Fate of coliform bacteria in composted beef cattle feedlot manure

被引:121
|
作者
Larney, FJ [1 ]
Yanke, LJ [1 ]
Miller, JJ [1 ]
McAllister, TA [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Res Ctr, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2003.1508
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The link between livestock production, manure management, and human health has received much public attention in recent years. Composting is often promoted as a means of sanitizing manure to ensure that pathogenic bacteria are not spread to a wider environment during land application. In a two-year study (1998 and 1999) in southern Alberta, we examined the fate of coliform bacteria during windrow composting of cattle (Bos taurus) manure from feedlot pens bedded with cereal straw or wood chips. Numbers of total coliforms (TC) and Escherichia coli declined as the composting period progressed. In 1998, TC levels (mean of both bedding types) were log(10) 7.86 cells g I dry wt. for raw manure on Day 0, log(10) 3.38 cells g(-1) by Day 7, and log(10) 1.69 cells g(-1) by Day 14. More than 99.9% of TC and E. coli was eliminated in the first 7 d when average windrow temperatures ranged from 33.5 to 41.5degreesC. The type of bedding did not influence the numbers of TC or E. coli. Dessication probably played a minor role in coliform elimination, since water loss was low (<0.07 kg kg(-1)) in the first 7 d of composting. However, total aerobic heterotroph populations remained high (>7.0 log(10) CFU g(-1) dry wt., where CFU is colony forming units) throughout the composting period, possibly causing an antagonistic effect. Land application of compost, with its nondetectable levels of E. coli compared with raw manure, should minimize environmental risk in areas of intensive livestock production.
引用
收藏
页码:1508 / 1515
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Coamendments to modify phosphorus extractability and nitrogen phosphorus ratio in feedlot manure and composted manure
    Dao, TH
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1999, 28 (04) : 1114 - 1121
  • [32] Chemical and physical changes following co-composting of beef cattle feedlot manure with phosphogypsum
    Zvomuya, F
    Larney, FJ
    Nichol, CK
    Olson, AF
    Miller, JJ
    DeMaere, PR
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2005, 34 (06) : 2318 - 2327
  • [33] Coliform bacteria as components in biofilm of manure effluents
    Pilip, Larisa V.
    Syrchina, Nadezhda V.
    Ashikhmina, Tamara Ya.
    Kolevatykh, Ekaterina P.
    SOUTH OF RUSSIA-ECOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 18 (03): : 118 - 125
  • [34] ENVIRONMENTAL FATE OF IVERMECTIN IN A CATTLE FEEDLOT
    NESSEL, RJ
    WALLACE, DH
    WEHNER, TA
    TAIT, WE
    GOMEZ, L
    CHEMOSPHERE, 1989, 18 (7-8) : 1531 - 1541
  • [35] Economics of widespread manure application to irrigated crops: Raw and composted feedlot manure in eastern Colorado
    Wang, E.
    Sparling, E.
    American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 1995, 10 (04):
  • [36] Nitrogen dynamics in soil amended with composted cattle manure
    Helgason, Bobbi L.
    Larney, Francis J.
    Janzen, H. Henry
    Olson, Barry M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2007, 87 (01) : 43 - 50
  • [37] SETTING CHARACTERISTICS OF FEEDLOT CATTLE FECES AND MANURE
    LOTT, SC
    LOCH, RJ
    WATTS, PJ
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1994, 37 (01): : 281 - 285
  • [38] Evaluation of essential oils in beef cattle manure slurries and applications of select compounds to beef feedlot surfaces to control zoonotic pathogens
    Wells, J. E.
    Berry, E. D.
    Guerini, M. N.
    Varel, V. H.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 118 (02) : 295 - 304
  • [39] Temporal Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Beef Cattle Feedlot Manure after a Simulated Rainfall Event
    Parker, David B.
    Waldrip, Heidi M.
    Casey, Kenneth D.
    Todd, Richard W.
    Willis, William M.
    Webb, Kathleen
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2017, 46 (04) : 733 - 740
  • [40] Windrow temperatures and chemical properties during active and passive aeration composting of beef cattle feedlot manure
    Larney, Francis J.
    Olson, Andrew F.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2006, 86 (05) : 783 - 797