The use of collagen porcine dermal matrix and connective tissue graft with modified coronally advanced tunnel technique in the treatment of multiple adjacent type I gingival recessions: A randomized, controlled clinical trial

被引:14
|
作者
Rakasevic, Dragana L. [1 ]
Milinkovic, Iva Z. [1 ]
Jankovic, Sasa M. [1 ]
Soldatovic, Ivan A. [2 ]
Aleksic, Zoran M. [1 ]
Nikolic-Jakoba, Natasa S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodontol, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Univ Belgrade, Inst Biostat, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
collagen matrix; connective tissue graft; esthetics; modified coronally advanced tunnel technique; multiple gingival recessions; periodontal plastic surgery; MILLER CLASS-I; ROOT-COVERAGE PROCEDURES; RICH FIBRIN MEMBRANE; ADVANCED FLAP; DEFECTS; COMBINATION; ALLOGRAFT; SURGERY; MAXILLA;
D O I
10.1111/jerd.12624
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the clinical efficacy and esthetic outcome of porcine-derived dermal collagen matrix in comparison with connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions (MAGR), 6 and 12 months after the surgery. Materials and methods Twenty patients with bilateral type I MAGR were treated randomly with porcine-derived dermal collagen matrix (test site) or connective tissue graft (control site) in combination with a modified coronally advanced tunnel technique. The primary objectives were to evaluate the mean and complete root coverage. The secondary objectives were to assess keratinized tissue width, gingival thickness gain, and root coverage esthetic score. Results Six and 12 months postoperatively, both groups achieved significant improvements in all clinical parameters compared to baseline, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. Mean root coverage change (Delta 12m - 6 m) was statistically significant between the groups in favor of connective tissue graft, and twice as many patients exhibited a complete coverage of all recessions in the control group than the test group. Conclusion The porcine-derived dermal collagen matrix combined with a modified coronally advanced tunnel technique resulted in satisfactory clinical and esthetic outcomes, which were similar to connective tissue graft. Clinical significance Porcine-derived dermal collagen matrix (XDM) may be proposed as a substitute for connective tissue graft in multiple adjacent recession treatment due to successful root coverage, a significant increase of gingival thickness, and high esthetic outcomes. The clinical benefits for the use of XDM could be: (a) second surgical wound avoidance, (b) patient discomfort decrease, and (c) lower complications' rate.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 690
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tunnel technique with enamel matrix derivative in addition to subepithelial connective tissue graft compared with connective tissue graft alone for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial
    Gorski, Bartlomiej
    Gorska, Renata
    Wysokinska-Miszczuk, Joanna
    Kaczynski, Tomasz
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (12) : 4475 - 4486
  • [32] Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with the tunnel subepithelial connective tissue graft: A clinical report
    Zabalegui, I
    Sicilia, A
    Cambra, J
    Gil, J
    Sanz, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 1999, 19 (02) : 199 - 206
  • [33] Clinical evaluation of the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with connective tissue graft or concentrated growth factor using tunnel technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Korkmaz, Birsen
    Balli, Umut
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (11) : 6347 - 6356
  • [34] Clinical evaluation of the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with connective tissue graft or concentrated growth factor using tunnel technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Birsen Korkmaz
    Umut Balli
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 6347 - 6356
  • [35] Acellular dermal matrix and coronally advanced flap or tunnel technique in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions. A 12-year follow-up from a randomized clinical trial
    Tavelli, Lorenzo
    Barootchi, Shayan
    Di Gianfilippo, Riccardo
    Modarressi, Marmar
    Cairo, Francesco
    Rasperini, Giulio
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 46 (09) : 937 - 948
  • [36] Efficiency of platelet-rich plasma on acellular dermal matrix application with coronally advanced flap in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Cetiner, Deniz
    Kalabay, Pelin Gokalp
    Ozdemir, Burcu
    Cankaya, Zeynep Turgut
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2018, 13 (03) : 198 - 206
  • [37] Treatment of multiple adjacent maxillary Miller Class I, II, and III gingival recessions with the modified coronally advanced tunnel, enamel matrix derivative, and subepithelial connective tissue graft: A report of 12 cases
    Sculean, Anton
    Cosgarea, Raluca
    Stahli, Alexandra
    Katsaros, Christos
    Arweiler, Nicole Birgit
    Miron, Richard John
    Deppe, Herbert
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 47 (08): : 653 - 659
  • [38] Treatment of adjacent gingival recessions with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and the modified tunnel technique
    Tözüm, TF
    Dini, FM
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 34 (01): : 7 - 13
  • [39] Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a comparative short- and long-term controlled randomized clinical trial
    Zucchelli, Giovanni
    Mounssif, Ilham
    Mazzotti, Claudio
    Stefanini, Martina
    Marzadori, Matteo
    Petracci, Elisabetta
    Montebugnoli, Lucio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2014, 41 (04) : 396 - 403
  • [40] Split-Mouth Comparison of Coronally Advanced Flap with Connective Tissue Graft or Collagen Matrix for Treatment of Isolated Gingival Recessions
    Matoh, Urban
    Petelin, Milan
    Gaspersic, Rok
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 39 (03) : 439 - 446