Renewables and climate change mitigation: Irreversible energy investment under uncertainty and portfolio effects

被引:76
|
作者
Fuss, Sabine [1 ]
Szolgayova, Jana [1 ,2 ]
Khabarov, Nikolay [1 ]
Obersteiner, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] IIASA, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
[2] Comenius Univ, Dept Appl Math & Stat, Bratislava, Slovakia
关键词
Real options; Renewable energy; Portfolio theory; POWER-GENERATION; REAL OPTIONS; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.061
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Ongoing negotiations under the UNFCCC center around the possibilities for stabilization of greenhouse gases at a "safe" level. New energy technologies are assumed to make major contributions to this goal. However, in the light of scientific uncertainty (e.g. about climate sensitivity, feedback effects, etc.), market uncertainty (e.g. fuel price volatility), technological uncertainty (e.g. availability of renewable technology), socio-economic uncertainty (e.g. development of different macroeconomic factors) and policy uncertainty (e.g. about commitment to specific targets and stability of CO2 prices), it is difficult to assess the importance of different technologies in achieving robust long-term climate risk mitigation. One example currently debated in this context is biomass-based energy, which can be used to produce both carbon-neutral electricity and at the same time offer the possibility of "negative emissions" by capturing carbon from biomass combustion at the conversion facility and permanently storing it. In this study, we analyze the impact of uncertainty on investment decision-making at the plant level in a real options valuation framework, and then use the GCI Scenario Database (HASA, 2009) as a point of departure for deriving optimal technology portfolios across different socio-economic scenarios for a range of stabilization targets, focusing, in particular, on the new, low-emission targets using alternative risk measures. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 68
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Climate change, mitigation and adaptation with uncertainty and learning
    Ingham, Alan
    Ma, Jie
    Ulph, Alistair
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (11) : 5354 - 5369
  • [22] Leapfrogging over development? Promoting rural renewables for climate change mitigation
    Zerriffi, Hisham
    Wilson, Elizabeth
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (04) : 1689 - 1700
  • [23] Fluctuating renewables in a long-term climate change mitigation strategy
    Ludig, Sylvie
    Haller, Markus
    Schmid, Eva
    Bauer, Nico
    [J]. ENERGY, 2011, 36 (11) : 6674 - 6685
  • [24] Investment in Renewables under Uncertainty: Fitting a Feed-in Scheme into ETS
    Boffa, Federico
    Clo, Stefano
    D'Amato, Alessio
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 107 - 122
  • [25] Energy efficient campus landscaping for mitigation of climate change effects
    Ahmadzadeh, Reza
    Das, D. K.
    Sindhu, S. S.
    Sahoo, R. N.
    Prasad, K. V.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2016, 86 (11): : 1499 - 1503
  • [26] Investment under uncertainty and policy change
    Pawlina, G
    Kort, PM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2005, 29 (07): : 1193 - 1209
  • [27] Foreign direct investment and renewable energy in climate change mitigation: Does governance matter?
    Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu
    Adams, Samuel
    Leirvik, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 263
  • [28] Impact of Plant Utilization on Irreversible Investment Under Uncertainty with Application to Refinery Investment
    Omosigho, S. E.
    Enoyoze, E.
    Ekhosuehi, V. U.
    [J]. CROATIAN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2021, 12 (01) : 49 - 59
  • [29] IRREVERSIBLE INVESTMENT UNDER LEVY UNCERTAINTY: AN EQUATION FOR THE OPTIMAL BOUNDARY
    Ferrari, Giorgio
    Salminen, Paavo
    [J]. ADVANCES IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2016, 48 (01) : 298 - 314
  • [30] The impact of operational delay on irreversible investment under Knightian uncertainty
    Delaney, Laura
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2022, 215