Value of sheanut cake as a dietary ingredient for broiler chickens

被引:12
|
作者
Atuahene, CC [1 ]
Donkoh, A [1 ]
Asante, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, Kumasi, Ghana
关键词
sheanut cake; growth performance; blood parameters; chickens; broilers;
D O I
10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00172-7
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Sheanut cake (SNC) was investigated for its nutritional quality. Chemical analyses of the cake indicated its overall nutritional value to be low. The crude protein, fat, fibre, ash and nitrogen-corrected metabolisable energy contents were 162.4 g kg(-1) DM, 134.0 g kg(-1) DM, 95.0 g kg(-1) DM, 42.0 g kg(-1) DM, and 7.12 MJ kg(-1) DM, respectively. It contained anti-nutrients such as theobromine and saponin. In a feeding trial, 240 commercial broiler chicks were randomly allocated to one of four dietary treatments. The dietary treatments consisted of the control diet, which contained maize as the main cereal source, and three other diets which contained varying levels of SNC (25, 50 and 75 g kg(-1)). Food and water were provided ad libitum for a period of 6 weeks. In this study, feed intake and weight gain were both significantly and inversely related with the level of SNC in the diet (r = -0.97 and -0.97, respectively). The level of SNC in the diet was also shown to be strongly correlated with feed conversion ratio (r = 0.96) and with water consumption(r = 0.98). Carcass dressing percentage was strongly influenced by the level of SNC in the diet. Mortality was also affected by the dietary treatments. Changes in physiological status, such as decreased concentration of red blood cells, haemoglobin, haematocrit, and total serum cholesterol were observed in birds fed diets containing high amounts of SNC. SNC could be included in broiler chicken diets at concentrations up to 25 g kg(-1) diet without an adverse effect on performance. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 142
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nutritional Value of Rice Bran Fermented by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Humic Substances and Its Utilization as a Feed Ingredient for Broiler Chickens
    Supriyati
    Haryati, T.
    Susanti, T.
    Susana, I. W. R.
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2015, 28 (02): : 231 - 238
  • [32] Nutritional value of chickpeas in rations of broiler chickens
    Christodoulou, V.
    Bampidis, V. A.
    Hucko, B.
    Iliadis, C.
    Mudrik, Z.
    ARCHIV FUR GEFLUGELKUNDE, 2006, 70 (03): : 112 - 118
  • [33] Nutritional value of wheat screenings for broiler chickens
    Audren, GP
    Classen, HL
    Schwean, KV
    Racz, V
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2002, 82 (03) : 393 - 398
  • [34] Roles of dietary fibre and ingredient particle size in broiler nutrition
    Kheravii, S. K.
    Morgan, N. K.
    Swick, R. A.
    Choct, M.
    Wu, S. -B.
    WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2018, 74 (02) : 301 - 316
  • [35] The nutritive value of maize cultivars for broiler chickens
    Lasek, O.
    Barteczko, J.
    Borowiec, F.
    Smulikowska, S.
    Augustyn, R.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND FEED SCIENCES, 2012, 21 (02): : 345 - 360
  • [36] Dietary manipulation of lean tissue deposition in broiler chickens
    Choct, M
    Naylor, AJ
    Oddy, VH
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2005, 18 (05): : 692 - 698
  • [37] Effect of Dietary Antimicrobials on Immune Status in Broiler Chickens
    Lee, K. W.
    Lillehoj, H. S.
    Lee, S. H.
    Jang, S. I.
    Park, M. S.
    Bautista, D. A.
    Ritter, G. D.
    Hong, Y. H.
    Siragusa, G. R.
    Lillehojs, E. P.
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2012, 25 (03): : 382 - 392
  • [38] Dietary sulphur as alternative antibacterial supplements for broiler chickens
    Park, S. O.
    Park, B. S.
    EUROPEAN POULTRY SCIENCE, 2017, 81
  • [39] INTERACTION OF DIETARY ELECTROLYTES AND COCCIDIOSTATS IN BROILER-CHICKENS
    FLEET, JC
    SAYLOR, WW
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 1983, 62 (07) : 1422 - 1423
  • [40] Exogenous corticosterone and dietary colour preference in broiler chickens
    Sahin, A
    Forbes, JM
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1998, 39 : S40 - S41