Association Between Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Nouri-Majd, Saeedeh [1 ]
Salari-Moghaddam, Asma [1 ]
Aminianfar, Azadeh [2 ]
Larijani, Bagher [3 ]
Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Nutr Sci & Dietet, Dept Community Nutr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Kashan Univ Med Sci, Res Ctr Biochem & Nutr Metab Dis, Kashan, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Endocrinol & Metab Mol Cellular Sci Inst, Obes & Eating Habits Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[4] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Nutr & Food Sci, Dept Community Nutr, Esfahan, Iran
来源
FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION | 2022年 / 9卷
关键词
red meat; processed meat; total meat; prostate cancer; meta-analysis; DIETARY PATTERNS; TREND ESTIMATION; ANIMAL PRODUCTS; CALCIUM; COHORT; PREVENTION; POULTRY; FOODS; FAT; MEN;
D O I
10.3389/fnut.2022.801722
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Debate on the potential carcinogenic effects of meat intake is open and the relationship between meat consumption and risk of prostate cancer remains uncertain. This meta-analysis was conducted to summarize earlier prospective studies on the association of meat consumption with risk of prostate cancer.Methods: Relevant studies were identified by exploring PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases up to December 2020. Fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analyses were used for pooling the relative risks (RRs). Heterogeneity across studies was evaluated using the Q-statistic and I-square (I-2). A funnel plot and Egger's test was used to detect publication bias. Linear and non-linear dose-response analyses were performed to estimate the dose-response relations between meat intake and risk of prostate cancer.Results: Twenty-five prospective studies were included in this meta-analysis. Totally, 1,900,910 participants with 35,326 incident cases of prostate cancer were investigated. Pooling the eligible effect sizes, we observed that high consumption of processed meat might be associated with an increased risk of "total prostate cancer " (RR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.10; I-2 = 1.5%, P = 0.43) and "advanced prostate cancer " (1.17; 1.09, 1.26; I-2 = 58.8%, P = 0.01). However, the association between processed meat and "advanced prostate cancer " was not significant in the random-effects model: 1.12 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.29). A linear dose-response analysis indicated that an increment of 50 grams per day of processed meat intake might be related to a 4% greater risk of "total prostate cancer " (1.04; 1.00, 1.08; I-2 = 0.0%, P = 0.51). "Total meat intake " was marginally associated with all outcomes of prostate cancer risk (1.04; 1.01, 1.07; I-2 = 58.4%, P < 0.001).Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies indicated that increased consumption of "total meat " and "processed meat " might be associated with a higher risk of prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Association Between Consumption of Red and Processed Meat and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhao, Zhanwei
    Yin, Zifang
    Pu, Zhongshu
    Zhao, Qingchuan
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 15 (04) : 486 - +
  • [2] Red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Zhanwei
    Feng, Quanxin
    Yin, Zifang
    Shuang, Jianbo
    Bai, Bin
    Yu, Pengfei
    Guo, Min
    Zhao, Qingchuan
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (47) : 83306 - 83314
  • [3] Red and processed meat consumption and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Zhanwei
    Yin, Zifang
    Zhao, Qingchuan
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (18) : 30563 - 30575
  • [4] Red and processed meat consumption and esophageal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Z. Zhao
    F. Wang
    D. Chen
    C. Zhang
    [J]. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2020, 22 : 532 - 545
  • [5] Red and processed meat consumption and esophageal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Z.
    Wang, F.
    Chen, D.
    Zhang, C.
    [J]. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 22 (04): : 532 - 545
  • [6] Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nucci, Daniele
    Fatigoni, Cristina
    Amerio, Andrea
    Odone, Anna
    Gianfredi, Vincenza
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (18) : 1 - 20
  • [7] Consumption of red meat and processed meat and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
    Maryam S. Farvid
    Elkhansa Sidahmed
    Nicholas D. Spence
    Kingsly Mante Angua
    Bernard A. Rosner
    Junaidah B. Barnett
    [J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2021, 36 : 937 - 951
  • [8] Consumption of red meat and processed meat and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
    Farvid, Maryam S.
    Sidahmed, Elkhansa
    Spence, Nicholas D.
    Angua, Kingsly Mante
    Rosner, Bernard A.
    Barnett, Junaidah B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 36 (09) : 937 - 951
  • [9] Consumption of red and processed meat and esophageal cancer risk: Meta-analysis
    Choi, Yuni
    Song, Sujin
    Song, Yoonju
    Lee, Jung Eun
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (07) : 1020 - 1029
  • [10] Consumption of red and processed meat and esophageal cancer risk:Meta-analysis
    Yuni Choi
    Sujin Song
    Yoonju Song
    Jung Eun Lee
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, 19 (07) : 1020 - 1029