Autonomous Exploration Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Using D* Lite Algorithm

被引:4
|
作者
Zagradjanin, Novak [1 ]
Pamucar, Dragan [2 ]
Jovanovic, Kosta [1 ]
Knezevic, Nikola [1 ]
Pavkovic, Bojan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Sch Elect Engn, Belgrade 11120, Serbia
[2] Univ Def, Mil Acad, Dept Logist, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
[3] Mil Tech Inst, Belgrade 11030, Serbia
来源
关键词
Exploration strategies; multi-criteria decision-making; SAW; COPRAS; TOPSIS; STRATEGIES; NAVIGATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.32604/iasc.2022.021979
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
An autonomous robot is often in a situation to perform tasks or missions in an initially unknown environment. A logical approach to doing this implies discovering the environment by the incremental principle defined by the applied exploration strategy. A large number of exploration strategies apply the technique of selecting the next robot position between candidate locations on the frontier between the unknown and the known parts of the environment using the function that combines different criteria. The exploration strategies based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) using the standard SAW, COPRAS and TOPSIS methods are presented in the paper. Their performances are evaluated in terms of the analysis and comparison of the influence that each one of them has on the efficiency of exploration in environments with a different risk level of a "bad choice" in the selection of the next robot position. The simulation results show that, due to its characteristics related to the intention to minimize risk, the application of TOPSIS can provide a good exploration strategy in environments with a high level of considered risk. No significant difference is found in the application of the analyzed MCDM methods in the exploration of environments with a low level of considered risk. Also, the results confirm that MCDM-based exploration strategies achieve better results than strategies when only one criterion is used, regardless of the characteristics of the environment. The famous D* Lite algorithm is used for path planning.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / 1386
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Deadline based task scheduling using multi-criteria decision-making in cloud environment
    Nayak, Suvendu Chandan
    Tripathy, Chitaranjan
    [J]. AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2018, 9 (04) : 3315 - 3324
  • [32] An extension of fuzzy decision maps for multi-criteria decision-making
    Elomda, Basem Mohamed
    Hefny, Hesham Ahmed
    Hassan, Hesham Ahmed
    [J]. EGYPTIAN INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2013, 14 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [33] Multi-criteria Decision-Making Based Classifier Ensemble by Using Prioritized Aggregation Operator
    Debnath, Chandrima
    Guha, Debashree
    Hait, Swati Rani
    Guria, Soumita
    Chakraborty, Debjani
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, PREMI 2023, 2023, 14301 : 98 - 105
  • [34] An original multi-criteria decision-making algorithm for solar panels selection in buildings
    El-Bayeh, Claude Ziad
    Alzaareer, Khaled
    Brahmi, Brahim
    Zellagui, Mohamed
    Eicker, Ursula
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 217
  • [35] Implementation of Dijkstra Algorithm and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Optimal Route Distribution
    Rosita, Yesy Diah
    Rosyida, Erly Ekayanti
    Rudiyanto, Muhammad Adik
    [J]. FIFTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2019, 161 : 378 - 385
  • [36] Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making to optimise solid waste management
    Garcia-Garcia G.
    [J]. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2022, 37
  • [37] Deconstruction plan assessment using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Chen, Z
    Abdullah, A
    Anumba, C
    Li, H
    Xu, Q
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2: CHALLENGE OF INNOVATION IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE, 2005, : 465 - 469
  • [38] Improving the Explainability of Multi-criteria Decision-Making Using Neutrosophic Logic
    Yusuf, Hesham
    Yang, Kai
    Panoutsos, George
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, UKCI 2022, 2024, 1454 : 551 - 562
  • [39] Using virtual environments and agent models in multi-criteria decision-making
    Bishop, Ian D.
    Stock, Christian
    Williams, Kathryn J.
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2009, 26 (01) : 87 - 94
  • [40] Multi-criteria decision-making toward supplier selection: exploration of PROMETHEE II method
    Agrawal, Nishant
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 29 (07) : 2122 - 2146