Antihypertensive effects and safety of eprosartan: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:5
|
作者
Xu, Feng-Ying [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Bo [3 ]
Shi, Duo [4 ]
Li, Hao
Zou, Zui [1 ]
Shi, Xue-Yin [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai 200003, Peoples R China
[2] Second Mil Med Univ, Co Anesthesiol, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] Second Mil Med Univ, Co 10, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[4] Second Mil Med Univ, Dept Biochem Pharm, Sch Pharm, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Eprosartan; Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers; Antihypertensive agents; Hypertension; CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITORS; ONCE-DAILY EPROSARTAN; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BLOOD-PRESSURE; DOUBLE-BLIND; HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS; RECEPTOR BLOCKERS; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; ENALAPRIL; COMMITTEE;
D O I
10.1007/s00228-011-1107-3
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The benefits of reducing blood pressure (BP) have been well established, but uncertainty remains about the comparative effects of different BP-lowering regimens. We aimed to estimate the efficacy and the tolerability of eprosartan compared with other agents as monotherapy. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the criteria was performed using Review Manager and Stata/SE. Twenty-two articles were ultimately included out of 78 studies, involving 6,460 patients. Eprosartan had a greater systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction than placebo [weighted mean difference (WMD): 6.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.86-8.25] and losartan (WMD: 2.24, 95% CI 0.08-4.40) and a greater diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reduction than placebo (WMD 3.95, 95% CI 2.77-5.13). Therapeutic response rate of BP favored eprosartan [risk ratio (RR) 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.24] compared with enalapril. There were no statistical differences in SBP or DBP reductions comparing eprosartan with enalapril or telmisartan. Original RCTs included comparing eprosartan with valsartan and nitrendipine reported no differences in BP-lowering efficacy. Eprosartan monotherapy is equivalent to many first-line antihypertensive agents and is effective for the treatment of essential hypertension, especially for isolated systolic hypertension. The favorable efficacy and tolerability make eprosartan worthwhile to be taken into consideration by physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 205
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Antihypertensive effects and safety of eprosartan: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Feng-Ying Xu
    Bo Yang
    Duo Shi
    Hao Li
    Zui Zou
    Xue-Yin Shi
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2012, 68 : 195 - 205
  • [2] Antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of trandolapril/verapamil combination: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Z Zou
    F-Y Xu
    L Wang
    M-M An
    H Zhang
    X-Y Shi
    [J]. Journal of Human Hypertension, 2011, 25 : 203 - 210
  • [3] Antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of trandolapril/verapamil combination: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zou, Z.
    Xu, F-Y
    Wang, L.
    An, M-M
    Zhang, H.
    Shi, X-Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2011, 25 (03) : 203 - 210
  • [4] Hydroxychloroquine safety: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Eljaaly, Khalid
    Alireza, Kasim Huseein
    Alshehri, Samah
    Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A.
    [J]. TRAVEL MEDICINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2020, 36
  • [5] The Antihypertensive Effects and Safety of LCZ696 in Patients with Hypertension: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Chua, Su-Kiat
    Lai, Wei-Ting
    Chen, Lung-Ching
    Hung, Huei-Fong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (13)
  • [6] SACUBITRIL/ VALSARTAN AS AN ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    De Vecchis, R.
    Soreca, S.
    Ariano, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2019, 21 (0E) : E93 - E94
  • [7] Antihypertensive Treatment and Central Arterial Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Cheng, Yi-Bang
    Xia, Jia-Hui
    Li, Yan
    Wang, Ji-Guang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [8] A Comparision of Nalbuphine with Morphine for Analgesic Effects and Safety : Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zheng Zeng
    Jianhua Lu
    Chang Shu
    Yuanli Chen
    Tong Guo
    Qing-ping Wu
    Shang-long Yao
    Ping Yin
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 5
  • [9] A Comparision of Nalbuphine with Morphine for Analgesic Effects and Safety : Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zeng, Zheng
    Lu, Jianhua
    Shu, Chang
    Chen, Yuanli
    Guo, Tong
    Wu, Qing-ping
    Yao, Shang-long
    Yin, Ping
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [10] Antihistamine effects and safety of fexofenadine: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Huang, Cheng-zhi
    Jiang, Zhi-hui
    Wang, Jian
    Luo, Yue
    Peng, Hua
    [J]. BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 20 (01):