Decision-making for prenatal genetic screening: how will pregnant women navigate a growing number of aneuploidy and carrier screening options?

被引:5
|
作者
Farrell, Ruth M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pierce, Madelyn [1 ]
Collart, Christina [1 ]
Yao, Meng [4 ]
Coleridge, Marissa [1 ,2 ]
Chien, Edward K. [1 ]
Rose, Susannah S. [5 ]
Lintel, Mary [1 ]
Perni, Uma [1 ]
Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker [6 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, OB GYN & Womens Hlth Inst, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Genom Med Inst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Ctr Bioeth, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Quantitat Hlth Sci Dept, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Cleveland Clin, Clin Transformat, Off Patient Experience, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[6] Indiana Univ, Dept OB GYN, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
Prenatal aneuploidy screening; Prenatal carrier screening; Decision-making; Patient education; Genomics; PRECONCEPTION CARE; POSITION STATEMENT; MEDICAL-GENETICS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; INFORMED-CONSENT; OBSTETRIC CARE; UNITED-STATES; BARRIERS; KNOWLEDGE; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-021-04282-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Prenatal genetic screens, including carrier screening (CS) and aneuploidy screening (AS), comprise an important component of reproductive healthcare delivery. Clinical practice guidelines emphasize the importance of informed decision-making and patient's preferences regarding the use of these screens. Yet, it is unclear how to achieve this ideal as prenatal genetic screening options rapidly become more complex and increasingly available to patients. With increased complexity and availability of reproductive testing options, decision-support strategies are critical to prepare patients to consider AS and/or CS. Methods A self-administered survey evaluated knowledge and decision-making preferences for expanded carrier (CS) and aneuploidy (AS) prenatal screening. The survey was administered to participants before their first prenatal visit to assess baseline decision-making needs and preference at the initiation of prenatal care. Analysis was approached as a descriptive process. Results Participants had similar familiarity with the concepts associated with AS compared to CS; mean knowledge scores for CS was 0.59 [possible range 0.00 to 1.00] and 0.55 for AS. Participants reported preferences to learn about a range of conditions, including those with severe or mild impact, childhood-onset, and adult-onset. Decision-making preference with respect to learning about the associated disease phenotypes for the contained on AS and CS panel shifted with the complexity of the panel, with a greater preference to learn about conditions post-test compared pre-test education as panels increased from 5 to 100 conditions. Conclusion Patients' baseline knowledge of prenatal genetic screens coupled with evolving decision-making preferences presents challenges for the delivery of prenatal genetic screens. This calls for the development and implementation of innovative approaches to support pregnant patients' decision-making commensurate with advances in prenatal genomics.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision-making for prenatal genetic screening: how will pregnant women navigate a growing number of aneuploidy and carrier screening options?
    Ruth M. Farrell
    Madelyn Pierce
    Christina Collart
    Meng Yao
    Marissa Coleridge
    Edward K. Chien
    Susannah S. Rose
    Mary Lintel
    Uma Perni
    Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [2] Decision-making process of prenatal screening described by pregnant women and their partners
    Watterbjork, Inger
    Blomberg, Karin
    Nilsson, Kerstin
    Sahlberg-Blom, Eva
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (05) : 1582 - 1592
  • [3] Women's decision-making in prenatal screening
    Santalahti, P
    Hemminki, E
    Latikka, AM
    Ryynanen, MU
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1998, 46 (08) : 1067 - 1076
  • [4] Quantitative decision-making in preimplantation genetic (aneuploidy) screening (PGS)
    Michael C. Summers
    Andrew D. Foland
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2009, 26 : 487 - 502
  • [5] Quantitative decision-making in preimplantation genetic (aneuploidy) screening (PGS)
    Summers, Michael C.
    Foland, Andrew D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2009, 26 (9-10) : 487 - 502
  • [6] Informed Decision Making Regarding Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening
    Shea, Tamra L.
    [J]. JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2020, 49 (01): : 41 - 54
  • [7] Understanding pregnant women's decision making concerning prenatal screening
    van den Berg, Matthijs
    Timmermans, Danielle R. M.
    Knol, Dirk L.
    de Smit, Denhard J.
    van Eijk, Jacques Th. M.
    van Vugt, John M. G.
    van der Wal, Gerrit
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 27 (04) : 430 - 437
  • [8] Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: women's involvement in decision-making and their attitudes to screening
    Seror, Valerie
    Ville, Yves
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2009, 29 (02) : 120 - 128
  • [9] Meeting patients' education and decision-making needs for first trimester prenatal aneuploidy screening
    Farrell, Ruth M.
    Nutter, Benjamin
    Agatisa, Patricia K.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2011, 31 (13) : 1222 - 1228
  • [10] Preparation for prenatal decision-making: a baseline of knowledge and reflection in women participating in prenatal screening
    McCoyd, Judith L. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 34 (01) : 3 - 8