In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty

被引:25
|
作者
Glaser, Diana [1 ]
Dennis, Douglas A. [1 ,2 ]
Komistek, Richard D. [1 ]
Miner, Todd M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Biomed Engn, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Colorado Joint Replacement, Denver, CO 80210 USA
关键词
MIS; THA; kinematics; kinetics; separation; in vivo; anterolateral THA; posterolateral THA; forces; fluoroscopy; gait; hip; mathematical modeling; Kane's dynamics;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.09.015
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background. Minimally invasive surgery has been developed to reduce incision length, muscle damage, and rehabilitation time. However, reduced exposure of anatomical landmarks may result in technical errors and interior implant survivorship. The objective of this study was to compare in vivo motions and hip joint contact forces during gait in total hip arthroplasty subjects, performed with either minimally invasive surgery or standard surgical approaches. Methods. Fifteen subjects implanted using either minimally invasive surgery anterolateral, minimally invasive surgery posterolateral, or traditional posterolateral total hip arthroplasty were evaluated using fluoroscopy while performing gait on a treadmill. Kinematics, obtained using 3D-to-2D image registration technique, were input as temporal functions in a 3D inverse dynamic mathematical model that determines in vivo soft tissue and hip contact forces. Findings. The subjects implanted with posterolateral and anterolateral minimally invasive surgery demonstrated significantly less separation than those implanted with the traditional approach (P < 0.01). The minimally invasive surgery subjects also experienced lower average maximum peak forces, with 3.2 body weight for the anterolateral minimally invasive surgery and 2.9 body weight for the posterolateral minimally invasive: surgery subjects, compared to 3.5 body weight for the traditional subjects (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively) Interpretation. This is the first study to compare in vivo weight-bearing kinematics, separation and kinetics for traditional, anterolateral minimally invasive surgery and posterolateral minimally invasive surgery total hip arthroplasty subject groups. Our data indicated in all analyzed parameters differences between the minimally invasive surgery and the traditional groups, with favorable results for the minimally invasive surgery subjects. This may be related, to a reduction in stabilizing soft tissues after a minimally invasive surgery procedure, leading to lower bearing surface forces at the femoral head-acetabular cup interface. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 134
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gait analysis after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty
    Sander, K.
    Layher, F.
    Anders, C.
    Roth, A.
    Babisch, J.
    Scholle, H. -C.
    Kinne, R. W.
    [J]. ORTHOPADE, 2012, 41 (05): : 365 - +
  • [42] The impact of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty on the standard procedure
    Szendroi, Miklos
    Sztrinkai, Gergely
    Vass, Roland
    Kiss, Janos
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2006, 30 (03) : 167 - 171
  • [43] Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty
    Berger, RA
    Jacobs, JJ
    Meneghini, RM
    Della Valle, C
    Paprosky, W
    Rosenberg, AG
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (429) : 239 - 247
  • [44] Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty - A prospective randomized study
    Chimento, GF
    Pavone, V
    Sharrock, N
    Kahn, B
    Cahill, J
    Sculco, TP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (02): : 139 - 144
  • [45] Component position in 2-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty compared to standard total hip arthroplasty
    Williams, Susan Lai
    Bachison, Casey
    Michelson, James D.
    Manner, Paul A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (02): : 197 - 202
  • [46] Minimally Invasive Hip Arthroplasty Introduction
    Berger, Richard A.
    [J]. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2006, 16 (02) : 83 - 83
  • [47] Comparison of Minimally Invasive Direct Anterior Versus Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Inflammation and Muscle Damage Markers
    Bergin, Patrick F.
    Doppelts, Jason D.
    Kephart, Curtis J.
    Benke, Michael T.
    Graeter, James H.
    Holmes, Andrew S.
    Haleem-Smith, Hana
    Tuan, Rocky S.
    Unger, Anthony S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (15): : 1392 - 1398
  • [48] Recovery after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a gait study
    Wimmer, M. A.
    Hildebrand, M.
    Moisio, K. C.
    Foucher, K. C.
    Della Valle, C. J.
    Berger, R. A.
    Galante, J. O.
    [J]. MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2012, 63 (02): : 101 - 110
  • [49] Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach
    Rachbauer, F
    [J]. ORTHOPADE, 2005, 34 (11): : 1103 - +
  • [50] Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach
    Rachbauer, Franz
    Krismer, Martin
    [J]. OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2008, 20 (03): : 239 - 251