Attributional life cycle assessment of biofuels for shipping: Addressing alternative geographical locations and cultivation systems

被引:26
|
作者
Kesieme, Uchenna [1 ,2 ]
Pazouki, Kayvan [2 ]
Murphy, Alan [2 ]
Chrysanthou, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hertfordshire, Sch Engn & Technol, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Engn & Marine Sci, Queen Victoria Rd, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; SVO; Biodiesel; Emission and shipping; LIQUEFIED NATURAL-GAS; MARINE FUELS; EMISSIONS; BIODIESEL; OIL; LCA; VARIABILITY; RAPESEED; CHOICES; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.036
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a life cycle assessment of straight vegetable oil (SVO) and biodiesel addressing alternative upstream pathways. The pathways are SVO and biodiesel produced in the United Kingdom (UK) using European rapeseed and also, SVO and biodiesel produced in the UK using soybean grain and soybean oil imported from Argentina. Four environmental impact categories have been assessed using the SimaPro (ReCiPe life-cycle impact assessment) method: this includes global warming potential (GWP); acidification; eutrophication and particulate matter. Rapeseed based biofuel had the lowest emission impact in terms of GHG emissions. Significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can result from land use change due to the expansion and cultivation of soybean in Argentina. When land use change is not considered, the soy based biofuel system has the lowest GHG impact with more than 70% GHG emission reduction. The GHG emission at cultivation stage far outweighs the impacts of the other life-cycle stages irrespective of the feedstock used for the biofuel production systems. The use of fertilizers and associated soil emissions are the main contributors. The environmental impacts of biofuel can be reduced by avoiding land use change, improving soil management practices and yield, and also optimizing transportation routes. Effective implementation of options for biofuels production were explored to improve sustainability in shipping.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 104
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Climate change mitigation of drop-in biofuels for deep-sea shipping under a prospective life-cycle assessment
    Watanabe, Marcos Djun Barbosa
    Cherubini, Francesco
    Cavalett, Otavio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 364
  • [32] Coupling attributional and consequential life cycle assessment: A matter of social responsibility
    Brander, Matthew
    Burritt, Roger L.
    Christ, Katherine L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 215 : 514 - 521
  • [33] Attributional life cycle assessment: is a land-use baseline necessary?
    Sampo Soimakallio
    Annette Cowie
    Miguel Brandão
    Göran Finnveden
    Tomas Ekvall
    Martin Erlandsson
    Kati Koponen
    Per-Erik Karlsson
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 : 1364 - 1375
  • [34] Relevance of attributional and consequential life cycle assessment for society and decision support
    Schaubroeck, Thomas
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 4
  • [35] Life cycle assessment of an apartment building: comparison of an attributional and consequential approach
    Buyle, Matthias
    Braet, Johan
    Audenaert, Amaryllis
    [J]. 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABILITY IN ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 62 : 132 - 140
  • [36] Decarbonising international shipping - A life cycle perspective on alternative fuel options
    Tomos, Branwen Ap Dafydd
    Stamford, Laurence
    Welfle, Andrew
    Larkin, Alice
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 299
  • [37] Life Cycle Assessment of Third Generation Biofuels Production.
    Pardo, Yeniffer
    Sanchez, Eduardo
    Kafarov, Viatcheslav
    [J]. PRES 2010: 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, 2010, 21 : 1177 - 1182
  • [38] A framework for using the handprint concept in attributional life cycle (sustainability) assessment
    Alvarenga, R. A. F.
    Huysveld, S.
    Taelman, S. E.
    Sfez, S.
    Preat, N.
    Cooreman-Algoed, M.
    Sanjuan-Delmas, D.
    Dewulf, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 265
  • [39] Comparison of Life Cycle Impact Assessment tools in the case of biofuels
    Landis, Amy E.
    Theis, Thomas L.
    [J]. 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2008, : 7 - +
  • [40] A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Analysis of Liquid Biofuels Production
    Koroneos, Christopher
    Anastasiou, Foteini
    Diatrios, Rovas
    [J]. COMPUTING AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUES IN SCIENCES, 2008, : 218 - +