Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty

被引:130
|
作者
Zhang, Zaifang [1 ]
Chu, Xuening [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
Failure mode and effects analysis; Fuzzy risk priority numbers; Fuzzy weighted geometric mean; Nonlinear programming model; The method of imprecision; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; ENGINEERING DESIGN; FUZZY; FMEA; QFD;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.046
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a powerful tool for identifying and assessing potential failures. The tool has become increasingly important in new product development, manufacture or engineering applications. Generally, risk assessment in FMEA is carried out by using risk priority numbers (RPNs) which can be determined by evaluating three factors: occurrence (0), severity (S) and detection (D). Due to the vagueness and uncertainty existing in the evaluating process, crisp numbers representing RPNs in the traditional FMEA might be improper or insufficient in contrast to fuzzy numbers. Currently, the fuzzy methods and linear programming method have been proposed as an effective solution for the calculations of fuzzy RPNs. However, considering the fact that fuzzy RPNs are determined on a multidimensional scale spanning 0, S and D along with their interactions under a fuzzy environment, several gaps should be bridged in the evaluation, calculation, and ranking of fuzzy RPNs. First, decision makers tend to use multi-granularity linguistic term sets for expressing their assessments because of their different backgrounds and preferences. Second, numerical compensation may be existed among 0, S and D that can derive different RPNs in the engineering applications. Third, the complete ranking results for fuzzy RPNs may be easily changed by the effects of uncertain factors. In this study, a fuzzy-RPNs-based method integrating weighted least square method, the method of imprecision and partial ranking method is proposed to generate more accurate fuzzy RPNs and ensure to be robust against the uncertainty. A design example of new horizontal directional drilling machine is used for illustrating the application of the proposed approach. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 214
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A new risk prioritization model for failure mode and effects analysis
    Anes, V.
    Henriques, E.
    Freitas, M.
    Reis, L.
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 34 (04) : 516 - 528
  • [2] Case study of a Risk Prioritization in Failure Mode Effects and Critical Analysis Using MCDM
    Kahouadji, Housseyn
    Belkaid, Faycal
    [J]. 2022 14TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM OF LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT (LOGISTIQUA2022), 2022, : 438 - 443
  • [3] Enhanced Approach for Prioritisation of Failures in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Under Uncertainty
    Al-dalain, Reema
    Beithou, Nabil
    Khalid, Mohammad Bani
    Borowski, Gabriel
    Alsaqoor, Sameh
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2024, 18 (06) : 259 - 265
  • [4] An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    You, Jian-Xin
    Chen, Shouming
    Chen, Yi-Zeng
    [J]. IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2016, 48 (11) : 1027 - 1042
  • [5] A linguistic risk prioritization approach for failure mode and effects analysis: A case study of medical product development
    Wang, Liang
    Hu, Yu-Ping
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    Shi, Hua
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 35 (06) : 1735 - 1752
  • [6] Risk prioritization in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis using interval type-2 fuzzy sets
    Bozdag, Erhan
    Asan, Umut
    Soyer, Ayberk
    Serdarasan, Seyda
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (08) : 4000 - 4015
  • [7] Risk evaluation of photovoltaic power systems: An improved failure mode and effect analysis under uncertainty
    Li, Jing
    Zhang, Ying
    Fang, Hong
    Fang, Siran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 414
  • [8] Cloud model-based failure mode and effects analysis for prioritization of failures of power transformer in risk assessment
    Liao, Ruijin
    Bian, Jianpeng
    Yang, Lijun
    Grzybowski, Stanislaw
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2013, 23 (07): : 1172 - 1190
  • [9] A fuzzy rough number extended AHP and VIKOR for failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty
    Zhu, Guo-Niu
    Ma, Jin
    Hu, Jie
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2022, 51
  • [10] A hybrid risk prioritization approach in construction projects using failure mode and effective analysis
    Karamoozian, Amirhossein
    Wu, Desheng
    [J]. ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (09) : 2661 - 2686