The dimensionality of the UWES-17 and UWES-9: Testing second-order and bifactor models

被引:5
|
作者
Sanhokwe, Hamfrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Midlands State Univ, Grad Sch Business Leadership, Gweru, Zimbabwe
关键词
bifactor models; job demands and resources; second-order; UWES; WORK ENGAGEMENT SCALE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; FACTORIAL VALIDITY; JOB RESOURCES; FIT INDEXES; VERSION; CONSERVATION; COMMUNITY; DEMANDS;
D O I
10.1080/14330237.2022.2027616
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Extant research on the factor structure of the Utrecht Work Engagement Survey (UWES) across multiple study settings has consistently produced conflicting results. The study examined the dimensionality of the UWES-17 and UWES-9 using second-order and bifactor models. Cross-sectional data were collected from 213 employees in the private (n = 70), non-governmental (n = 73), and government (n = 70) sectors. The sample comprised more men (61%) than women (39%). The mean age was 38.6 years (SD = 8.87 years). Results from data analyses in R and the Bifactor Indices calculator yielded inconclusive second-order models. The bifactor analysis demonstrated the presence of a strong general factor for both the UWES-17 and UWES-9. The criterion related validity of the UWES-17 and UWES-9 was supported. UWES total scores appear valid for assessing levels of work engagement in diverse sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 122
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Dimensionality of the UWES-17: An item response modelling analysis
    de Bruin, Gideon P.
    Hill, Carin
    Henn, Carolina M.
    Muller, Klaus-Peter
    [J]. SA JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 39 (02)
  • [2] DIMENSIONALITY OF THE 9-ITEM UTRECHT WORK ENGAGEMENT SCALE (UWES-9)
    de Bruin, Gideon P.
    Henn, Carolina M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2013, 112 (03) : 788 - 799
  • [3] Brazil-Portugal Transcultural Adaptation of the UWES-9: Internal Consistency, Dimensionality, and Measurement Invariance
    Sinval, Jorge
    Pasian, Sonia
    Queiros, Cristina
    Maroco, Joao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [4] A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life
    Chen, Fang Fang
    West, Stephen G.
    Sousa, Karen H.
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2006, 41 (02) : 189 - 225
  • [5] When and why the second-order and bifactor models are distinguishable
    Mansolf, Maxwell
    Reise, Steven P.
    [J]. INTELLIGENCE, 2017, 61 : 120 - 129
  • [6] Finding Pure Submodels for Improved Differentiation of Bifactor and Second-Order Models
    Yang, Renjie
    Spirtes, Peter
    Scheines, Richard
    Reise, Steven P.
    Mansoff, Maxwell
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2017, 24 (03) : 402 - 413
  • [7] Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models
    Chen, FF
    Sousa, KH
    West, SG
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2005, 12 (03) : 471 - 492
  • [8] A Note on Comparing the Bifactor and Second-Order Factor Models: Is the Bayesian Information Criterion a Routinely Dependable Index for Model Selection?
    Raykov, Tenko
    DiStefano, Christine
    Calvocoressi, Lisa
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2024, 84 (02) : 271 - 288
  • [9] Differentiating Response Styles and Construct-Related Responses: A New IRT Approach Using Bifactor and Second-Order Models
    von Davier, Matthias
    Khorramdel, Lale
    [J]. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN QUANTITATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 : 463 - 487
  • [10] Steady State Accuracy of Second-Order Generator Dynamic Models in Generator Parameter Validation Testing
    Wang, Quincy Y.
    Wang, Song
    [J]. 2020 IEEE ELECTRIC POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE (EPEC), 2020,