A comparison of coagulant dosing options for the remediation of molasses process water

被引:40
|
作者
Ryan, Daniel [1 ]
Gadd, Andrew [1 ]
Kavanagh, John [1 ]
Zhou, Minghua [1 ]
Barton, Geoff [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
chemical flocculation; electrocoagulation; wastewater remediation; melanoidins;
D O I
10.1016/j.seppur.2007.05.010
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Effluents arising from molasses fermentation are highly coloured and carry a large organic load. Existing anaerobic/aerobic biological treatments effectively reduce the biological oxygen demand (BOD), but are unable to decolourise or remove the colour associated chemical oxygen demand (COD) from the wastewaters. This study investigated the remediation efficacy of chemical flocculation and electrocoagulation, the process whereby sacrificial anodes corrode to release active coagulant precursors into solution. The chemical flocculants used Al-s(SO4)Z and FeCl3 have an optimum dosage concentrations, above and below which they are less effective. Both removed almost 90% of the colour and up to 80% of the COD, although this was dependant on effluent quality. Altering the pH alone was also shown to cause colour removal. Electrocoagulation using sacrificial iron or aluminium anodes was as effective as chemical flocculation in reducing colour and COD. The bubbles of hydrogen from the cathode floated almost all the coagulated material to the surface of the reactor, facilitating separation. Particle size distributions of the treated wastewater were measured by laser diffraction. The volume-based frequency distribution made it clear that both chemical flocculation and electrocoagulation resulted in considerable aggregation. A linear relationship between colour and COD removal was demonstrated. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 352
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of surrogate models with different methods in groundwater remediation process
    Jiannan Luo
    Wenxi Lu
    Journal of Earth System Science, 2014, 123 : 1579 - 1589
  • [42] Wash water in waterworks:contaminants and process options for reclamation
    C B Chidambara Raj
    Tan Ee Kwong
    Soh Hoo Tiong
    Paul Stefan Klose
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2008, (11) : 1300 - 1305
  • [43] Wash water in waterworks: contaminants and process options for reclamation
    Raj, C. B. Chidambara
    Kwong, Tan Ee
    Cheng, Wong Wai
    Fong, Lee Mun
    Tiong, Soh Hoo
    Klose, Paul Stefan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2008, 20 (11) : 1300 - 1305
  • [44] Remediation options and the significance of water treatment at former uranium production sites in Eastern Germany
    Gatzweiler, R
    Jakubick, AT
    Kiessig, G
    URANIUM 2000 - PROCESS METALLURGY OF URANIUM, 2000, : 731 - 748
  • [45] Remediation of contaminated water from nitrate and diazinon by nanofiltration process
    Mahmoodi, P.
    Borazjani, H. Hosseinzadeh
    Farhadian, M.
    Nazar, A. R. Solaimany
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2015, 53 (11) : 2948 - 2953
  • [46] Examination of flotation behavior of metal ions for process water remediation
    Yenial, Unzile
    Bulut, Gulay
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS, 2017, 241 : 130 - 135
  • [47] Coagulation efficiency comparison of natural and its blended coagulant with alum in water treatment
    Iqbal, A.
    Zahra, N.
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2018, 109 : 188 - 192
  • [48] Comparison of currently available PFAS remediation technologies in water: A review
    Wanninayake, Dushanthi M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 283
  • [49] Machine learning regression-based prediction model for the autonomous control of coagulant dosing in smart water purification plants
    Shin, Donggi
    Lee, Jong Yun
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (10) : 4036 - 4048
  • [50] Chitosan as natural coagulant in hybrid coagulation-nanofiltration membrane process for water treatment
    Ang, W. L.
    Mohammad, A. W.
    Benamor, A.
    Hilal, N.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 4 (04): : 4857 - 4862