Antihypertensive effects and safety of eprosartan: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:5
|
作者
Xu, Feng-Ying [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Bo [3 ]
Shi, Duo [4 ]
Li, Hao
Zou, Zui [1 ]
Shi, Xue-Yin [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai 200003, Peoples R China
[2] Second Mil Med Univ, Co Anesthesiol, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] Second Mil Med Univ, Co 10, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[4] Second Mil Med Univ, Dept Biochem Pharm, Sch Pharm, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Eprosartan; Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers; Antihypertensive agents; Hypertension; CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITORS; ONCE-DAILY EPROSARTAN; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BLOOD-PRESSURE; DOUBLE-BLIND; HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS; RECEPTOR BLOCKERS; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; ENALAPRIL; COMMITTEE;
D O I
10.1007/s00228-011-1107-3
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The benefits of reducing blood pressure (BP) have been well established, but uncertainty remains about the comparative effects of different BP-lowering regimens. We aimed to estimate the efficacy and the tolerability of eprosartan compared with other agents as monotherapy. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the criteria was performed using Review Manager and Stata/SE. Twenty-two articles were ultimately included out of 78 studies, involving 6,460 patients. Eprosartan had a greater systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction than placebo [weighted mean difference (WMD): 6.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.86-8.25] and losartan (WMD: 2.24, 95% CI 0.08-4.40) and a greater diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reduction than placebo (WMD 3.95, 95% CI 2.77-5.13). Therapeutic response rate of BP favored eprosartan [risk ratio (RR) 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.24] compared with enalapril. There were no statistical differences in SBP or DBP reductions comparing eprosartan with enalapril or telmisartan. Original RCTs included comparing eprosartan with valsartan and nitrendipine reported no differences in BP-lowering efficacy. Eprosartan monotherapy is equivalent to many first-line antihypertensive agents and is effective for the treatment of essential hypertension, especially for isolated systolic hypertension. The favorable efficacy and tolerability make eprosartan worthwhile to be taken into consideration by physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 205
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of aromatherapy on depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Cho, Kyeonga
    Kim, Myoungsuk
    [J]. GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 84 : 215 - 225
  • [22] Antihypertensive Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Olmesartan: An Updated Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Raja, Roomi
    Kumari, Sandhya
    Khan, Muhammad Umer
    Ayaz, Araib
    Jaffar, Duaa
    Mohamad, Zain
    Muzammil, Muhammad Ali
    Sohail, Nasira
    Qureshi, Saad Ahmed
    Saeed, Hamid
    Amin, Muhammad Fahad
    Jawad, Ansar
    Varrassi, Giustino
    Kumar, Satesh
    Khatri, Mahima
    Maryam, Areeba
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [23] Effects of different types of antihypertensive agents on arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Xiahuan
    Huang, Bo
    Liu, Meilin
    Li, Xueying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2015, 7 (12) : 2339 - 2347
  • [24] Hypertension: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Ken
    Kou, Xun
    Han, Yu
    Zhou, Lin
    Zeng, Chunyu
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 126 : 165 - 165
  • [25] The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Guo, Xiao Xia
    Wu, Hong Li
    Shia, Hong Yun
    Su, Lei
    Zhang, Xi
    [J]. CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 10 : 2553 - 2562
  • [26] Efficacy and Safety of Pitavastatin Versus Simvastatin: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhen Jiang
    Ren Rong Gong
    Li Qiu
    Qian Wang
    Mi Su
    Xiao Juan Liu
    Min Shan Hu
    Jia Lin
    Ding Zhi Fang
    [J]. Clinical Drug Investigation, 2014, 34 : 599 - 608
  • [27] Safety of Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Geiger-Gritsch, Sabine
    Stollenwerk, Bjoern
    Miksad, Rebecca
    Guba, Beate
    Wild, Claudia
    Siebert, Uwe
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2010, 15 (11): : 1179 - 1191
  • [28] Efficacy and Safety of Mipomersen in Treatment of Dyslipidemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Panta, Raju
    Dahal, Khagendra
    [J]. ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 2014, 35 (03)
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of sugarcane policosanol on dyslipidemia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gong, Jing
    Qin, Xin
    Yuan, Fen
    Hu, Meilin
    Chen, Guang
    Fang, Ke
    Wang, Dingkun
    Jiang, Shujun
    Li, Jingbin
    Zhao, Yan
    Huang, Zhaoyi
    Dong, Hui
    Lu, Fuer
    [J]. MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH, 2018, 62 (01)
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of adjunctive topiramate for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zheng, W.
    Xiang, Y. -T.
    Xiang, Y. -Q.
    Li, X. -B.
    Ungvari, G. S.
    Chiu, H. F. K.
    Correll, C. U.
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 134 (05) : 385 - 398