    Sturridge, F
    Guillebaud, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (03): : 285 - 289
  • [40] Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: uses and controversies
    Bahamondes, Luis
    Bahamondes, M. Valeria
    Monteiro, Ilza
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2008, 5 (04) : 437 - 445