From Gene Trees to Species Trees II: Species Tree Inference by Minimizing Deep Coalescence Events

被引:40
|
作者
Zhang, Louxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Math, Singapore 119076, Singapore
关键词
Gene tree and species tree reconciliation; deep coalescence; gene duplication and loss; the parsimony principle; NP-hardness; DUPLICATION; PHYLOGENY; TIME; RECONSTRUCTION; PROBABILITY; DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTION; LINEAGE;
D O I
10.1109/TCBB.2011.83
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
When gene copies are sampled from various species, the resulting gene tree might disagree with the containing species tree. The primary causes of gene tree and species tree discord include incomplete lineage sorting, horizontal gene transfer, and gene duplication and loss. Each of these events yields a different parsimony criterion for inferring the (containing) species tree from gene trees. With incomplete lineage sorting, species tree inference is to find the tree minimizing extra gene lineages that had to coexist along species lineages; with gene duplication, it becomes to find the tree minimizing gene duplications and/or losses. In this paper, we present the following results: 1) The deep coalescence cost is equal to the number of gene losses minus two times the gene duplication cost in the reconciliation of a uniquely leaf labeled gene tree and a species tree. The deep coalescence cost can be computed in linear time for any arbitrary gene tree and species tree. 2) The deep coalescence cost is always not less than the gene duplication cost in the reconciliation of an arbitrary gene tree and a species tree. 3) Species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescence events is NP-hard.
引用
收藏
页码:1685 / 1691
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The probability of topological concordance of gene trees and species trees
    Rosenberg, NA
    [J]. THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 61 (02) : 225 - 247
  • [42] Coalescent histories for discordant gene trees and species trees
    Rosenberg, Noah A.
    Degnan, James H.
    [J]. THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 77 (03) : 145 - 151
  • [43] THE DISTRIBUTIONS UNDER TWO SPECIES-TREE MODELS OF THE NUMBER OF ROOT ANCESTRAL CONFIGURATIONS FOR MATCHING GENE TREES AND SPECIES TREES
    Disanto, Filippo
    Fuchs, Michael
    Paningbatan, Ariel R.
    Rosenberg, Noah A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2022, 32 (06): : 4426 - 4458
  • [44] The distributions under two species-tree models of the total number of ancestral configurations for matching gene trees and species trees
    Disanto, Filippo
    Fuchs, Michael
    Huang, Chun-Yen
    Paningbatan, Ariel R.
    Rosenberg, Noah A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2024, 152
  • [45] Multilocus inference of species trees and DNA barcoding
    Mallo, Diego
    Posada, David
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 371 (1702)
  • [46] Partitioned coalescence support reveals biases in species-tree methods and detects gene trees that determine phylogenomic conflicts
    Gatesy, John
    Sloan, Daniel B.
    Warren, Jessica M.
    Baker, Richard H.
    Simmons, Mark P.
    Springer, Mark S.
    [J]. MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 139
  • [47] iGLASS: An Improvement to the GLASS Method for Estimating Species Trees from Gene Trees
    Jewett, Ethan M.
    Rosenberg, Noah A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (03) : 293 - 315
  • [48] Impact of Deep Coalescence on the Reliability of Species Tree Inference from Different Types of DNA Markers in Mammals
    Sanchez-Gracia, Alejandro
    Castresana, Jose
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (01):
  • [49] Identifying the rooted species tree from the distribution of unrooted gene trees under the coalescent
    Elizabeth S. Allman
    James H. Degnan
    John A. Rhodes
    [J]. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 2011, 62 : 833 - 862
  • [50] Identifying the rooted species tree from the distribution of unrooted gene trees under the coalescent
    Allman, Elizabeth S.
    Degnan, James H.
    Rhodes, John A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 62 (06) : 833 - 862