Confidence intervals of the difference between areas under two ROC curves in matched-pair experiments

被引:6
|
作者
Zhang, Yunqi [1 ]
Tang, Niansheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Yunnan Univ, Yunnan Key Lab Stat Modeling & Data Anal, Kunming 650091, Yunnan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
bootstrap-resampling method; confidence interval; difference between two correlated AUCs; hybrid method; matched-pair design; OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CONSTRUCTION; INFERENCE; RATIO;
D O I
10.1002/sim.8562
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In a matched-pair study, when outcomes of two diagnostic tests are ordinal/continuous, the difference between two correlated areas under ROC curves (AUCs) is usually used to compare the overall discriminatory ability of two diagnostic tests. This article considers confidence interval (CI) construction problems of difference between two correlated AUCs in a matched-pair experiment, and proposes 13 hybrid CIs based on variance estimates recovery with the maximum likelihood estimation, Delong's statistic, Wilson score statistic (WS) and WS with continuity correction, the modified Wald statistic (MW) and MW with continuity correction and Agresti-Coull statistic, and three Bootstrap-resampling-based CIs. For comparison, we present traditional parametric and nonparametric CIs. Simulation studies are conducted to assess the performance of the proposed CIs in terms of empirical coverage probabilities, empirical interval widths, and ratios of the mesial noncoverage probabilities to the noncoverage probabilities. Two examples from clinical studies are illustrated by the proposed methodologies. Empirical results evidence that the hybrid Agresti-Coull CI with the empirical estimation (EAC) behaved most satisfactorily because its coverage probability was quite close to the prespecified confidence level with short interval width. Hence, we recommend the usage of the EAC CI in applications.
引用
收藏
页码:2621 / 2638
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Improved Confidence Intervals for the Difference between Two Proportions
    Reed, James F., III
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN APPLIED STATISTICAL METHODS, 2009, 8 (01) : 208 - 214
  • [12] Confidence intervals for the difference between two relative risks
    Sampson, Joshua N.
    Gail, Mitchell H.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (10) : 3048 - 3058
  • [13] CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO PARTIAL AUCS
    Huang, Xin
    Qin, Gengsheng
    Yuan, Yan
    Zhou, Xiao-hua
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2012, 54 (01) : 63 - 79
  • [14] Confidence Intervals for Difference Between Two Poisson Rates
    Li, Hui-Qiong
    Tang, Man-Lai
    Poon, Wai-Yin
    Tang, Nian-Sheng
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2011, 40 (09) : 1478 - 1493
  • [15] Equivalence Assessment via the Difference Between Two AUCs in a Matched-Pair Design with Nonignorable Missing Endpoints
    Zhang, Yunqi
    Cheng, Weili
    Zhao, Puying
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS, 2024,
  • [16] Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched-pair design
    Imai, Kosuke
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (24) : 4857 - 4873
  • [17] A non-inferiority test of areas under two parametric ROC curves
    Jin, Hua
    Lu, Ying
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 30 (04) : 375 - 379
  • [18] Approximate and Fiducial Confidence Intervals for the Difference Between Two Binomial Proportions
    Krishnamoorthy, K.
    Zhang, Dan
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2015, 44 (08) : 1745 - 1759
  • [19] Confidence Intervals for Mean Difference Between Two Delta-Distributions
    Rosales, Karen V.
    Naranjo, Joshua D.
    [J]. ROBUST RANK-BASED AND NONPARAMETRIC METHODS, 2016, 168 : 261 - 272
  • [20] POINT ESTIMATES AND CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE 2-SAMPLE AND MATCHED-PAIR COMBINED TESTS FOR RANKS AND NORMAL SCORES
    CURTIS, DA
    MARASCUILO, LA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 1992, 60 (03): : 243 - 269