Renewable energy scenarios for costs reductions in the European Union

被引:17
|
作者
Bigerna, Simona [1 ]
Bollino, Carlo Andrea [1 ]
Micheli, Silvia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Perugia, Dept Econ, Via Pascoli 20, I-06123 Perugia, Italy
[2] Guglielmo Marconi Univ, Dept Econ & Business Sci, Via Plinio 44, I-00193 Rome, Italy
关键词
Renewable energy policy; Cost minimization; 2030 EU climate and energy policies; Learning rates; LEARNING RATES; SOLAR PV; POLICY; ELECTRICITY; CLIMATE; TRADE; TECHNOLOGIES; COOPERATION; OPTIONS; CURVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In 2014, the European Commission proposed a new renewable energy sources (RES) target in energy consumption by 2030 "to be delivered collectively" by the European Union as a whole, leaving unresolved the question of allocation among member countries. The aim of this paper is to propose and simulate a model of coordinated action among member countries based on two pillars, RES national binding targets and a quantitative cost minimization procedure based on a general translog function. We have considered RES national targets in three sectors: electricity, heating and cooling, transport. RES costs are differentiated according to learning-by-doing and RES productivity diffusion processes at the various RES production,sites in the European Union. Three different scenarios are simulated and compared with the baseline case constituted by the 2020 cumulative RES target. The results show that, compared with the baseline, the costs of achieving RES binding targets, with the proposed decision process, can be reduced by up to 13% by 2030. These cost evaluations indicate that it is more efficient to produce RES in those countries that face lower technology costs, according to the comparative advantages of their territorial localization and the importance of the initial RES policy efforts. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 90
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysing the effectiveness of renewable energy supporting policies in the European Union
    Harmelink, M
    Voogt, M
    Cremer, C
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (03) : 343 - 351
  • [32] Innovation in technology: A game changer for renewable energy in the European Union?
    Xinyu, Wang
    Haoran, Liu
    Khan, Khalid
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 2024,
  • [33] ECONOMIC EXPANSION OF THE EUROPEAN RENEWABLE ENERGY MARKET IN CASE OF EUROPEAN UNION LAW
    Dmitrovich, Bilotskiy Sergiy
    Viktorovna, Danylova Nicole
    [J]. MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS, 2014, (04): : 136 - 145
  • [34] Renewable Energy in the European Union: An Econometric approach to trends and effects
    Jesus Lopez, Ana
    Moreno, Blanca
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOSCIENCES, (BIOSCIENCESWORLD 2010), 2010, : 95 - 98
  • [35] A regional coordination framework for renewable energy policy in the European Union
    Karmacharya, Sharad B.
    de Vries, Laurens J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2009, 39 (1-2) : 128 - 141
  • [36] Measuring Renewable Energy Development in the Eastern Bloc of the European Union
    Momete, Daniela Cristina
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (12)
  • [37] The Development of Renewable Energy Sources in the European Union in the Light of the European Green Deal
    Milek, Dorota
    Nowak, Paulina
    Latosinska, Jolanta
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (15)
  • [38] Renewable Energy and Socio-economic Development in the European Union
    Djuran, Jelena
    Golusin, Mirjana
    Ivanovic, Olja Munitlak
    Jovanovic, Larisa
    Andrejevic, Andrea
    [J]. PROBLEMY EKOROZWOJU, 2013, 8 (01): : 105 - 114
  • [39] The Energy from Renewable Sources in the European Union: Achieving the Goals
    Angheluta, Sorin Petrica
    Burlacu, Sorin
    Diaconu, Amelia
    Curea, Cristina Stefania
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 8 (05): : 57 - 65
  • [40] The Future of Nuclear Power and Renewable Energy Sources in the European Union
    Kaygusuz, K.
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2008, 3 (04) : 348 - 361