Social Trust Formation and Credit Accessibility-Evidence from Rural Households in China

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Tong [1 ]
Liu, Huiting [2 ]
Liang, Pinghan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] South China Agr Univ, Natl Sch Agr Inst & Dev, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
[2] South China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Ctr Chinese Publ Adm Res, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Govt, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
social capital; trust; credit accessibility; gift giving; informal lending; community trust; personal trust; network formation; risk sharing; RISK-SHARING NETWORKS; INSURANCE; RECIPROCITY; PREFERENCES; COMMITMENT; ACCESS;
D O I
10.3390/su12020667
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Trust as a form of social capital plays an important role in improving the cooperation between agents, especially in credit lending activities. Trust building has attracted significant research interest, and gift giving has been shown to be one of its main drivers. Nonetheless, the mechanism of gift giving in the formation of trust networks and the channels through which gift giving and trust affect cooperation require further investigation. In this paper, we first separate social trust into community trust and personal trust, and we examine how gift giving affects the formation of each level of trust. We then explore how trust and gift giving affect rural households' access to formal and informal sources of credit. Our results show that gift giving mainly helps in forming trust at the personal level rather than the community level. In turn, personal and community trust can facilitate access to informal and formal sources of credit, respectively. In addition, personal trust facilitates access to informal loans for consumption and medical expenses but not production. Overall, our findings show that gift giving is mainly used to build personal trust which facilitates access to informal lending for risk-sharing purposes.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Scale of cities and social trust: Evidence from China
    Deng, Xin
    Yu, Mingzhe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 76 : 215 - 228
  • [32] Social trust and firm innovation: Evidence from China
    Ding, Xiaoya
    Guo, Mengmeng
    Kuai, Yicheng
    Niu, Geng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 84 : 474 - 493
  • [33] Return Intention, Subjective Social Status and Residential Choices of Rural Migrant Worker Households: Evidence from China
    Zou, Jing
    Deng, Xiaojun
    [J]. HOUSING THEORY & SOCIETY, 2020, 37 (04): : 417 - 438
  • [34] Determinants of indebtedness and institutional credit to rural agricultural households: an empirical evidence from South India
    Manogna, R. L.
    Mishra, Aswini Kumar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 49 (09) : 1387 - 1400
  • [35] Socioeconomic Inequalities in Green Space Quality and Accessibility-Evidence from a Southern European City
    Hoffimann, Elaine
    Barros, Henrique
    Ribeiro, Ana Isabel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 14 (08)
  • [36] Power of Agricultural Credit in Farmland Abandonment: Evidence from Rural China
    Du, Jiang
    Zeng, Miao
    Xie, Zhengjuan
    Wang, Shikun
    [J]. LAND, 2019, 8 (12)
  • [37] Competition under credit rationing: theory and evidence from rural China
    Park, A
    Brandt, L
    Giles, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2003, 71 (02) : 463 - 495
  • [38] Access to Credit and Economic Well-Being of Rural Households: Evidence from Eastern India
    Kumar, Anjani
    Mishra, Ashok K.
    Sonkar, Vinay K.
    Saroj, Sunil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2020, 45 (01) : 145 - 160
  • [39] Farmers' personality traits and credit exclusion: Evidence from rural China
    Tian, Yaqun
    Fan, Yachen
    He, Guangwen
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [40] The gamification of trust: the case of China's "social credit"
    Ramadan, Zahy
    [J]. MARKETING INTELLIGENCE & PLANNING, 2018, 36 (01) : 93 - 107