Uncertainty Quantification of a Multiscale Model for In-Stent Restenosis

被引:17
|
作者
Nikishova, Anna [1 ]
Veen, Lourens [2 ]
Zun, Pavel [1 ,3 ]
Hoekstra, Alfons G. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Sci, Inst Informat, Sci Computat Lab, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands eSci Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] ITMO Univ, St Petersburg, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
In-Stent Restenosis model; Multiscale simulation; Uncertainty quantification; Sensitivity analysis; QUASI-RANDOM SEQUENCES; CORONARY;
D O I
10.1007/s13239-018-00372-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose-Coronary artery stenosis, or abnormal narrowing, is a widespread and potentially fatal cardiac disease. After treatment by balloon angioplasty and stenting, restenosis may occur inside the stent due to excessive neointima formation. Simulations of in-stent restenosis can provide new insight into this process. However, uncertainties due to variability in patient-specific parameters must be taken into account. Methods-We performed an uncertainty quantification (UQ) study on a complex two-dimensional in-stent restenosis model. We used a quasi-Monte Carlo method for UQ of the neointimal area, and the Sobol sensitivity analysis (SA) to estimate the proportions of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties and to determine the most important input parameters. Results-We observe approximately 30% uncertainty in the mean neointimal area as simulated by the model. Depending on whether a fast initial endothelium recovery occurs, the proportion of the model variance due to natural variability ranges from 15 to 35%. The endothelium regeneration time is identified as the most influential model parameter. Conclusion-The model output contains a moderate quantity of uncertainty, and the model precision can be increased by obtaining a more certain value on the endothelium regeneration time. We conclude that the quasi-Monte Carlo UQ and the Sobol SA are reliable methods for estimating uncertainties in the response of complicated multiscale cardiovascular models.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 774
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Update on management of in-stent restenosis
    Hermiller, JB
    Fry, ETA
    Peters, TF
    Orr, CM
    Van Tassel, J
    Waller, BF
    Pinkerton, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 11 (05) : S51 - S56
  • [42] Intracoronary radiation for in-stent restenosis
    Malenkianpoor M.
    [J]. Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2000, 2 (1): : 130
  • [43] In-Stent Restenosis: Burn and Rebuild?
    De Gregorio, Joseph
    Aoki, Yasuhiro
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2021, 22 : 50 - 51
  • [44] How to manage in-stent restenosis
    Nobuyoshi, M
    Yokoi, H
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2000, 49 (01) : 30 - 31
  • [45] Viabahn for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis
    Al Shammeri, Owayed
    Bitar, Fahad
    Ghitelman, Jaime
    Soukas, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 56 (13) : B96 - B96
  • [46] Folate therapy and in-stent restenosis
    Stanger, O
    Fowler, B
    Herrmann, W
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (12): : 1259 - 1259
  • [47] Current Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Byrne, Robert A.
    Rivero, Fernando
    Kastrati, Adnan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (24) : 2659 - 2673
  • [48] Regression of coronary in-stent restenosis
    Nageh, T
    Duncan, E
    Thomas, MR
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2004, 62 (02) : 201 - 202
  • [49] Carotid Brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis
    Chan, AW
    Roffi, M
    Mukherjee, D
    Bajzer, CT
    Abou-Chebl, A
    Ciezki, J
    Bhatt, DL
    Ghaffari, S
    Yadav, JS
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2003, 58 (01) : 86 - 92
  • [50] Treatment strategies for in-stent restenosis
    Storger, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 11 (06) : 571 - 575