Semantic Business Process Engineering

被引:0
|
作者
Lemcke, Jens [1 ]
Rahmani, Tirdad [1 ]
Friesen, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] CEC Karlsruhe, SAP Res, Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this tutorial, we compare OWL-DL reasoning and Petri net analysis for validating refinement and grounding of business processes. (1) Process refinement: Like in software engineering, the implementation of a business process involves different interacting roles, such as business expert, analyst, process architect, and developer. Each role designs and refines different abstractions of the process until it is sufficiently refined. It is important to verify that the process models of the different abstractions are consistent. (2) Process grounding: A sufficiently refined process has to be mapped on existing IT systems. Ideally, IT systems consist of components with a semantic annotation of their behavior. The most specific process must respect all IT systems' behaviors. Formally capturing process semantics enables to check automatically for consistent process refinement and grounding. The classic application of semantic techniques in the area of static models is well understood. The analysis of business processes deals with dynamics. Modeling dynamics is a challenge for current approaches of semantic Web services. We compare advantages and shortcomings of Petri net analysis and description logic (DL) reasoning for refinement and grounding validation.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 181
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Compliance Check in Semantic Business Process Management
    Gabor, Andras
    Ko, Andrea
    Szabo, Ildiko
    Ternai, Katalin
    Varga, Krisztian
    [J]. ON THE MOVE TO MEANINGFUL INTERNET SYSTEMS: OTM 2013 WORKSHOPS, 2013, 8186 : 353 - 362
  • [22] Key Deficiencies of Semantic Business Process Search
    Wasser, Avi
    Lincoln, Maya
    [J]. ON THE MOVE TO MEANINGFUL INTERNET SYSTEMS: OTM 2014 WORKSHOPS, 2014, 8842 : 339 - 346
  • [23] A semantic approach to monitor business process performance
    Thomas, M
    Redmond, R
    Yoon, V
    Singh, R
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2005, 48 (12) : 55 - 59
  • [24] METHODOLOGICAL EXTENSIONS FOR SEMANTIC BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING
    de Francisco, David
    Munoz, Henar
    Perez, Noelia
    Martinez, Javier
    Markovic, Ivan
    [J]. ICEIS 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, VOL ISAS-2: INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND SPECIFICATION, VOL 2, 2008, : 410 - +
  • [25] On Measuring Semantic Similarity of Business Process models
    Gao Juntao
    Zhang Li
    [J]. I-ESA 2009: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTEROPERABILITY FOR ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS CHINA, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 289 - 293
  • [26] BUSINESS PROCESS ENGINEERING WITH PARTIAL MODELS
    FAURE, JM
    BASSAND, A
    COUFFIN, F
    LAMPERIERE, S
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 1995, 27 (02) : 111 - 122
  • [27] Knowledge Engineering for Business Process Modeling
    Ouali, Sonya
    Mhiri, Mohamed
    Gargouri, Faiez
    [J]. ENASE: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION OF NOVEL APPROACHES TO SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2017, : 81 - 90
  • [28] Developing Taxonomies for Business Process Engineering
    Soetekouw, Ton
    Grefen, Paul
    Vanderfeesten, Irene
    Turetken, Oktay
    [J]. ENTERPRISE DESIGN, OPERATIONS, AND COMPUTING, EDOC 2023, 2024, 14367 : 169 - 186
  • [29] Re-engineering the business process
    不详
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS NEWS, 1998, 35 (10): : 48 - 48
  • [30] BUSINESS PROCESS SYSTEMS-ENGINEERING
    PARNABY, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1994, 9 (3-4) : 497 - 508