Meeting patients' education and decision-making needs for first trimester prenatal aneuploidy screening

被引:17
|
作者
Farrell, Ruth M. [1 ,2 ]
Nutter, Benjamin [3 ]
Agatisa, Patricia K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Bioeth, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
first trimester aneuploidy screening; decision-making; informed consent; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; DOWN-SYNDROME; PREGNANT-WOMEN; NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY; FETAL ABNORMALITIES; 1ST-TRIMESTER; RISK; 2ND-TRIMESTER;
D O I
10.1002/pd.2867
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective First trimester aneuploidy screening introduces unique challenges to patient education and informed decision-making. Our study assessed the decision-making process among those pregnant patients presenting for this new form of aneuploidy screening. Method A survey instrument was used to assess components of decision-making among women who presented for first trimester aneuploidy screening. Knowledge and leading factors in the decision-making process were measured. Results Participants (n = 139) demonstrated understanding of the etiology of Down syndrome, but less understanding of its cognitive (65.2%) and physical manifestations (58.7%). Few were able to determine risk from first trimester screen results (36.7%). Participants were more familiar with amniocentesis (84.2%) than chorionic villus sampling (73.4%), though less familiar with procedural risks (29.5% and 28.1%, respectively). The majority of participants ranked the following as key information in their decision: knowledge of their intentions about the outcome of the pregnancy based on the test results (92.4%), knowledge of chorionic villus sampling to evaluate an abnormal result (92.0%), and values and beliefs about termination (89.1%). Conclusion First trimester aneuploidy screening generates education and decision-making benchmarks for patients and providers. It is important to address these barriers as this new screen becomes a growing part of current prenatal genetic testing offerings. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1222 / 1228
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and pilot study of the prenatal informed decision-making (PRENID)-scale: a measure for informed decision-making in first trimester prenatal screening
    Bakkeren, I. M.
    Polak, M. G.
    Kisters, F. K. C.
    Galjaard, R. H.
    Tibben, A.
    Riedijk, S. R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 708 - 709
  • [2] Risk and uncertainty: Shifting decision making for aneuploidy screening to the first trimester of pregnancy
    Farrell, Ruth M.
    Dolgin, Natasha
    Flocke, Susan A.
    Winbush, Victoria
    Mercer, Mary Beth
    Simon, Christian
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (05) : 429 - 436
  • [3] First trimester screening versus diagnostic testing; how important is prenatal counseling in the decision-making process?
    Wong, Amy
    Blumenfeld, Yair
    Lyell, Deirdre
    Ormond, Kelly
    Chueh, Jane
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S253 - S253
  • [4] Informed Decision Making Regarding Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening
    Shea, Tamra L.
    [J]. JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2020, 49 (01): : 41 - 54
  • [5] Aneuploidy screening in the first trimester
    Spencer, Kevin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS, 2007, 145C (01) : 18 - 32
  • [6] EDUCATION NEEDS RATIONAL DECISION-MAKING
    NOAH, HJ
    [J]. TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 1970, 72 (02): : 187 - 200
  • [7] Women's decision-making in prenatal screening
    Santalahti, P
    Hemminki, E
    Latikka, AM
    Ryynanen, MU
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1998, 46 (08) : 1067 - 1076
  • [8] Representing and intervening: 'doing' good care in first trimester prenatal knowledge production and decision-making
    Schwennesen, Nete
    Koch, Lene
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2012, 34 (02) : 283 - 298
  • [9] Decision-making for prenatal genetic screening: how will pregnant women navigate a growing number of aneuploidy and carrier screening options?
    Ruth M. Farrell
    Madelyn Pierce
    Christina Collart
    Meng Yao
    Marissa Coleridge
    Edward K. Chien
    Susannah S. Rose
    Mary Lintel
    Uma Perni
    Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [10] Decision-making for prenatal genetic screening: how will pregnant women navigate a growing number of aneuploidy and carrier screening options?
    Farrell, Ruth M.
    Pierce, Madelyn
    Collart, Christina
    Yao, Meng
    Coleridge, Marissa
    Chien, Edward K.
    Rose, Susannah S.
    Lintel, Mary
    Perni, Uma
    Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)