Digital finance and corporate green innovation: quantity or quality?

被引:84
|
作者
Rao, Shuya [1 ]
Pan, Ye [2 ]
He, Jianing [3 ]
Shangguan, Xuming [4 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Informat, Guiyang 550525, Peoples R China
[2] Guizhou Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business Adm, Guiyang 550525, Peoples R China
[3] York Univ, Master Financial Accountabil, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Xinyang Normal Univ, Business Coll, Xinyang 464000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Digital finance; Corporate green innovation quantity; Corporate green innovation quality; Micro explanation; PRODUCT INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE; CONSTRAINTS; COMPETITION; SERVICES; FINTECH; CHINA;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-19785-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recently, the rapid development of digital finance in China has exerted a subtle influence on many aspects of social and economic development. However, the research on the impact of digital finance on corporate green innovation is rather lacking. In order to fill this gap, this paper uses the "Peking University Digital Finance Index" to evaluate the micro impact of financial innovation development on environmental governance from the firm level. The results show that digital finance can significantly improve the quantity and quality of corporate green innovation, and this effect still exists after considering endogeneity and a series of robustness tests. The promotion effect of digital finance on the quantity and quality of corporate green innovation is more obvious in state-owned, eastern, and mature enterprises. In addition, we find the mechanism behind the positive relationship between digital finance and corporate green innovation: digital finance makes firms more transparent and funds flow more convenient. Overall, this paper provides a micro explanation of environmental governance for the accelerated popularization of digital finance in emerging markets, which is urgently needed for most emerging economies seeking high-quality development.
引用
收藏
页码:56772 / 56791
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantity or quality: Environmental legislation and corporate green innovations
    Huang, Xiaoqi
    Liu, Wei
    Zhang, Zhan
    Zou, Xinyu
    Li, Pujuan
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 204
  • [32] Green merger and acquisition and green technology innovation: Stimulating quantity or quality?
    Zhang, Yan
    Sun, Ziyuan
    Zhou, Yiqiang
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 103
  • [33] Green finance, environmental quality and technological innovation in China
    Su, Yan
    Lee, Chien-Chiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2023,
  • [34] Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Finance and Environmental Performance: Does Green Innovation Matter?
    Dai, Xiaofei
    Siddik, Abu Bakkar
    Tian, Huawei
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [35] Does green finance reform promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China
    Jia, Junsheng
    He, Xiaoyu
    Zhu, Taiyu
    Zhang, Eryu
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 82
  • [36] Managers' Digital Literacy and Corporate Green Technology Innovation
    Wang, Xia
    Wu, Jiaqi
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF BUSINESS RESEARCH IN CHINA, 2023, 18 (03) : 214 - 243
  • [37] Can digital transformation improve corporate green innovation?
    He, Kang
    Chen, Wanyi
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [38] Digital finance and innovation inequality: evidence from green technological innovation in China
    Feng, Suling
    Chong, Yu
    Li, Guoxiang
    Zhang, Shubo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (58) : 87884 - 87900
  • [39] Digital finance and innovation inequality: evidence from green technological innovation in China
    Suling Feng
    Yu Chong
    Guoxiang Li
    Shubo Zhang
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 87884 - 87900
  • [40] Climbing the quality ladder of green innovation: Does green finance matter?
    Huang, Hongyun
    Mbanyele, William
    Wang, Fengrong
    Song, Malin
    Wang, Yuzhang
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 184