Tools for spatially modeling ecosystem services: Publication trends, conceptual reflections and future challenges

被引:82
|
作者
Ochoa, Vivian [1 ,2 ]
Urbina-Cardona, Nicolas [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Invest Recursos Biol Alexander von Humboldt, Bogota, Colombia
[2] Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Fac Environm & Rural Studies, Dept Ecol & Terr, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
Millenium ecosystem assessment; Soil Water Assessment Tool; Hydrological basin; Spatial resolution and scale; ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem; Services; Fog Interception for the Enhancement of Streamflow in Tropical Areas; WATER ASSESSMENT-TOOL; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; IMPACT; CHINA; CLASSIFICATION; DYNAMICS; NEEDS; RIVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.011
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We analyze scientific literature that report tools to spatially model ecosystem services (ES). In the 65 articles reviewed, the most used model starting in 2001 was SWAT and starting in 2009 the most commonly used was InVEST. Eighty percent of the scientific articles have been published from 2010 to 2015 suggesting that spatial modeling of ES is an emergent research field. Only 4 of the 9 tools encountered in our review are backed by papers, the others only offer grey literature. The spatial modeling of ES is mainly done in the U.S.A. and China, and the most frequently evaluated ES are related to hydrological services (water provision and quality treatment), climate regulation and soil formation. Most of the studies are done along hydrological basins, at different spatial scales and based upon different map resolution ranging from 20 to 900 m. With concern, we observe the lack of validation of the spatial models and the tools' lack of integrated validation modules. As long as the tools used to spatially model ecosystem services continue to be used as black boxes, the models they generate will suffer from a high degree of uncertainty and will not be reliable for decision making purposes. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 169
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Current Challenges and Future Trends in Analytical Fragility and Vulnerability Modeling
    Silva, Vitor
    Akkar, Sinan
    Baker, Jack
    Bazzurro, Paolo
    Castro, Jose Miguel
    Crowley, Helen
    Dolsek, Matjaz
    Galasso, Carmine
    Lagomarsino, Sergio
    Monteiro, Ricardo
    Perrone, Daniele
    Pitilakis, Kyriazis
    Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2019, 35 (04) : 1927 - 1952
  • [22] Identifying governance challenges in ecosystem services management - Conceptual considerations and comparison of global forest cases
    Falk, Thomas
    Spangenberg, Joachim H.
    Siegmund-Schultze, Marianna
    Kobbe, Susanne
    Feike, Til
    Kuebler, Daniel
    Settele, Josef
    Vorlaufer, Tobias
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 32 : 193 - 203
  • [23] Trends and Future Potential of Payment for Ecosystem Services to Alleviate Rural Poverty in Developing Countries
    Milder, Jeffrey C.
    Scherr, Sara J.
    Bracer, Carina
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2010, 15 (02):
  • [24] Flexible Modeling Tools for Pre-Requirements Analysis: Conceptual Architecture and Research Challenges
    Ossher, Harold
    Bellamy, Rachel
    Simmonds, Ian
    Amid, David
    Anaby-Tavor, Ateret
    Callery, Matthew
    Desmond, Michael
    de Vries, Jacqueline
    Fisher, Amit
    Krasikov, Sophia
    ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES, 2010, 45 (10) : 848 - 864
  • [25] Ecosystem services in Antarctica: Global assessment of the current state, future challenges and managing opportunities
    Pertierra, L. R.
    Santos-Martin, F.
    Hughes, K. A.
    Avila, C.
    Caceres, J. O.
    De Filippo, D.
    Gonzalez, S.
    Grant, S. M.
    Lynch, H.
    Marina-Montes, C.
    Quesada, A.
    Tejedo, P.
    Tin, T.
    Benayas, J.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 49
  • [26] Managing Peatland Ecosystem Services: Current UK Policy and Future Challenges in a Changing World
    Whitfield, Stephen
    Reed, Mark
    Thomson, Ken
    Christie, Mike
    Stringer, Lindsay C.
    Quinn, Claire H.
    Anderson, Russell
    Moxey, Andrew
    Hubacek, Klaus
    SCOTTISH GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 127 (03) : 209 - 230
  • [27] Current approaches for modeling ecosystem services and biodiversity in agroforestry systems: Challenges and ways forward
    Rahman, Muhammed Habib ur
    Ahrends, Hella Ellen
    Raza, Ahsan
    Gaiser, Thomas
    FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2023, 5
  • [28] Modeling and Simulation of Manufacturing Processes and Systems: Overview of Tools, Challenges, and Future Opportunities
    Alquraish, Mohammed
    ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2022, 12 (06) : 9779 - 9786
  • [29] Ecosystem Services Research in Green Sustainable Science and Technology Field: Trends, Issues, and Future Directions
    Tang, Juan
    Fang, Yudi
    Tian, Ziyan
    Gong, Yinghua
    Yuan, Liang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [30] Modeling on comparison of ecosystem services concepts, tools, methods and their ecological-economic implications: a review
    Meraj, Gowhar
    Singh, Suraj Kumar
    Kanga, Shruti
    Islam, Md. Nazrul
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8 (01) : 15 - 34