共 50 条
Monoallelic CEBPA mutations in normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia: independent favorable prognostic factor within NPM1 mutated patients
被引:25
|作者:
Dufour, Annika
[1
]
Schneider, Friederike
[1
]
Hoster, Eva
[3
,4
,5
]
Benthaus, Tobias
[1
]
Ksienzyk, Bianka
[1
]
Schneider, Stephanie
[1
]
Kakadia, Purvi M.
[1
]
Sauerland, Maria-Cristina
[6
]
Berdel, Wolfgang E.
[7
]
Buechner, Thomas
[7
]
Woermann, Bernhard
[8
]
Braess, Jan
[9
]
Subklewe, Marion
[1
]
Hiddemann, Wolfgang
[1
,2
]
Bohlander, Stefan K.
[1
,2
]
Spiekermann, Karsten
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Munich Grosshadern, Dept Med 3, Lab Leukemia Diagnost, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Helmholtz Ctr Munich Environm Hlth, Clin Cooperat Grp Leukemia, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Munich Grosshadern, Inst Med Informat, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Munich Grosshadern, Inst Biometry, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Munich Grosshadern, Inst Epidemiol, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[6] Univ Munster, Inst Biostat & Clin Res, Munster, Germany
[7] Univ Munster, Dept Med Hematol & Oncol A, Munster, Germany
[8] Municipal Hosp, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Braunschweig, Germany
[9] Hosp Barmherzige Bruder, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Regensburg, Germany
关键词:
Monoallelic CEBPA mutations;
NPM1;
mutation;
Normal karyotype;
Acute myeloid leukemia;
INTERNAL TANDEM DUPLICATION;
BINDING-PROTEIN-ALPHA;
ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA;
C/EBP-ALPHA;
ADULT PATIENTS;
DNMT3A MUTATIONS;
FLT3;
AML;
IMPACT;
NUCLEOPHOSMIN;
D O I:
10.1007/s00277-012-1423-4
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
We and others have shown that cytogenetically normal (CN)-AML patients with biallelic CEBPA gene mutations (biCEBPA) represent a molecularly distinct group with a favorable prognosis. Patients carrying a monoallelic CEBPA mutation (moCEBPA), however, show no different outcome compared to patients with wildtype CEBPA, and these mutations are frequently associated with mutated NPM1 or FLT3-ITD. So far, no molecular or clinical hallmark has been identified to prognostically distinguish moCEBPA patients from patients with wildtype CEBPA. Therefore, we used the data of 663 CN-AML patients treated within the AMLCG 1999 trial to explore the prognostic value of moCEBPA in the context of concomitant clinical and molecular markers (mutated NPM1, FLT3-ITD). Multiple Cox regression in 515 patients adjusting for all available potential confounders revealed that the NPM1 mutation modified the prognostic value of moCEBPA with respect to overall survival (OS, p = 0.017) and event-free survival (EFS, p = 0.011). MoCEBPA was beneficial in NPM1 mutated patients: adjusted OS-hazard ratio (HR) 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.63, p = 0.016; EFS-HR (95% CI) 0.16 (0.04-0.65), p = 0.010. In contrast, moCEBPA had no prognostic impact in patients with wildtype NPM1: OS-HR (95% CI) 1.08 (0.59-1.97), p = 0.804; EFS-HR (95% CI) 1.12 (0.64-1.96), p = 0.682. We found no prognostic effect modification for moCEBPA by FLT3-ITD. The presence of a moCEBPA mutation was shown to be associated with prolonged survival in NPM1 mutated CN-AML patients. Confirmation of these results in larger studies will clarify whether an additional moCEBPA mutation influences the risk stratification of patients with an NPM1 mutated/FLT3-ITD positive genotype.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1063
页数:13
相关论文