Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials show suboptimal validity of surrogate outcomes for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer

被引:55
|
作者
Ciani, Oriana [1 ,2 ]
Buyse, Marc [3 ,4 ]
Garside, Ruth [5 ]
Peters, Jaime [1 ]
Saad, Everardo D. [6 ]
Stein, Ken [1 ]
Taylor, Rod S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Inst Hlth Res, Exeter EX2 4SG, Devon, England
[2] Bocconi Univ, Ctr Res Hlth & Social Care Management, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[3] Hasselt Univ, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat I BioSt, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
[4] IDDI, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Knowledge Spa,Royal Cornwall Hosp, Truro TR1 3HD, England
[6] Dendrix Res, BR-04534000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Surrogate outcome; Colorectal cancer; PFS; TTP; Tumor response; Health technology assessment; PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL; CELL LUNG-CANCER; END-POINTS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; TUMOR RESPONSE; STATISTICAL-METHODS; EVALUATION SCHEMA; TIME; VALIDATION; BIOMARKERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.016
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To quantify and compare the treatment effects on three surrogate end points, progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and tumor response rate (TR) vs. overall survival (OS) based on a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of drug interventions in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). Study Design and Setting: We systematically searched for RCTs of pharmacologic therapies in aCRC between 2003 and 2013. Trial characteristics, risk of bias, and outcomes were recorded based on a predefined form. Univariate and multivariate random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled summary treatment effects. The ratio of hazard ratios (HRs)/odds ratios (ORs) and difference in medians were used to quantify the degree of difference in treatment effects on the surrogate end points and OS. Spearman rho, surrogate threshold effect (STE), and R-2 were also estimated across predefined trial-level covariates. Results: We included 101 RCTs. In univariate and multivariate meta-analyses, we found larger treatment effects for the surrogates than for OS. Compared with OS, treatment effects were on average 13% higher when HRs were measured and 3% to 45% higher when ORs were considered; differences in median PFS/TTP were higher than on OS by an average of 0.5 month. Spearman rho ranged from 0.39 to 0.80, mean R-2 from 0.06 to 0.65, and STE was 0.8 for HRPFS, 0.64 for HRTTP or 0.28 for ORTR. The stratified analyses revealed high variability across all strata. Conclusion: None of the end points in this study were found to achieve the level of evidence (ie, mean R-trial(2) > 0.60) that has been set to select high or excellent correlation levels by common surrogate evaluation tools. Previous surrogacy relationships observed between PFS and TTP vs. OS in selected settings may not apply across other classes or lines of therapy. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 842
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of surrogate end points for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer: further need for clarification: Letter to the editor on: Ciani et al., 2015, Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials show suboptimal validity of surrogate outcomes for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer. 2015, J Clin Epidemiol 68:833-842
    Schuermann, Christoph
    Wieseler, Beate
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 70 : 278 - 279
  • [2] Meta-analyses evaluating surrogate endpoints for overall survival in cancer randomized trials: A critical review
    Savina, Marion
    Gourgou, Sophie
    Italiano, Antoine
    Dinart, Derek
    Rondeau, Virginie
    Penel, Nicolas
    Mathoulin-Pelissier, Simone
    Bellera, Carine
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2018, 123 : 21 - 41
  • [3] META-ANALYSES OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    SACKS, HS
    BERRIER, J
    REITMAN, D
    ANCONABERK, VA
    CHALMERS, TC
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 316 (08): : 450 - 455
  • [4] Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in locally advanced head and neck cancer: meta-analyses of individual patient data
    Michiels, Stefan
    Le Maitre, Aurelie
    Buyse, Marc
    Burzykowski, Tomasz
    Maillard, Emilie
    Bogaerts, Jan
    Vermorken, Jan B.
    Budach, Wilfried
    Pajak, Thomas F.
    Ang, Kian K.
    Bourhis, Jean
    Pignon, Jean-Pierre
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2009, 10 (04): : 341 - 350
  • [5] Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials
    Imperiale, TF
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (01): : 61 - 61
  • [6] Randomized controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses
    Pfeifer, Michael
    ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2015, 10 (01)
  • [7] Randomized controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses
    Michael Pfeifer
    Archives of Osteoporosis, 2015, 10
  • [8] META-ANALYSIS OF THE VALIDITY OF PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL AS A SURROGATE ENDPOINT FOR OVERALL SURVIVAL IN METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER TRIALS
    Chirila, C.
    Odom, D. M.
    Devercelli, G.
    Khan, S.
    Sherif, B. N.
    Kaye, J. A.
    Molnar, I.
    Sherrill, B. H.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 : 202 - 202
  • [9] PLOTTING SURROGATE OUTCOMES Arrow plots show results of meta-analyses of surrogate and clinical outcomes
    Badgett, Robert
    Dong, Fanglong
    Aung, Koko
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
  • [10] Review of meta-analyses evaluating surrogate endpoints for overall survival in oncology
    Sherrill, Beth
    Kaye, James A.
    Sandin, Rickard
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    Chen, Connie
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2012, 5 : 287 - 296