Redesign and Validation of Sisom, an Interactive Assessment and Communication Tool for Children With Cancer

被引:28
|
作者
Arvidsson, Susann [1 ]
Gilljam, Britt-Mari [1 ,2 ]
Nygren, Jens [1 ]
Ruland, Cornelia Maria [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Nordby-Boe, Trude [3 ]
Svedberg, Petra [1 ]
机构
[1] RN Halmstad Univ, Sch Hlth & Welf, Halmstad, Sweden
[2] Reg Halland, Halmstad, Sweden
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Ctr Shared Decis Making & Collaborat Care Res CSD, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Oslo, Norway
来源
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH | 2016年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
cancer; children; communication; mobile app; participation; validation; HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS; DECISION-MAKING CHILDREN; PARTICIPATION; ADOLESCENTS; PARENTS; EMPOWERMENT; PERCEPTIONS; PERSPECTIVE; TECHNOLOGY; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.2196/mhealth.5715
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Children with cancer undergo intensive and long treatment periods that expose them and their families to a number of difficult physical, mental, and social challenges. Empowering children by actively involving them in their care can help them to cope with these challenges. It can, however, be difficult for children to be involved and talk about their illness experiences in a "traditional" conversation with health care professionals, especially for younger children. Sisom (Norwegian acronym "Si det som det er" or "Tell it how it is") is an interactive computer-based assessment and communication tool to give children (aged 6-12 years) with cancer a "voice" in their care. Because of technological advances and widespread use of mobile devices Sisom had to be redesigned to better meet the needs of children of today. Objective: To redesign Sisom for use on mobile devices and to validate and adapt it for use in a Swedish population of children with cancer. Methods: A user-experience design was used. Content adaptation included forward-backward translation by Swedish and Norwegian translators. Healthy children (n=5), children with experiences of cancer treatment (n=5) and their parents (n=5), and pediatric nurses (n=2) were then involved in culturally adapting Sisom to the Swedish context. The iterative low-and high-fidelity evaluation was supported by a think aloud method, semistructured interviews, and drawings to capture children's views of Sisom. The redesign and evaluation continued until no further changes or improvements were identified by the participants or the researchers. Results: Children, parents, and pediatric nurses offered many suggestions for improvements to the original version in terms of content, aesthetics, and usability of Sisom. The most significant change that emerged through user input was a modification that entailed not using problem-focused statements in the assessment items. The parents and pediatric nurses considered the revised assessment items to be general and less diagnosis specific. The evaluation of aesthetics resulted in brighter colors and more positive and exciting details in the animations. The evaluation of usability included improvements of the verbal instructions on how to navigate in Sisom 2, and also that the answers to assessment items in Sisom 2 should be saved to provide the children with the option to pause and to continue answering the remaining assessment items at a later stage. Conclusions: Overall, this paper describes the process of using user-experience design with children in order to redesign and validate an interactive assessment and communication tool and how the outcomes of this process resulted in a new version, Sisom 2. All participants confirmed the usability and qualities of using the final version. Future research should be directed toward the implementation of Sisom 2 in clinical practice and to evaluate outcomes from individual and organizational levels.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 565
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] iRest: interactive Rehabilitation and assessment tool
    Rabman, Hisyam Abdul
    Xiang, Khor Kang
    Fai, Yeong Che
    Narayanan, Aqilah Leela T.
    Ming, Eileen Su Lee
    Khan, Qamer Iqbal
    2015 10TH ASIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ASCC), 2015,
  • [42] A tool for supporting graphical interactive assessment
    Boehm, K
    Dietze, L
    ED-MEDIA 2004: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Vols. 1-7, 2004, : 881 - 888
  • [43] Assessment and redesign of a unit on proportionality using the Didactical Suitability tool
    Esque de los Ojos, Daniel
    Breda, Adriana
    UNICIENCIA, 2021, 35 (01) : 38 - 54
  • [44] Validation of a Concussion Assessment Tool
    Taravath, Sasidharan
    Peedin, Megan
    Williams, Mark
    Lecci, Len
    Keith, Julian
    NEUROLOGY, 2019, 93 (14) : S2 - S2
  • [45] Validation of the caffeine assessment tool
    Curran, K.
    Boylan, S. M.
    Cade, J. E.
    Kirk, S. F. L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 2005, 64 : 101A - 101A
  • [46] Development and Validation of a Collaborative Behaviors Objective Assessment Tool for End-of-Life Communication
    Blackhall, Leslie J.
    Erickson, Jeanne
    Brashers, Valentina
    Owen, John
    Thomas, Shannon
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 17 (01) : 68 - 74
  • [47] Development and validation of Korean breast cancer risk assessment tool.
    Chang, M-C
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (02) : 275S - 275S
  • [48] Development and content validation of the Assessment of Burden of ColoRectal Cancer (ABCRC)-tool
    te Boome, Iris
    Somers, Anne M. J.
    Graupner, Caitlin
    Kimman, Merel L.
    Gidding-Slok, Annerika H. M.
    Breukink, Stephanie O.
    EJSO, 2022, 48 (08): : 1807 - 1814
  • [49] Validation of the Spanish Version of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) in Pediatric Cancer
    Kazak, Anne E.
    Hwang, Wei-Ting
    Chen, Fang Fang
    Askins, Martha A.
    Carlson, Olivia
    Argueta-Ortiz, Francisco
    Vega, Gabriela
    Barakat, Lamia P.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 43 (10) : 1104 - 1113
  • [50] Development and Validation of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool (BAT) in Cancer Patients
    Webber, Katherine
    Davies, Andrew N.
    Zeppetella, Giovambattista
    Cowie, Martin R.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2014, 48 (04) : 619 - 631