Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials show suboptimal validity of surrogate outcomes for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer

被引:55
|
作者
Ciani, Oriana [1 ,2 ]
Buyse, Marc [3 ,4 ]
Garside, Ruth [5 ]
Peters, Jaime [1 ]
Saad, Everardo D. [6 ]
Stein, Ken [1 ]
Taylor, Rod S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Inst Hlth Res, Exeter EX2 4SG, Devon, England
[2] Bocconi Univ, Ctr Res Hlth & Social Care Management, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[3] Hasselt Univ, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat I BioSt, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
[4] IDDI, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Knowledge Spa,Royal Cornwall Hosp, Truro TR1 3HD, England
[6] Dendrix Res, BR-04534000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Surrogate outcome; Colorectal cancer; PFS; TTP; Tumor response; Health technology assessment; PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL; CELL LUNG-CANCER; END-POINTS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; TUMOR RESPONSE; STATISTICAL-METHODS; EVALUATION SCHEMA; TIME; VALIDATION; BIOMARKERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.016
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To quantify and compare the treatment effects on three surrogate end points, progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and tumor response rate (TR) vs. overall survival (OS) based on a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of drug interventions in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). Study Design and Setting: We systematically searched for RCTs of pharmacologic therapies in aCRC between 2003 and 2013. Trial characteristics, risk of bias, and outcomes were recorded based on a predefined form. Univariate and multivariate random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled summary treatment effects. The ratio of hazard ratios (HRs)/odds ratios (ORs) and difference in medians were used to quantify the degree of difference in treatment effects on the surrogate end points and OS. Spearman rho, surrogate threshold effect (STE), and R-2 were also estimated across predefined trial-level covariates. Results: We included 101 RCTs. In univariate and multivariate meta-analyses, we found larger treatment effects for the surrogates than for OS. Compared with OS, treatment effects were on average 13% higher when HRs were measured and 3% to 45% higher when ORs were considered; differences in median PFS/TTP were higher than on OS by an average of 0.5 month. Spearman rho ranged from 0.39 to 0.80, mean R-2 from 0.06 to 0.65, and STE was 0.8 for HRPFS, 0.64 for HRTTP or 0.28 for ORTR. The stratified analyses revealed high variability across all strata. Conclusion: None of the end points in this study were found to achieve the level of evidence (ie, mean R-trial(2) > 0.60) that has been set to select high or excellent correlation levels by common surrogate evaluation tools. Previous surrogacy relationships observed between PFS and TTP vs. OS in selected settings may not apply across other classes or lines of therapy. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 842
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SURROGATE ENDPOINTS FOR OVERALL SURVIVAL (OS) IN ADVANCED MELANOMA: A TARGETED LITERATURE REVIEW (TLR) OF CORRELATION META-ANALYSES
    Pourrahmat, M. M.
    Leung, L.
    Kurt, M.
    Chou, E.
    Kanters, S.
    Moshyk, A.
    Hamilton, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S37 - S37
  • [22] Disease-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in adjuvant trials of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of 20 randomized controlled trials
    Run-Cong Nie
    Xue-Bin Zou
    Shu-Qiang Yuan
    Ying-Bo Chen
    Shi Chen
    Yong-Ming Chen
    Guo-Ming Chen
    Xiao-Jiang Chen
    Tian-Qi Luo
    Shu-Man Li
    Jin-Ling Duan
    Yun Wang
    Yuan-Fang Li
    BMC Cancer, 20
  • [23] Disease-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in adjuvant trials of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of 20 randomized controlled trials
    Nie, Run-Cong
    Zou, Xue-Bin
    Yuan, Shu-Qiang
    Chen, Ying-Bo
    Chen, Shi
    Chen, Yong-Ming
    Chen, Guo-Ming
    Chen, Xiao-Jiang
    Luo, Tian-Qi
    Li, Shu-Man
    Duan, Jin-Ling
    Wang, Yun
    Li, Yuan-Fang
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [24] NIDCAP: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ohlsson, Arne
    Jacobs, Susan E.
    PEDIATRICS, 2013, 131 (03) : E881 - E893
  • [25] Meta-analyses on progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in triple-negative breast cancer
    Takehiro Hirai
    Asuka Nemoto
    Yoshinori Ito
    Masaaki Matsuura
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2020, 181 : 189 - 198
  • [26] Meta-analyses on progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in triple-negative breast cancer
    Hirai, Takehiro
    Nemoto, Asuka
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Matsuura, Masaaki
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 181 (01) : 189 - 198
  • [27] Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials, Meta-analyses, and Subgroup Analyses Reply
    Hennekens, Charles H.
    DeMets, David
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (13): : 1254 - 1255
  • [28] The effects of Quercetin supplementation on cardiometabolic outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
    Arabi, Seyyed Mostafa
    Shahraki-Jazini, Mostafa
    Chambari, Mahla
    Bahrami, Leila Sadat
    Maleki, Mohsen
    Sukhorukov, Vasily N.
    Sahebkar, Amirhossein
    PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2023, 37 (11) : 5080 - 5091
  • [29] Duration of adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2 positive breast cancer: Overall and disease free survival results from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
    Gyawali, Bishal
    Niraula, Saroj
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2017, 60 : 18 - 23
  • [30] Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Li, Yapeng
    Zhang, Tingting
    Sun, Jiahui
    Liu, Nanyang
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 12