Facilitators and barriers for implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: An academic center's initial experience

被引:26
|
作者
Amini, Marzyeh [1 ]
Oemrawsingh, Arvind [1 ]
Verweij, Lisanne M. [2 ]
Lingsma, Hester F. [1 ]
Hazelzet, Jan A. [1 ]
Eijkenaar, Frank [3 ]
van Leeuwen, Nikki [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Ctr Med Decis Making, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; Surveys and questionnaires; Implementation; Value-based healthcare; Facilitators and barriers; Health services research; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH OUTCOMES; APPROVAL; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.07.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of healthcare providers and researchers in a large academic hospital on facilitators and barriers for implementing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical care. Methods A customized web-based questionnaire was developed and disseminated to healthcare providers and researchers across multiple medical departments involved in a value-based health care initiative in the hospital. Questionnaire statements were rated using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree". In addition, 8 open-ended questions were included allowing respondents to mention additional facilitators and barriers for implementing PROMs. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. Results In total, 61 participants from both surgical and non-surgical departments completed the survey. Most respondents (51%) were medical specialists and the median employment duration was 14 years. Frequently reported facilitators were the presence of a PROM coordinator in the (outpatient) clinic (85%), the integration of PROMs in the electronic health record (81%), and the intrinsic motivation of members involved in the implementation (N = 9 open responses). Commonly reported barriers were language barriers (76%), IT issues (N = 17 open responses), and time constraints (N = 14 open responses). Conclusions For the successful implementation of PROMs in clinical practice, it is imperative that healthcare organizations consider supporting motivated healthcare professionals, involving PROMs coordinators, and investing in an adequate IT infrastructure, and removal of language barriers. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页码:1247 / 1255
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An academic center's initial experience on facilitators and barriers for implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care
    Amini, Marzyeh
    Oemrawsingh, Arvind
    Verweij, Lisanne M.
    Lingsma, Hester F.
    Hazelzet, Jan A.
    Eijkenaar, Frank
    van Leeuwen, Nikki
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S76 - S76
  • [2] Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: A systematic review of facilitators and barriers
    Antunes, Barbara
    Harding, Richard
    Higginson, Irene J.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (02) : 158 - 175
  • [3] Understanding the barriers and facilitators to implementing patient-reported outcome measures in surgery
    Gibbons, Chris
    Tsengaris, Elena
    Dominici, Laura
    Pusic, Andrea
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 : S92 - S93
  • [4] Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review
    Glenwright, Ben G.
    Simmich, Joshua
    Cottrell, Michelle
    O'Leary, Shaun P.
    Sullivan, Clair
    Pole, Jason D.
    Russell, Trevor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [5] Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review
    Ben G. Glenwright
    Joshua Simmich
    Michelle Cottrell
    Shaun P. O’Leary
    Clair Sullivan
    Jason D. Pole
    Trevor Russell
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 7
  • [6] Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Monitoring in Gastrointestinal Surgery
    Iroz, Cassandra B.
    Johnson, Julie K.
    Ager, Meagan S.
    Joung, Rachel Hae-Soo
    Brajcich, Brian C.
    Cella, David
    Franklin, Patricia D.
    Holl, Jane L.
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    Merkow, Ryan P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 288 : 341 - 349
  • [7] Barriers and Facilitators When Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures at a Municipal Cancer Care Unit A Qualitative Study
    Skare, Terese S.
    Midtbust, May Helen
    Lund, Jo-asmund
    Kaasa, Stein
    Dreyer, Anne
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2023, 46 (04) : E268 - E275
  • [8] Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Breast Cancer Care: A Systematic Review
    van Egdom, Laurentine S. E.
    Oemrawsingh, Arvind
    Verweij, Lisanne M.
    Lingsma, Hester F.
    Koppert, Linetta B.
    Verhoef, Cornelis
    Klazinga, Niek S.
    Hazelzet, Jan A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (10) : 1197 - 1226
  • [9] Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Care: Rheumatologist Perspectives on Opportunities and Challenges
    Kasturi, Shanthini
    Wong, John
    Mandl, Lisa
    McAlindon, Timothy
    LeClair, Amy
    [J]. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 71
  • [10] Barriers and Benefits to the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Care: A Qualitative Study
    Philpot, Lindsey M.
    Barnes, Sunni A.
    Brown, Rachel M.
    Austin, Jessica A.
    James, Cameron S.
    Stanford, Richard H.
    Ebbert, Jon O.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2018, 33 (04) : 359 - 364