Malignant spiculated breast masses: Dynamic contrast enhanced MR (DCE-MR) imaging enhancement characteristics and histopathological correlation

被引:11
|
作者
Gokalp, Gokhan [1 ]
Topal, Ugur [1 ]
Yildirim, Nalan [1 ]
Tolunay, Sahsine [2 ]
机构
[1] Uludag Univ, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, TR-16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
[2] Uludag Univ, Dept Pathol, Fac Med, TR-16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
关键词
Spiculated; Breast; MR imaging; PATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION; CANCER; FEATURES; LESIONS; CARCINOMA; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.022
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Aim: Spiculation of breast masses is usually the result of significant desmoplastic reaction. Diminished neovascularization is expected due to sparsely dispersed tumor cells within the lesion. This feature can cause differences in enhancement patterns which can cause pitfalls while evaluating MR images as well. Aim of this study is to explore the enhancement characteristics of malignant spiculated masses and to correlate these findings with histopathological features. Materials and methods: Eighteen spiculated and seventeen non-spiculated masses depicted with mammography were included in the study. MR imaging was performed with 1.5 T magnet with breast coil. In MR imaging, T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) with fat suppression sequence followed by pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted 3D-fast low angle shot (FLASH) sequences were used. Lesions were evaluated according to enhancement characteristics: early phase enhancement (first 2 min; less than 50%, 50-100% and more than 100%), late phase enhancement (2-6 min; persistent, plateau and washout) and inner enhancement pattern (homogenous, heterogenous and rim). Desmoplasia and lymphocyte infiltration was classified as mild, moderate and severe. MR images and histopathological findings (desmoplasia, lymphocyte infiltration and grade) of both groups were compared. Results: Mean ages of patients in spiculated and non-spiculated-mass groups were 55.07 (41-71) and 47.35 (31-62), respectively. Mean diameter of lesions was 17.3 mm (10-31 mm) for spiculated masses while non spiculated masses were 15.8 mm (6-40 mm). There were statistically significant differences between late phase enhancement, persistent enhancement, plateau and washout (p < 0.05). Intergroup comparison of desmoplasia revealed significant difference between severe versus and mild, moderate (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Spiculated malignant lesions are supposed to contain intense desmoplastic reaction. On DCE-MR images they can show persistent enhancement pattern more often than non-spiculated lesions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 208
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MAGNETIZATION TRANSFER CONTRAST MR IMAGING OF BENIGN AND MALIGNANT LUNG MASSES
    PARANJPE, DV
    LI, KC
    BERGIN, CJ
    PIKE, B
    GLOVER, GH
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 : 119 - 119
  • [32] Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in correlation with diffusion weighted (DWI) MR for characterization of ovarian masses
    Nasr, Eman
    Hamed, Ikram
    Abbas, Iman
    Khalifa, Nagat M.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 45 (03): : 975 - 985
  • [33] Renal masses: Quantitative assessment of enhancement with dynamic MR imaging
    Ho, VB
    Allen, SF
    Hood, MN
    Choyke, PL
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (03) : 695 - 700
  • [34] Nondynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast
    Fukuda, Y
    Honda, C
    Miida, K
    Nakata, N
    Harada, J
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 26 - 26
  • [35] Contrast enhanced MR breast imaging using ASSET
    Liu, Y
    Breger, R
    Estkowski, L
    King, K
    Hoppel, B
    Hollrith, T
    Yanny, L
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1219 - 1219
  • [36] Spiral imaging for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Poonawalla, AH
    Stafford, RJ
    Glover, GH
    Hazle, JD
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 196 - 196
  • [37] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in cancer
    O'Connor, James P. B.
    Watson, Yvonne
    Jackson, Alan
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2007, 13 : E45 - E53
  • [38] Reproducibility of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    Cuenod, Charles-Andre
    Balvay, Daniel
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (02) : 619 - 621
  • [39] Dual dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Miyati, T
    Banno, T
    Mase, M
    Kasai, H
    Shundo, H
    Imazawa, M
    Ohba, S
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 7 (01) : 230 - 235
  • [40] Enhancement of the nipple-areolar-complex on contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast
    Buadu A.A.
    Buadu L.D.
    Murakami J.
    Murayama S.
    Hashiguchi N.
    Masuda K.
    Breast Cancer, 1998, 5 (3) : 285 - 289