Protecting the tax-exempt status of housing developers participating in low-income housing tax credit partnerships

被引:0
|
作者
Hussong, M
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) is an important source of federal funding for developers of affordable housing for low-income persons. Although for-profit and nonprofit developers compete for credits, the federal government reserves ten percent of the credits for nonprofit, tax-exempt developers. Exempt developers often sell the credits to for-profit investors, forming a partnership through which the exempt organization develops the housing and the investors receive tax benefits in exchange for capital contributions. The partnership formation, however, may jeopardize the tax-exempt status of the nonprofit organizations and result in the partnership losing the LIHTC. To maintain exempt status, the Internal Revenue Code requires that organizations be organized and operated to promote a charitable purpose and that no net earnings inure to private individuals. A combination of binding and non-binding authority provides confusing guidelines for exempt organizations seeking to protect their exempt status. This Comment examines the federal requirements for the award of LIHTC and traces the development and application of a two-prong test used by the Internal Revenue Service to determine whether partnership structures jeopardize exempt status. This Comment argues that exempt developers in LIHTC partnerships need binding authority that details the level of control of partnership activities the exempt organization must retain, provides an exception for certain partnership guarantees by exempt organizations that are standard within the development industry, and allows investors to receive private benefits to a greater degree without jeopardizing the organization's exempt status.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 277
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 10 STEPS TO PROTECTING YOUR TAX-EXEMPT STATUS NOW
    HYATT, TK
    HOSPITALS & HEALTH NETWORKS, 1993, 67 (18): : 72 - 72
  • [32] The market price of Low-Income Housing Tax Credits
    Eriksen, Michael D.
    JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2009, 66 (02) : 141 - 149
  • [33] The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, Community Development, and Fair Housing: A Response to Orfield et al.
    Schwartz, Alex
    HOUSING POLICY DEBATE, 2016, 26 (02) : 276 - 283
  • [34] Affordable housing through the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program and opioid overdose emergency department visits
    Durrance, Christine Piette
    Austin, Anna E.
    Runyan, Carol W.
    Runyan, Desmond K.
    Martin, Sandra L.
    Mercer, Jeremy
    Shanahan, Meghan E.
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE & ADDICTION TREATMENT, 2024, 158
  • [35] Input distortions in the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit: Evidence from building size
    Lang, Bree J.
    REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2015, 52 : 119 - 128
  • [36] Do Tenants Capture the Benefits from the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program?
    Burge, Gregory S.
    REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS, 2011, 39 (01) : 71 - 96
  • [37] Comparing Opportunity Metrics and Locational Outcomes in the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program
    Walter, Rebecca J.
    Wang, Ruoniu
    Jones, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2018, 38 (04) : 449 - 462
  • [38] Green building and policy innovation in the US Low-Income Housing Tax Credit programme
    Yeganeh, Armin
    McCoy, Andrew P.
    Reichard, Georg
    Schenk, Todd
    Hankey, Steve
    BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2021, 49 (05): : 543 - 560
  • [39] Are low-income housing tax credit developments locating where there is a shortage of affordable units?
    McClure, Kirk
    HOUSING POLICY DEBATE, 2010, 20 (02) : 153 - 171
  • [40] Weather or Not: Tracking Hurricanes and Changes to Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program Plans
    Shamsuddin, Shomon
    Leib, Ginger
    HOUSING POLICY DEBATE, 2022, 32 (01) : 128 - 151