Forest-owner support for their cooperative's provision of public goods

被引:3
|
作者
Nilsson, Jerker [1 ]
Helgesson, Matilda [1 ]
Rommel, Jens [1 ]
Svensson, Ellinor [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Econ, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Sodra; Sweden; Lobbying; Competitive yardstick model; Property rights; Ownership; AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES; PROSPECT-THEORY; SOCIAL VALUES; GOVERNANCE; MEMBERS; PARTICIPATION; INVOLVEMENT; COMMITMENT; SERVICES; DECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102156
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates why members support their forestry cooperative's provision of awareness-raising campaigns. The members pay for the cooperative's dissemination of information to the government, non-governmental organizations, and the public to achieve a more favorable opinion about forestry. The possible gains of the campaign are non-rivalry goods and apply to members and non-members alike, which makes the campaign a public good. A sample of 782 members of a Swedish forestry cooperative completed a questionnaire based on four theoretically motivated hypotheses. The findings indicate that members are unconcerned about nonmember benefits from campaigns. Members particularly appreciate raising awareness of production-related issues. Social influences among the population of forest owners have no major impact. Trust in the cooperative is essential for member support of the provision of public goods. Members support the cooperative's campaigns even if the outcomes are uncertain or occur in a distant future.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Competition in the Provision of Local Public Goods
    Jayet, Hubert
    [J]. REGION ET DEVELOPPEMENT, 2007, (25): : 211 - 213
  • [42] National Identity and Public Goods Provision
    Ani Harutyunyan
    [J]. Comparative Economic Studies, 2020, 62 : 1 - 33
  • [43] Provision of Public Goods in Czech Agriculture
    Halova, Pavlina
    Kroupova, Zdenka Zakova
    Havlikova, Michaela
    Cechura, Lukas
    Maly, Michal
    [J]. AGRARIAN PERSPECTIVES XXIV: GLOBAL AGRIBUSINESS AND THE RURAL ECONOMY, 2015, : 145 - 158
  • [44] Effect of an audience in public goods provision
    Emel Filiz-Ozbay
    Erkut Y. Ozbay
    [J]. Experimental Economics, 2014, 17 : 200 - 214
  • [45] Efficiency of public goods provision in space
    Warziniack, Travis
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (08) : 1723 - 1730
  • [46] Private provision of public goods and services
    Lal, D
    [J]. PRIVATIZATION AT THE END OF THE CENTURY, 1997, : 329 - 361
  • [47] Modeling public goods provision in agriculture
    Nuppenau, EA
    Badiane, O
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL MARKETS BEYOND LIBERALIZATION, 2000, : 279 - 297
  • [48] Communication and visibility in public goods provision
    Haruvy, Ernan
    Li, Sherry Xin
    McCabe, Kevin
    Twieg, Peter
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2017, 105 : 276 - 296
  • [49] Political equilibrium and the provision of public goods
    Goodman, JC
    Porter, PK
    [J]. PUBLIC CHOICE, 2004, 120 (3-4) : 247 - 266
  • [50] Government, Market and Public goods provision
    Kou, Tiejun
    Zhou, Bo
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT ICPEM 2009, VOL 2: ECONOMIC POLICIES, PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT, 2009, : 187 - 190