Cross-National Focus Group Response to Autonomous Vehicles

被引:1
|
作者
Norton, Thomas A. [1 ]
Ruhl, Melissa [1 ]
Armitage, Tim [1 ]
Matthews, Brian [2 ]
Miles, John [3 ]
机构
[1] Arup, London, England
[2] Civ Off City Milton Keynes, Milton Keynes, Bucks, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Cambridge, England
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0361198121992363
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The development of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is advancing quickly in some enclaves around the world. Consequently, AVs exist in the public consciousness, featuring regularly in mainstream media. As the form and function of AVs emerge, the attitudes of potential users become more important. The extent to which the public trusts AV technology and anticipates benefits, will drive consumer willingness to use AVs. Broadly, public attitudes will determine whether AVs can attract public investment in infrastructure and become a feature of the future transport mix or fail to realize the potential their developers assert. As part of UK Autodrive, a program trialing the introduction of AVs in the United Kingdom, researchers conducted focus groups in five UK cities, and a comparison focus group in San Francisco (December 2017 to September 2018) using representative samples (total n = 137). Focus group facilitators guided discussions in three areas considered central to usage decisions: trust in the technology, ownership models, and community benefit. This paper describes findings from a quasi-quantitative study supported with qualitative insights. This research provides three key takeaways centering on trust in the technology and in delivering benefit. First, some participants gain trust through experience and others through evidence. Second, participants had difficulty discriminating between AV developers, indicating a need for industry cooperation. Third, partnerships were found to demonstrate trust, highlighting the need for more and deeper partnerships moving forward. Generally, participants had positive attitudes toward AVs and expect AVs to provide benefits. However, these attitudes and expectations could change as AV development progresses.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 351
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] NATIONAL IDENTITY - A CROSS-NATIONAL COMPARISON
    LARSEN, K
    KRUM, K
    GYORGY, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 27 (3-4) : 558 - 558
  • [22] Response Style Differences in Cross-National ResearchDispositional and Situational Determinants
    Anne-Wil Harzing
    Michelle Brown
    Kathrin Köster
    Shuming Zhao
    [J]. Management International Review, 2012, 52 : 341 - 363
  • [23] NATIONAL PRIDE IN CROSS-NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
    ROSE, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 1985, 37 (01) : 85 - 96
  • [25] Integration of shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) into existing transportation services: A focus group study
    Etminani-Ghasrodashti, Roya
    Patel, Ronik Ketankumar
    Kermanshachi, Sharareh
    Rosenberger, Jay Michael
    Weinreich, David
    Foss, Ann
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 12
  • [26] Reliance on E-shopping Vehicles: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Cross-National Market Differences
    Blake, Brian F.
    LaRosa, Richard J.
    Neuendorf, Kimberly A.
    Yang Luming
    Hudzinski, Karen
    Zhou, Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL CONSUMER MARKETING, 2018, 30 (02) : 70 - 84
  • [27] CROSS-NATIONAL PERCEPTIONS OF TEACHERS
    JUDGE, HG
    [J]. COMPARATIVE EDUCATION REVIEW, 1988, 32 (02) : 143 - 158
  • [28] Cross-National Patterns of Terrorism
    LaFree, Gary
    Morris, Nancy A.
    Dugan, Laura
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2010, 50 (04): : 622 - 649
  • [29] AGING IN CROSS-NATIONAL CONTEXTS
    Ailshire, Jennifer
    Choi, Eunyoung
    [J]. INNOVATION IN AGING, 2022, 6 : 379 - 379
  • [30] A cross-national study of calculus
    Chai, Jun
    Friedler, Louis M.
    Wolff, Edward F.
    Li, Jun
    Rhea, Karen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL EDUCATION IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 46 (04) : 481 - 494