Less is More? Evaluating Technical Aspects and User Experiences of Smart Flood Risk Assessment Tools

被引:3
|
作者
Witte, Patrick A. [1 ]
Snel, Karin A. W. [1 ]
Geertman, Stan C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Human Geog & Planning, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
URBAN PLANNING | 2021年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
flood risk governance; planning support; pluralism; risk communication; task-technology fit; user-technology fit; WATER MANAGEMENT; COMMUNICATION; PERCEPTION; INFORMATION; RESIDENTS; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.17645/up.v6i3.4257
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
In light of several recent large-scale flooding events worldwide, the urgency of involving residents in the flood risk management debate is growing. However, this has so far proven to be problematic, mainly because of lacking or ineffective communication between stakeholders. One way to better involve residents in the flood risk management debate is by developing smart applications, dedicated to facilitate and increase the insights of residents into the flood risk and vulnerability of their private properties. However, what is lacking thus far is a systematic evaluation of the technical aspects and the user experiences of such tools. The goal of this article is to explore and evaluate the technical, analytical, and communicative qualities of smart flood risk assessment tools. To this end, a new smart application named FLOODLABEL is used, aiming to inform residents of flood-prone areas about potential flood risks and associated protection measures of their dwellings. Based on this, the article concludes that a smart application like FLOODLABEL can be beneficial for informing residents about flood risks and potential protection measures. However, it also shows that a one-size-fits-all approach is not suitable for informing residents on flood risks, inter alia because how residents perceive risks is not homogeneous. This research is therefore just the first step towards a more systematic evaluation method of smart applications.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 294
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] AI tools and methods for screening, extracting and evaluating NAM data for chemical risk assessment
    Bluemmel, T.
    Rehn, J.
    Mereu, C.
    Graf, F.
    Kneuer, C.
    Wittkowski, P.
    Sonnenburg, A.
    Padberg, F.
    Bech, K.
    van der Lugt, B.
    Bouwmeester, H.
    Kramer, N.
    Dobrikov, T.
    NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 396 : S56 - S56
  • [32] EVALUATING PREDICTIVE TOOLS FOR THROMBOSIS RISK ASSESSMENT IN BREAST CANCER-UNMET NEED
    Bucciol, Regan
    Tera, Yousra
    Bunker, Claire
    Kini, Aditi
    Mates, Mihaela
    Othman, Maha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2024, 46 : 19 - 19
  • [33] Are we taking a risk with risk assessment tools? Evaluating the relationship between NSQIP and the ACS risk calculator in colorectal surgery
    Keller, Deborah S.
    Ho, Jessie W.
    Mercadel, Alyssa J.
    Ogola, Gerald O.
    Steele, Scott R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 216 (04): : 645 - 651
  • [34] Risk Assessment—the Key to More Security? Factors, Tools, and Practices in Dealing with Extremist Individuals
    Katrin Höffler
    Miriam Meyer
    Veronika Möller
    European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 2022, 28 : 269 - 295
  • [35] Smart flood resilience: harnessing community-scale big data for predictive flood risk monitoring, rapid impact assessment, and situational awareness
    Yuan, Faxi
    Fan, Chao
    Farahmand, Hamed
    Coleman, Natalie
    Esmalian, Amir
    Lee, Cheng-Chun
    Patrascu, Flavia, I
    Zhang, Cheng
    Dong, Shangjia
    Mostafavi, Ali
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH: INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 2 (02):
  • [36] Risk Assessment-the Key to More Security? Factors, Tools, and Practices in Dealing with Extremist Individuals
    Hoeffler, Katrin
    Meyer, Miriam
    Moeller, Veronika
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL ON CRIMINAL POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 28 (02) : 269 - 295
  • [37] Requirements definition and risk assessment for a software development project leads to a more cost effective solution with less associated risk
    Rossman, P
    Martin, T
    TRANSFUSION, 2001, 41 (09) : 133S - 133S
  • [38] FIWARE-Compatible Smart Data Models for Satellite Imagery and Flood Risk Assessment to Enhance Data Management
    Kouloglou, Ioannis-Omiros
    Antzoulatos, Gerasimos
    Vosinakis, Georgios
    Lombardo, Francesca
    Abella, Alberto
    Bakratsas, Marios
    Moumtzidou, Anastasia
    Maltezos, Evangelos
    Gialampoukidis, Ilias
    Ouzounoglou, Eleftherios
    Vrochidis, Stefanos
    Amditis, Angelos
    Kompatsiaris, Ioannis
    Ferri, Michele
    INFORMATION, 2024, 15 (05)
  • [39] Technical experiences made with the litter bag test as required for the risk assessment of plant protection products in soil
    Dinter, Axel
    Coulson, Mike
    Heimbach, Fred
    Keppler, Juergen
    Krieg, Wolfgang
    Koelzer, Uschi
    JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2008, 8 (05) : 333 - 339
  • [40] Technical experiences made with the litter bag test as required for the risk assessment of plant protection products in soil
    Axel Dinter
    Mike Coulson
    Fred Heimbach
    Jürgen Keppler
    Wolfgang Krieg
    Uschi Kölzer
    Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2008, 8 : 333 - 339