Identification of patients with potential palliative care needs: A systematic review of screening tools in primary care

被引:61
|
作者
ElMokhallalati, Yousuf [1 ]
Bradley, Stephen H. [1 ]
Chapman, Emma [1 ]
Ziegler, Lucy [1 ]
Murtagh, Fliss E. M. [2 ]
Johnson, Miriam J. [2 ]
Bennett, Michael, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci LIHS, Sch Med, Acad Unit Palliat Care, Room 10-39,Level 10,Worsley Bldg,Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9NL, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Hull, Wolfson Palliat Care Res Ctr, Hull York Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
关键词
Palliative care; terminal care; mass screening; primary health care; systematic review; advance care planning; symptom assessment; terminally ill; ADVANCED CANCER; SURPRISE QUESTION; GENERAL-PRACTICE; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; MORTALITY; IDENTIFY; PEOPLE; TRAJECTORIES; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1177/0269216320929552
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Despite increasing evidence of the benefits of early access to palliative care, many patients do not receive palliative care in a timely manner. A systematic approach in primary care can facilitate earlier identification of patients with potential palliative care needs and prompt further assessment. Aim: To identify existing screening tools for identification of patients with advanced progressive diseases who are likely to have palliative care needs in primary healthcare and evaluate their accuracy. Design: Systematic review (PROSPERO registration number CRD42019111568). Data sources: Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to March 2019 Results: From 4,127 unique articles screened, 25 reported the use or development of 10 screening tools. Most tools use prediction of death and/or deterioration as a proxy for the identification of people with potential palliative care needs. The tools are based on a wide range of general and disease-specific indicators. The accuracy of five tools was assessed in eight studies; these tools differed significantly in their ability to identify patients with potential palliative care needs with sensitivity ranging from 3% to 94% and specificity ranging from 26% to 99%. Conclusion: The ability of current screening tools to identify patients with advanced progressive diseases who are likely to have palliative care needs in primary care is limited. Further research is needed to identify standardised screening processes that are based not only on predicting mortality and deterioration but also on anticipating the palliative care needs and predicting the rate and course of functional decline. This would prompt a comprehensive assessment to identify and meet their needs on time.
引用
收藏
页码:989 / 1005
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Palliative care in Parkinson's disease: review of needs assessment tools
    Richfield, Edward W.
    Johnson, Miriam J.
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 9 : S6 - S15
  • [33] Palliative care in glioblastoma patients: a systematic review
    Coronatto, Ligia Henriques
    Formentin, Cleiton
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2024, 70
  • [34] Palliative care in glioblastoma patients: a systematic review
    Coronatto, Ligia Henriques
    Formentin, Cleiton
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2024, 70
  • [35] The needs, models of care, interventions and outcomes of palliative care in the Caribbean: a systematic review of the evidence
    Maharaj, Sandhya
    Harding, Richard
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2016, 15
  • [36] The needs, models of care, interventions and outcomes of palliative care in the Caribbean: a systematic review of the evidence
    Sandhya Maharaj
    Richard Harding
    BMC Palliative Care, 15
  • [37] A systematic review of classifications systems to determine complexity of patient care needs in palliative care
    Grant, Matthew
    de Graaf, Everlien
    Teunissen, Saskia
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 35 (04) : 636 - 650
  • [38] Systematic review of barriers and enablers to the delivery of palliative care by primary care practitioners
    Carey, Mariko L.
    Zucca, Alison C.
    Freund, Megan A. G.
    Bryant, Jamie
    Herrmann, Anne
    Roberts, Bernadette J.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 33 (09) : 1131 - 1145
  • [39] Family history tools for primary care: A systematic review
    Mirosevic, Spela
    Klemenc-Ketis, Zalika
    Peterlin, Borut
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (01) : 75 - 86
  • [40] Palliative Care Screening and Assessment in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review
    George, Naomi
    Phillips, Elizabeth
    Zaurova, Milana
    Song, Carolyn
    Lamba, Sangeeta
    Grudzen, Corita
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 51 (01) : 108 - 119