Effects of pain acceptance and pain control strategies on physical impairment in individuals with chronic low back pain

被引:67
|
作者
Vowles, Kevin E. [1 ,2 ]
McNeil, Daniel W. [2 ]
Gross, Richard T. [3 ]
McDaniel, Michael L. [3 ]
Mouse, Angela [3 ]
Bates, Mick [4 ]
Gallimore, Paula [4 ]
McCall, Cindy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Bath BA1 1RL, Avon, England
[2] W Virginia Univ, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[3] Oasis Occupat Rehabil & Pain Management, Morgantown, WV USA
[4] Bodyworks Phys Therapy & Rehabil, Beckley, WV USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.beth.2007.02.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Psychosocial treatments for chronic pain are effective. There is a need, however, to understand the processes involved in determining how these treatments contribute to behavior change. Control and acceptance strategies represent two potentially important processes involved in treatment, although they differ significantly in approach. Results from laboratory-based studies suggest that acceptance-oriented strategies significantly enhance pain tolerance and behavioral persistence, compared with control-oriented strategies. There is a need, however, to investigate processes of acceptance and control directly in clinical settings. The present study investigated the effects of three brief instructional sets (pain control, pain acceptance, continued practice) on demonstrated physical impairment in 74 individuals with chronic low back pain using an analogue experimental design. After controlling for baseline performance, the pain acceptance group demonstrated greater overall functioning on a set of 7 standardized physical tasks relative to the other two groups, which did not differ from one another. Further, the acceptance group exhibited a 16.3% improvement in impairment, whereas the pain control group worsened by 8.3 % and the continued practice group improved by 2.5 %. These results suggest that acceptance may be a key process involved in behavior change in individuals with chronic pain.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 425
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Re: Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain.
    Hart, DL
    Werneke, MW
    SPINE, 2004, 29 (21) : 2475 - 2476
  • [32] OBJECTIVE CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT IN CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN
    WADDELL, G
    SOMERVILLE, D
    HENDERSON, I
    NEWTON, M
    SPINE, 1992, 17 (06) : 617 - 628
  • [33] Chronic low back pain as a somatoform pain disorder
    Egle, U. T.
    Nickel, R.
    ORTHOPADE, 2008, 37 (04): : 280 - +
  • [34] Pain medications for acute and chronic low back pain
    Wertli, M. M.
    Steurer, J.
    INTERNIST, 2018, 59 (11): : 1214 - 1223
  • [35] Fear Avoidance Beliefs and physical function in elderly individuals with chronic low back pain
    Basler, H. -D
    Quint, S.
    Wolf, U.
    SCHMERZ, 2006, 20 (03): : 189 - +
  • [36] THE PAIN DRAWING AND WADDELL NONORGANIC PHYSICAL SIGNS IN CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN
    CHAN, CW
    GOLDMAN, S
    ILSTRUP, DM
    KUNSELMAN, AR
    ONEILL, PI
    SPINE, 1993, 18 (13) : 1717 - 1722
  • [37] Effects of Pain Expectations On Neuromuscular Control of the Spine in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Healthy Participants
    Henchoz, Yves
    Tetreau, Charles
    Abboud, Jacques
    Piche, Mathieu
    Descarreaux, Martin
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2012, 64 (10): : S1122 - S1122
  • [38] Chronic low back pain
    Borenstein, DG
    RHEUMATIC DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 22 (03) : 439 - +
  • [39] Chronic low back pain
    Simpson A.K.
    Cholewicki J.
    Grauer J.
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2006, 10 (6) : 431 - 436
  • [40] Chronic low back pain
    Van Tulder, Maurits
    Koes, Bart
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2006, 74 (09) : 1577 - 1579